bo3 with map advantage

#1

w

0 Frags – +

genius

#2

lilith

11 Frags – +

dumbest thing ever

#3

mitch

0 Frags – +

Was there a reason for it being Bo3 instead Bo5?

#4

alfredodan

0 Frags – +

mitchWas there a reason for it being Bo3 instead Bo5?

5 maps in the map pool for the mini-season

[quote=mitch]Was there a reason for it being Bo3 instead Bo5?[/quote]

5 maps in the map pool for the mini-season

#5

moosiekins

2 Frags – +

mitchWas there a reason for it being Bo3 instead Bo5?

I asked kitteh before the match:
1) they wanted UBF winning team to have weighted advantage
2)

kitteh It’s the best way to reward the two winning performance while keeping the match nights manageable for everyone.

3) bo3 because its a miniseason

[quote=mitch]Was there a reason for it being Bo3 instead Bo5?[/quote]

I asked kitteh before the match:
1) they wanted UBF winning team to have weighted advantage
2) [quote=kitteh] It’s the best way to reward the two winning performance while keeping the match nights manageable for everyone. [/quote]
3) bo3 because its a miniseason

#6

syrus

3 Frags – +

The BO3 cause of the miniseason is understandable, but having a minimum of 1 map being played in a "finals" feels very dissatisfactory and more petty than anything. Imagine working hard only to play a potential of 1 map lmao

At that point just give the UBF team free power over the 3 maps played instead - this has the possibility of being very powerful aswell and enables more gaming which I'm sure everyone would want :)

The BO3 cause of the miniseason is understandable, but having a minimum of 1 map being played in a "finals" feels very dissatisfactory and more petty than anything. Imagine working hard only to play a potential of 1 map lmao

At that point just give the UBF team free power over the 3 maps played instead - this has the possibility of being very powerful aswell and enables more gaming which I'm sure everyone would want :)

#7

poy

0 Frags – +

Mini season stinks