Upvote Upvoted 108 Downvote Downvoted
1 ⋅⋅ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
TF2 benchmarks
421
#421
0 Frags +
TheReduxPLComangliaTheReduxPL
Show Content

Extremely interesting, side note though you labeled the screenshot with that 141fps as "Windows"

Been thinking about going to Linux since I'm getting tired of Win10 updates fucking me over.
Looks correct on my side. The one with a smaller font in the menu is on Linux.

The game can still freeze randomly. Rare, but happens. I'll be playing TF2 for quite a bit on Linux, so if I notice anything interesting, I can report here.

Yep I'm just bad at reading XD

[quote=TheReduxPL][quote=Comanglia][quote=TheReduxPL]
[spoiler][url=http://imgur.com/a/X7PCi]http://imgur.com/a/X7PCi[/url][/spoiler][/quote]

Extremely interesting, side note though you labeled the screenshot with that 141fps as "Windows"

Been thinking about going to Linux since I'm getting tired of Win10 updates fucking me over.[/quote]
Looks correct on my side. The one with a smaller font in the menu is on Linux.

The game can still freeze randomly. Rare, but happens. I'll be playing TF2 for quite a bit on Linux, so if I notice anything interesting, I can report here.[/quote]

Yep I'm just bad at reading XD
422
#422
0 Frags +

2639 frames 29.124 seconds 90.61 fps (11.04 ms/f) 13.124 fps variability
AMD A10-5800k stock clock
EVGA GTX 760 SC
chris' maxframes
fullscreen
shadows disabled

2639 frames 25.710 seconds 102.64 fps ( 9.74 ms/f) 5.973 fps variability
with nothing else running

note: i use no hats mod,
first benchmark is with discord and firefox running cause thats how i usually play tf2

2639 frames 29.124 seconds 90.61 fps (11.04 ms/f) 13.124 fps variability
AMD A10-5800k stock clock
EVGA GTX 760 SC
chris' maxframes
fullscreen
shadows disabled

2639 frames 25.710 seconds 102.64 fps ( 9.74 ms/f) 5.973 fps variability
with nothing else running

note: i use no hats mod,
first benchmark is with discord and firefox running cause thats how i usually play tf2
423
#423
0 Frags +
2639 frames 14.023 seconds 188.20 fps ( 5.31 ms/f) 15.466 fps variability

CPU: i5-6600K @ 3.5GHz
Graphics Card: GTX 1070

dxlevel (default is 90): 81
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Comanglias
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

Additional notes: n/a

[quote]2639 frames 14.023 seconds 188.20 fps ( 5.31 ms/f) 15.466 fps variability[/quote]

CPU: i5-6600K @ 3.5GHz
Graphics Card: GTX 1070

dxlevel (default is 90): 81
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Comanglias
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

Additional notes: n/a
424
#424
0 Frags +

FPS configs: Comanglia's MaxFPS / custom
Mods:diminished explosions, no hats.
GPU: GeForce GTX 970 @stock
Full-screen or windowed: Full
CPU: i5-3570k @3.8 GHz
Resolution: 1280x720
Shadows: disabled
Driver ver: 382.33
Aero: Enabled

dx98:

2639 frames 17.202 seconds 153.41 fps ( 6.52 ms/f) 11.040 fps variability

dx95:

2639 frames 17.587 seconds 150.05 fps ( 6.66 ms/f) 11.523 fps variability

dx91:

2639 frames 17.215 seconds 153.30 fps ( 6.52 ms/f) 12.378 fps variability

dx81:

2639 frames 15.687 seconds 168.23 fps ( 5.94 ms/f) 14.179 fps variability

dx70:

2639 frames 15.582 seconds 169.37 fps ( 5.90 ms/f) 13.231 fps variability
FPS configs: Comanglia's MaxFPS / custom
Mods:diminished explosions, no hats.
GPU: GeForce GTX 970 @stock
Full-screen or windowed: Full
CPU: i5-3570k @3.8 GHz
Resolution: 1280x720
Shadows: disabled
Driver ver: 382.33
Aero: Enabled


[b]dx98:[/b]
[code]2639 frames 17.202 seconds 153.41 fps ( 6.52 ms/f) 11.040 fps variability[/code]

[b]dx95:[/b]
[code]2639 frames 17.587 seconds 150.05 fps ( 6.66 ms/f) 11.523 fps variability[/code]

[b]dx91:[/b]
[code]2639 frames 17.215 seconds 153.30 fps ( 6.52 ms/f) 12.378 fps variability[/code]

[b]dx81:[/b]
[code]2639 frames 15.687 seconds 168.23 fps ( 5.94 ms/f) 14.179 fps variability[/code]

[b]dx70:[/b]
[code]2639 frames 15.582 seconds 169.37 fps ( 5.90 ms/f) 13.231 fps variability[/code]
425
#425
0 Frags +

is dx 70 even supported?

is dx 70 even supported?
426
#426
4 Frags +

Very sure it's been unusable for 4 years now.

Very sure it's been unusable for 4 years now.
427
#427
0 Frags +
2639 frames 21.581 seconds 122.28 fps ( 8.18 ms/f) 8.895 fps variability

CPU: i5 7300HQ @ ~3.2 GHz (turboboosting)
Graphics Card: GeForce GTX 1050 Laptop

Driver version: 384.94
dxlevel: 90
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Comanglia's max FPS for mid quality PCs
Shadows: enabled

Additional notes: The computer is a Dell XPS 15 9560

[quote]2639 frames 21.581 seconds 122.28 fps ( 8.18 ms/f) 8.895 fps variability[/quote]

CPU: i5 7300HQ @ ~3.2 GHz (turboboosting)
Graphics Card: GeForce GTX 1050 Laptop

Driver version: 384.94
dxlevel: 90
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Comanglia's max FPS for mid quality PCs
Shadows: enabled

Additional notes: The computer is a Dell XPS 15 9560
428
#428
1 Frags +
2639 frames 21.033 seconds 125.47 fps ( 7.97 ms/f

CPU: i3 4170 @ 3.7GHz
GPU: Palit GTX 1050

dxlevel: 80
resolution: 1920 x 1080
fullscreen
shadows enabled

PS: what's the highest anyone's got on this?

[quote]2639 frames 21.033 seconds 125.47 fps ( 7.97 ms/f[/quote]

CPU: i3 4170 @ 3.7GHz
GPU: Palit GTX 1050

dxlevel: 80
resolution: 1920 x 1080
fullscreen
shadows enabled

PS: what's the highest anyone's got on this?
429
#429
0 Frags +
2639 frames 19.990 seconds 132.02 fps ( 7.57 ms/f) 10.076 fps variability

CPU: AMD FX6300 @ 3.70 GHz
GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 (ASUS DirectCU II), stock clocks

Windows version: 10 (1703 - Creators Update)
Driver version: 382.05
Dxlevel: 90

Resolution: 1440x1080 stretched over a 1080p panel
Full-screen or windowed: Fullscreen
Config: Comanglia's Max FPS for High Quality PCs
Shadows: Disabled

Additional notes:
AMD :^(
Two monitors, one 1080p and one 1280x1024.
Fresh Windows 10 install. Two Chrome tabs on background.

[code]2639 frames 19.990 seconds 132.02 fps ( 7.57 ms/f) 10.076 fps variability[/code]

[b]CPU[/b]: AMD FX6300 @ 3.70 GHz
[b]GPU[/b]: Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 (ASUS DirectCU II), stock clocks

[b]Windows version[/b]: 10 (1703 - Creators Update)
[b]Driver version[/b]: 382.05
[b]Dxlevel[/b]: 90

[b]Resolution[/b]: 1440x1080 stretched over a 1080p panel
[b]Full-screen or windowed[/b]: Fullscreen
[b]Config[/b]: Comanglia's Max FPS for High Quality PCs
[b]Shadows[/b]: Disabled

[b]Additional notes[/b]:
AMD :^(
Two monitors, one 1080p and one 1280x1024.
Fresh Windows 10 install. Two Chrome tabs on background.
430
#430
9 Frags +

CPU: Intel I7 8700k @5.1 GHZ
GPU: Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Gamerock , stock

Windows version: 10 (1703)
Driver version: 382.05

Resolution: 1920x1080
Fullscreen

Mastercoms config with compquality, blobby shadows no gibs/ragdolls and glow_outline_effect_enable 0:

dx95

2639 frames 10.217 seconds 258.28 fps ( 3.87 ms/f) 19.431 fps variability

dx 81

2639 frames 9.578 seconds 275.53 fps ( 3.63 ms/f) 22.105 fps variability

dx81 without shadows

2639 frames 9.261 seconds 284.95 fps ( 3.51 ms/f) 22.673 fps variability

Feliks config dx81, no shadows/ragdoll/gibs/glow_outline_effect_enable 0:

2639 frames 8.924 seconds 295.71 fps ( 3.38 ms/f) 23.189 fps variability

Note: "glow_outline_effect_enable 1" eats like 50fps for me.

[b]CPU[/b]: Intel I7 8700k @[b]5.1[/b] GHZ
[b]GPU[/b]: Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Gamerock , stock

[b]Windows [/b]version: 10 (1703)
[b]Driver [/b]version: 382.05

[b]Resolution[/b]: 1920x1080
[b]Fullscreen[/b]

[b]Mastercoms [/b]config with compquality, blobby shadows no gibs/ragdolls and glow_outline_effect_enable 0:

dx95
[code]2639 frames 10.217 seconds 258.28 fps ( 3.87 ms/f) 19.431 fps variability[/code]
dx 81
[code]2639 frames 9.578 seconds 275.53 fps ( 3.63 ms/f) 22.105 fps variability[/code]

dx81 without shadows
[code]2639 frames 9.261 seconds 284.95 fps ( 3.51 ms/f) 22.673 fps variability[/code]

[b]Feliks [/b]config dx81, no shadows/ragdoll/gibs/glow_outline_effect_enable 0:
[code]2639 frames 8.924 seconds 295.71 fps ( 3.38 ms/f) 23.189 fps variability[/code]


[b]Note:[/b] "glow_outline_effect_enable 1" eats like 50fps for me.
431
#431
0 Frags +
BigTCPU: Intel I7 8700k @5.1 GHZ

Could you please run the benchmark with hyperthreading off and 2 cores disabled, i'm curious how would it run @i3 8350k (although i guess it'll be the same.)

Also what cooler are you using.

[quote=BigT][b]CPU[/b]: Intel I7 8700k @[b]5.1[/b] GHZ
[/quote]

Could you please run the benchmark with hyperthreading off and 2 cores disabled, i'm curious how would it run @i3 8350k (although i guess it'll be the same.)

Also what cooler are you using.
432
#432
1 Frags +
jyrkasCould you please run the benchmark with hyperthreading off and 2 cores disabled, i'm curious how would it run @i3 8350k (although i guess it'll be the same.)
Also what cooler are you using.

There shouldn't be a huge difference (unless you're streaming or using alot of resource intensive applications while gaming) to a i3 8350k at the same clockspeed because afaik Tf2 doesn't utilize more than 3 threads.

I'm using a Thermalright Le Grand Macho RT. My cpu is delidded aswell otherwise I probably wouldn't be able to hit more than 5 ghz without getting too hot/switching to a good AIO/Custom Loop.

[quote=jyrkas]
Could you please run the benchmark with hyperthreading off and 2 cores disabled, i'm curious how would it run @i3 8350k (although i guess it'll be the same.)
Also what cooler are you using.[/quote]

There shouldn't be a huge difference (unless you're streaming or using alot of resource intensive applications while gaming) to a i3 8350k at the same clockspeed because afaik Tf2 doesn't utilize more than 3 threads.

I'm using a Thermalright Le Grand Macho RT. My cpu is [u]delidded[/u] aswell otherwise I probably wouldn't be able to hit more than 5 ghz without getting too hot/switching to a good AIO/Custom Loop.
433
#433
0 Frags +

Thanks, i'll be probably getting i5/i7 anyways and a cheaper cooler, so i'm just hoping i can keep 4.7Ghz on all cores. I'm too scared to delid.

Thanks, i'll be probably getting i5/i7 anyways and a cheaper cooler, so i'm just hoping i can keep 4.7Ghz on all cores. I'm too scared to delid.
434
#434
2 Frags +

finally got a new pc.
Intel Core i7-8700(non-k)
8GB DDR4 RAM@2666Mhz
Radeon RX580 (8GB)

Driver version: Adrenalin 17.12.2
dxlevel (default is 90): 90
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Comanglia+these things
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

2639 frames 11.862 seconds 222.48 fps ( 4.49 ms/f) 14.073 fps variability

-dxlevel 81, comanglia/mastercoms

2639 frames 10.769 seconds 245.05 fps ( 4.08 ms/f) 18.744 fps variability
finally got a new pc.
Intel Core i7-8700(non-k)
8GB DDR4 RAM@2666Mhz
Radeon RX580 (8GB)

Driver version: Adrenalin 17.12.2
dxlevel (default is 90): 90
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Comanglia+[url=https://pastebin.com/Zvx5Gbac]these things[/url]
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

[quote]2639 frames 11.862 seconds 222.48 fps ( 4.49 ms/f) 14.073 fps variability[/quote]

-dxlevel 81, comanglia/mastercoms
[quote]2639 frames 10.769 seconds 245.05 fps ( 4.08 ms/f) 18.744 fps variability[/quote]
435
#435
0 Frags +

Old C2Q system, I'm planning on getting some decent 1066mhz RAM/ made-for-OCers 800mhz RAM.

CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 OC'd 3.9 GHz (can't go higher due to RAM frequency limitations, I would love some 4.2 GHz with aftermarket air cooler)
RAM: 2x1 stick low-profile ddr2 800mhz 5-6-6-18, 2x1 stick ddr2 800mhz 5-5-5-15 (all oc'd to 931 mhz, if I go any higher it crashes even for 6-6-6-20)
GPU:ASUS custom Geforce 9600gt 512mb Gddr3
MOBO (if want): ASUS P5K vanilla (It has a lot of vdroop, no pencil mod done)

All settings maxed (excluding AA, set to off due to vram limitation and set to Trilinear), DX9.
Resolution: 1366x768 fullscreen
mat_phong, speculate and bumpmap set to 1.
No custom cfg set, other than mat_queue_mode 2

2639 frames 45.312 seconds 58.24 fps (17.17 ms/f) 3.600 fps variability

**probably going to test this benchmark with some comaglia cfgs, or messing with stock clock**

Old C2Q system, I'm planning on getting some decent 1066mhz RAM/ made-for-OCers 800mhz RAM.

CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 OC'd 3.9 GHz (can't go higher due to RAM frequency limitations, I would love some 4.2 GHz with aftermarket air cooler)
RAM: 2x1 stick low-profile ddr2 800mhz 5-6-6-18, 2x1 stick ddr2 800mhz 5-5-5-15 (all oc'd to 931 mhz, if I go any higher it crashes even for 6-6-6-20)
GPU:ASUS custom Geforce 9600gt 512mb Gddr3
MOBO (if want): ASUS P5K vanilla (It has a lot of vdroop, no pencil mod done)

All settings maxed (excluding AA, set to off due to vram limitation and set to Trilinear), DX9.
Resolution: 1366x768 fullscreen
mat_phong, speculate and bumpmap set to 1.
No custom cfg set, other than mat_queue_mode 2

[quote]2639 frames 45.312 seconds 58.24 fps (17.17 ms/f) 3.600 fps variability[/quote]

**probably going to test this benchmark with some comaglia cfgs, or messing with stock clock**
436
#436
1 Frags +

Another occasion for another experiment. This time I made use of the ongoing GPU prize craze that's been happening - selling my RX 480 4GB for $400, then adding 100 more to get a GTX 980 Ti (it's also my first NVidia card since... ever?), which is about 25-30% more powerful than the RX 480.
It also seemed like a good opportunity to find out if blaming my Radeon for lower-than-expected performance was justified or not. Also included the results of a temporary shit-tier GPU (Radeon HD 7770) I used while waiting for the new card to arrive.

Tested on: Core i5-3570K @ 4.3 GHz, 8GB DDR3, Windows 10 Pro 1709.
TF2 configuration: mastercomfig (midquality preset), 1440x900 windowed, mods: explosions, no bullet dust, no soundscapes mod

For any non-nerds out there, I'll also put the performance rating measured in percentage compared to RX 480 (data taken from TechPowerUp - relative performance).

RX 480 4GB (100%): 127.47 fps - https://imgur.com/e0m1umz
HD 7770 1GB (27%): 130,87 fps - https://imgur.com/q8odAc3
GTX 980 Ti 6GB (132%): 130,11 fps - https://imgur.com/AjVVKcM

If you told me this makes no sense, I really wouldn't argue, I don't know what to take away from this. I thought my current CPU isn't bottlenecking my system, but in the other hand, johnf's system with the same CPU (but 100 MHz higher) and a weaker card reaches 200 fps. Maybe comanglia's cfg is just so much faster, idk, I'll try this config tomorrow and update the post.
Or maybe it's the single-channel DDR3 memory... I was planning on getting another 8GB stick to get 16 gigs in total next month, I'll have to test that too.

Another occasion for another experiment. This time I made use of the ongoing GPU prize craze that's been happening - selling my RX 480 4GB for $400, then adding 100 more to get a GTX 980 Ti (it's also my first NVidia card since... ever?), which is about 25-30% more powerful than the RX 480.
It also seemed like a good opportunity to find out if blaming my Radeon for lower-than-expected performance was justified or not. Also included the results of a temporary shit-tier GPU (Radeon HD 7770) I used while waiting for the new card to arrive.

[b]Tested on:[/b] Core i5-3570K @ 4.3 GHz, 8GB DDR3, Windows 10 Pro 1709.
[b]TF2 configuration:[/b] mastercomfig (midquality preset), 1440x900 windowed, mods: explosions, no bullet dust, no soundscapes mod

For any non-nerds out there, I'll also put the performance rating measured in percentage compared to RX 480 ([url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2848/radeon-rx-480]data taken from TechPowerUp - relative performance[/url]).

[b]RX 480[/b] 4GB ([b]100%[/b]): [b]127.47 fps[/b] - https://imgur.com/e0m1umz
[b]HD 7770[/b] 1GB ([b][u]27%[/u][/b]): [b]130,87 fps[/b] - https://imgur.com/q8odAc3
[b]GTX 980 Ti[/b] 6GB ([b]132%[/b]): [b]130,11 fps[/b] - https://imgur.com/AjVVKcM

If you told me this makes no sense, I really wouldn't argue, I don't know what to take away from this. I thought my current CPU isn't bottlenecking my system, but in the other hand, johnf's system with the same CPU (but 100 MHz higher) and a weaker card [url=http://www.teamfortress.tv/7598/tf2-benchmarks/?page=13#384]reaches 200 fps[/url]. Maybe comanglia's cfg is just so much faster, idk, I'll try this config tomorrow and update the post.
Or maybe it's the single-channel DDR3 memory... I was planning on getting another 8GB stick to get 16 gigs in total next month, I'll have to test that too.
437
#437
2 Frags +

To be bottlenecked by the GPU in TF2 you'd have to replace it with an Etch A Sketch.
Single channel RAM, possibly lower clocked/worse timings too and the updates that happened since 10 months ago certainly don't help.
Also different config and

Additional notes: also using nohats mod and the minimal blue sapper explosions thing
To be bottlenecked by the GPU in TF2 you'd have to replace it with an Etch A Sketch.
Single channel RAM, possibly lower clocked/worse timings too and the updates that happened since 10 months ago certainly don't help.
Also different config and
[quote]Additional notes: also using nohats mod and the minimal blue sapper explosions thing[/quote]
438
#438
4 Frags +
TheReduxPLTF2 configuration: mastercomfig (midquality preset), 1440x900 windowed
Maybe comanglia's cfg is just so much faster, idk, I'll try this config tomorrow and update the post.

You're using midquality, which isn't comparable to Comanglia's config at all. It enables shadows, ragdolls, dynamic lighting, effects and water reflections.

[quote=TheReduxPL]
[b]TF2 configuration:[/b] mastercomfig (midquality preset), 1440x900 windowed
Maybe comanglia's cfg is just so much faster, idk, I'll try this config tomorrow and update the post.
[/quote]
You're using midquality, which isn't comparable to Comanglia's config at all. It enables shadows, ragdolls, dynamic lighting, effects and water reflections.
439
#439
1 Frags +
mastercomsTheReduxPLTF2 configuration: mastercomfig (midquality preset), 1440x900 windowed
Maybe comanglia's cfg is just so much faster, idk, I'll try this config tomorrow and update the post.
You're using midquality, which isn't comparable to Comanglia's config at all. It enables shadows, ragdolls, dynamic lighting, effects and water reflections.

Yea, I was a bit in a hurry publishing these results, so here's more:
(forgot to mention: I'm also using the explosion mod, the no bullet dust mod and the no soundscapes mod - applies to the previous post as well)

compquality didn't really cause any gains:

2639 frames 20.215 seconds 130.55 fps ( 7.66 ms/f) 9.262 fps variability

comp, however, was significantly better:

2639 frames 16.819 seconds 156.91 fps ( 6.37 ms/f) 11.698 fps variability

Given the performance boost I got in CS:GO, I expected a bit more off of TF2, but oh well.

SetsulTo be bottlenecked by the GPU in TF2 you'd have to replace it with an Etch A Sketch.

I'm thinking so too. In fact, I have a GeForce 210 I could also use to benchmark TF2 on, just for science...

[quote=mastercoms][quote=TheReduxPL]
[b]TF2 configuration:[/b] mastercomfig (midquality preset), 1440x900 windowed
Maybe comanglia's cfg is just so much faster, idk, I'll try this config tomorrow and update the post.
[/quote]
You're using midquality, which isn't comparable to Comanglia's config at all. It enables shadows, ragdolls, dynamic lighting, effects and water reflections.[/quote]
Yea, I was a bit in a hurry publishing these results, so here's more:
(forgot to mention: I'm also using the explosion mod, the no bullet dust mod and the no soundscapes mod - applies to the previous post as well)

[b]compquality[/b] didn't really cause any gains:
[code]2639 frames 20.215 seconds 130.55 fps ( 7.66 ms/f) 9.262 fps variability[/code]

[b]comp[/b], however, was significantly better:
[code]2639 frames 16.819 seconds 156.91 fps ( 6.37 ms/f) 11.698 fps variability[/code]

Given the performance boost I got in CS:GO, I expected a bit more off of TF2, but oh well.

[quote=Setsul]To be bottlenecked by the GPU in TF2 you'd have to replace it with an Etch A Sketch.[/quote]
I'm thinking so too. In fact, I have a GeForce 210 I could also use to benchmark TF2 on, just for science...
440
#440
0 Frags +

Instead of guessing you could just use the exact same config and mods and see if you get a similar result.

Instead of guessing you could just use the exact same config and mods and see if you get a similar result.
441
#441
-1 Frags +
SetsulInstead of guessing you could just use the exact same config and mods and see if you get a similar result.

What guessing?
Switching configs isn't as seamless as I'd like it to be, I'll go with mastercomfig's comp preset for now, and I'll test comanglia's in free time, maybe later today :)

[quote=Setsul]Instead of guessing you could just use the exact same config and mods and see if you get a similar result.[/quote]
What guessing?
Switching configs isn't as seamless as I'd like it to be, I'll go with mastercomfig's comp preset for now, and I'll test comanglia's in free time, maybe later today :)
442
#442
0 Frags +

Guessing why you're not getting the same fps with a different config.

Guessing why you're not getting the same fps with a different config.
443
#443
0 Frags +

I'm just not expecting 40 fps difference between comangia's cfg and mastercom's comp preset. Here's the result from comanglia's cfg, as expected:

2639 frames 17.370 seconds 151.93 fps ( 6.58 ms/f) 14.589 fps variability
I'm just not expecting 40 fps difference between comangia's cfg and mastercom's comp preset. Here's the result from comanglia's cfg, as expected:
[code]2639 frames 17.370 seconds 151.93 fps ( 6.58 ms/f) 14.589 fps variability[/code]
444
#444
0 Frags +
SetsulTo be bottlenecked by the GPU in TF2 you'd have to replace it with an Etch A Sketch.
Single channel RAM, possibly lower clocked/worse timings too and the updates that happened since 10 months ago certainly don't help.
Also different config andAdditional notes: also using nohats mod and the minimal blue sapper explosions thing

Heh.gif
My GT 9600 (More powerful than a gt210) still bottlenecks (most of the time 99% or usually with vram) tf2...
Guess I'll plan on getting 8 gb ddr2 800mhz, than going for a discrete used GPU (i'm interested in a 780/780ti usually for productivity, due to CUDA acceleration).

[quote=Setsul]To be bottlenecked by the GPU in TF2 you'd have to replace it with an Etch A Sketch.
Single channel RAM, possibly lower clocked/worse timings too and the updates that happened since 10 months ago certainly don't help.
Also different config and
[quote]Additional notes: also using nohats mod and the minimal blue sapper explosions thing[/quote][/quote]
Heh.gif
My GT 9600 (More powerful than a gt210) still bottlenecks (most of the time 99% or usually with vram) tf2...
Guess I'll plan on getting 8 gb ddr2 800mhz, than going for a discrete used GPU (i'm interested in a 780/780ti usually for productivity, due to CUDA acceleration).
445
#445
0 Frags +

If you're on DDR2 then single channel RAM might not be your problem.
Dual channel RAM doesn't help when both your CPU and your GPU suck.

If you're on DDR2 then single channel RAM might not be your problem.
Dual channel RAM doesn't help when both your CPU and your GPU suck.
446
#446
0 Frags +

2639 frames 11.003 seconds 239.83 fps ( 4.17 ms/f) 18.886 fps variability -dxlevel 81

2639 frames 12.331 seconds 214.01 fps ( 4.67 ms/f) 15.882 fps variability -dxlevel 91

cowmanglia stability cfg
CPU: i7-7700K @ 4.2GHz
GPU: EVGA 1080Ti Stock
RAM: 16GB Corsair Predator DDR4 @ 2666MHz
MOBO: ASRock z70 Killer SLI/AC

Didn't have any OCs on for this or do any tweaking in Profile Inspector. If i'm feeling frisky later, I'll mess around with some stuff.

2639 frames 11.003 seconds 239.83 fps ( 4.17 ms/f) 18.886 fps variability -dxlevel 81

2639 frames 12.331 seconds 214.01 fps ( 4.67 ms/f) 15.882 fps variability -dxlevel 91

cowmanglia stability cfg
CPU: i7-7700K @ 4.2GHz
GPU: EVGA 1080Ti Stock
RAM: 16GB Corsair Predator DDR4 @ 2666MHz
MOBO: ASRock z70 Killer SLI/AC


Didn't have any OCs on for this or do any tweaking in Profile Inspector. If i'm feeling frisky later, I'll mess around with some stuff.
447
#447
0 Frags +

did a fresh install of win7 64bit and decided i might aswell benchmark no windows updates vs windows updated
CPU: FX-8350 - Turbo boost disabled
GPU: Nvidia GTX 970 - 390.77 driver - def settings
RAM: 8GB Kingston

comangliacoms toaster - mat_dxlevel 95 - benchmark_test
4812 frames 28.177 seconds 170.78 fps ( 5.86 ms/f) 17.776 fps variability
4812 frames 28.420 seconds 169.32 fps ( 5.91 ms/f) 17.584 fps variability
4812 frames 28.433 seconds 169.24 fps ( 5.91 ms/f) 17.914 fps variability
Avg: 169,45fps
After win7 updates
4812 frames 24.457 seconds 196.75 fps ( 5.08 ms/f) 23.563 fps variability
4812 frames 24.744 seconds 194.47 fps ( 5.14 ms/f) 23.344 fps variability
4812 frames 24.531 seconds 196.16 fps ( 5.10 ms/f) 23.591 fps variability
Avg: 195,79fps /// 15% fps gain
did a fresh install of win7 64bit and decided i might aswell benchmark no windows updates vs windows updated
CPU: FX-8350 - Turbo boost disabled
GPU: Nvidia GTX 970 - 390.77 driver - def settings
RAM: 8GB Kingston
[code]
comangliacoms toaster - mat_dxlevel 95 - benchmark_test
4812 frames 28.177 seconds 170.78 fps ( 5.86 ms/f) 17.776 fps variability
4812 frames 28.420 seconds 169.32 fps ( 5.91 ms/f) 17.584 fps variability
4812 frames 28.433 seconds 169.24 fps ( 5.91 ms/f) 17.914 fps variability
Avg: 169,45fps
After win7 updates
4812 frames 24.457 seconds 196.75 fps ( 5.08 ms/f) 23.563 fps variability
4812 frames 24.744 seconds 194.47 fps ( 5.14 ms/f) 23.344 fps variability
4812 frames 24.531 seconds 196.16 fps ( 5.10 ms/f) 23.591 fps variability
Avg: 195,79fps /// 15% fps gain
[/code]
448
#448
-4 Frags +
2639 frames 18.298 seconds 144.22 fps ( 6.93 ms/f) 17.998 fps variability

dxlevel 98 1280x720 fullscreen mastercoms maxperformance
CPU: AMD 1950X @ 3.4 GHz
GPU: 1080Ti
RAM: 32GB @ 2667MHz
regretting the 1950x since i never do anything with 13 of it's 16 cores lol im dumb. i get like 80fps on midfights, better fps on the computers at lan that had an i5 @ 3.2GHz and a 1050Ti :(

[quote]2639 frames 18.298 seconds 144.22 fps ( 6.93 ms/f) 17.998 fps variability
[/quote]
dxlevel 98 1280x720 fullscreen mastercoms maxperformance
CPU: AMD 1950X @ 3.4 GHz
GPU: 1080Ti
RAM: 32GB @ 2667MHz
regretting the 1950x since i never do anything with 13 of it's 16 cores lol im dumb. i get like 80fps on midfights, better fps on the computers at lan that had an i5 @ 3.2GHz and a 1050Ti :(
449
#449
0 Frags +
Vouri2639 frames 18.298 seconds 144.22 fps ( 6.93 ms/f) 17.998 fps variability

return and get an 8700k, z370 board and decent air cooler
insta +100 fps and give the 400 € you save to me for providing the advice

[quote=Vouri]2639 frames 18.298 seconds 144.22 fps ( 6.93 ms/f) 17.998 fps variability
[/quote]
return and get an 8700k, z370 board and decent air cooler
insta +100 fps and give the 400 € you save to me for providing the advice
450
#450
0 Frags +
Vouri2639 frames 18.298 seconds 144.22 fps ( 6.93 ms/f) 17.998 fps variabilitydxlevel 98 1280x720 fullscreen mastercoms maxperformance
CPU: AMD 1950X @ 3.4 GHz
GPU: 1080Ti
RAM: 32GB @ 2667MHz
regretting the 1950x since i never do anything with 13 of it's 16 cores lol im dumb. i get like 80fps on midfights, better fps on the computers at lan that had an i5 @ 3.2GHz and a 1050Ti :(

i hope you play other games to put that 1080 to use lol, otherwise that might very well be the most expensive tf2 machine i've seen

[quote=Vouri][quote]2639 frames 18.298 seconds 144.22 fps ( 6.93 ms/f) 17.998 fps variability
[/quote]
dxlevel 98 1280x720 fullscreen mastercoms maxperformance
CPU: AMD 1950X @ 3.4 GHz
GPU: 1080Ti
RAM: 32GB @ 2667MHz
regretting the 1950x since i never do anything with 13 of it's 16 cores lol im dumb. i get like 80fps on midfights, better fps on the computers at lan that had an i5 @ 3.2GHz and a 1050Ti :([/quote]
i hope you play other games to put that 1080 to use lol, otherwise that might very well be the most expensive tf2 machine i've seen
1 ⋅⋅ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Please sign in through STEAM to post a comment.