minaajI wonder what this thread would look like if we lost bagel and it was a 1 map grands
I don't know how much opinions would change. This format was obviously bad. Having played bo5 with map ad and with p/b ad, map ad is probably a better format. Just from listening to people talk about it na is fairly indifferent about map ad in general while eu definitely dislikes it.
At 5 maps in the pool a bracket reset format would have been totally fine. Especially in an online season where you can just schedule the 2nd bo3 on a different day. RGL has used similar formats outside of 6s before. Play 4 maps with map ad + 1 ban would have also been fine. Potential for a bo1 gf is so obviously bad to watch, and definitely lackluster to play.
Map advantage is honestly pretty strong, especially in grands. For this season for instance, the two finalists should have pretty good reads on their respective map pools. For a tournament like physgun denver or poland likewise by finals time each team should have a pretty strong read on their map pool. TF2 also has this thing where a couple of the maps are a bit same-y like snake/sun/proc/metal so having maps included like granary, gully, bagel, via where teams fluctuate a lot more in skill level definitely improves the format. If we just played process 5 times, a map ad would be pretty fair. At physgun for instance, I thought it was pretty cool to play bagel after literally everyone banning it against us the entire tournament.
Upper bracket winner already has an advantage in that they have to play less games, which gives them more time to prepare and usually less to prepare for, as well as more time to rest. I don't really personally think a map adv is justified currently.