Admin response on this situation:
"Hello everyone! We acknowledge the community’s concerns and have decided to part ways with Stu effective immediately. After discussions, we also have mutually agreed for Temm to step down from his position in the admin team effective immediately.
We would also like to clarify that Akio has not been a member of our admin team since 10/12/24 but regrettably had access to some admin discussions up until July. This has since been revoked and we apologise for allowing this to happen.
We are currently investigating the concerns that were raised by the community and hope to provide an update shortly.
Moving forward we will be taking steps to ensure that we improve our practices and be more transparent with the community. Thank you for your understanding." - Nixon
My opinion, skip if you don't care:
I don't think this is enough. A "mutual" decision to leave the admin team is actually crazy to me, why is it mutual? None of them should have a say at all in whether they stay or go. The fact akio had access to admin discussions 6 months after leaving that position is also bizarre. Above all, why are none of these people getting banned?
A guy pushing 30 asking a 16 year old if they want to have sexual intercourse should be perma banned.
A guy pushing 30 inviting a 17 year old to an ORGY should be perma banned.
A guy PUSHING 40 who engages in that kind of content should be perma banned. It actually doesn't matter if its children or not. Anyone who makes public whatever kind of deranged pornography fetishes they have shouldn't be allowed in this community. Like that is literally the weirdest shit I have ever seen (and its censored) imagine what else he looks at that's privated. People have been banned for less before.
With all that said, Nixon does state that they will investigate further so hopefully they come to the correct conclusion and do what is right. I hope that these guys don't have 6 months access to admin discussions!