I feel like jukebox on solly is pretty one note, but he executes his bombs really well cuz his jumps/aim are so strong
| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561198013620065 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:53354337] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:26677168 |
| Country | Bhutan |
| Signed Up | July 18, 2012 |
| Last Posted | January 7, 2026 at 6:20 PM |
| Posts | 5516 (1.1 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | |
| Windows Sensitivity | |
| Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
|
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | |
| Keyboard | |
| Mousepad | |
| Headphones | |
| Monitor | |
wafflebalso brownymaster i can justify being a woman because everyone percieves me as one
while I do refer to trans women as women with no problem, I have no idea why you're making the determination external ("everyone perceives me as one" p.s. i before e except after c), rather than internal ("my gender identity is female so that's what I am").
if bloodsire met you in real life and thought you looked like a dude would you stop being a woman? are ugly transexuals still men?
I think a better argument against furries and shit is that what they're doing is almost certainly a choice. all human beings are exposed to male and female hormones and don't diverge to one gender until what, like 20 weeks into development in the womb? I'm pretty sure furries aren't exposed to squirrel genes in the womb
SparrowBLoodSireSparrow
Continuing on that, what if it was impossible for you to tell?
I believe it's on the post-op person to inform their partner. If the game is to see how I would react I couldn't tell you, because it hasn't happened. I would be miffed in all likelihood. Why? Dunno, it's just how I feel, and I cannot change that and I find it doubly and hypocritically wrong for someone to suggest I should.
So are you of the opinion that when you have two things that are functionally and aesthetically the same, viewing them as different due to invisible factors that you would be unaware of if you were not told is rational? I don't think you can really argue that it is rational, and while I don't necessarily blame you or think less of you for feeling that way, I think it's unrealistic of you to consider it not a bigoted opinion.
To further illustrate my point, I will provide an example.
A man, upon meeting a woman, finds her physically attractive and chooses to strike up a conversation with her, hoping to pursue a romantic relationship. During the conversation, the man learns that one of the woman's parents happens to be black. Upon learning this, the man no longer finds the woman attractive and is no longer interested in pursuing a romantic relationship with her because the fact that one of her parents is black makes him uncomfortable. Do you consider this man a bigot?
I don't necessarily agree that "irrational" and "bigoted" are the same thing. every human psyche is filled with thousands of irrationalities, which are pretty unavoidably ingrained in all our dumb stone-age brains. I agree that there is no difference between bloodsire's feelings and the analogy you use her (although our society would, unfortunately, judge them very differently), but to call either bigoted if the person is aware of their own irrationality is to me a lack of empathy for other human beings.
maybe the guy can't look at his girlfriend without picturing her as black, which is totally unattractive to him. maybe bloodsire can't look at a photo of waffleb without picturing what she looked like as a dude. is this bigotry? I would not say so.
wafflebmgib
Not trying to be conceited, but everyone else does see it that way, sorry. Everyone who I've told or had to tell in real life is always either very surprised or hesitant to believe me, since the only trans people they've seen are the ones that don't pass (I wonder why?) There are plenty of trans people, man or woman, that don't get 'clocked' in real life
they gotta look at hand size then m8
BLoodSireFor instance the M<F we agree identifies as female and is thus attracted to men and the F<M male and thus attracted to females
I want to point out that this is completely wrong, gender identity and sexual orientation are not the same thing, there are plenty of transexuals who are sexually attracted to people who are the gender they transitioned to (hell, I'm pretty sure that includes waffleb)
BLoodSireI do, however, see what smaka is trying to get at. We aren't allowed to talk like this because it might mean biggotry, judgement, and hurt, things we try so hard to move beyond and remove from the social discourse. So opinions deemed taboo begin being lopped in with ignorance and biggotry, but I think there is a founded point here: If you look at the human species, the male/female dichotomy, what is immediately understood is the importance of sexual reproduction. Not importance in necessity of the act to be performed, but importance in how the species is identified and how it typically operates. In that sense, non-hetero relations are...lets not say "not normal" (society has conflated the term normal) lets say "atypical" to the apparent function of the species.
1.) I have still yet to see an argument about the importance of sexual reproduction that takes into account straight, cis-gendered people who just choose not to have kids
2.) sexual reproduction on the level of the species is necessary for the survival of the species. sexual reproduction at the level of the organism is not necessary and not "normal" per se either. what about all the animals that die before they reach sexual maturity, or never find a mate? are they really atypical?
3.) "normal" is a man-made term anyways. nature draws no lines and sets no norms, it's all relative. statistically, any organism that isn't a beetle isn't normal.
onv"metal midgets".
http://images.uncyc.org/commons/c/cc/Midget_hard-core-heavy-metal-midget.jpg
the main reason its important to differentiate between trans women and genetic women is that some trans females are good at video games and absolutely no birth women are
low motility esports
edit: I want to contribute more to this thread than that but I think everyone is dumb and wrong and im an angry shit so I wont
one_upperWe've got a lot of hungry players on our team
I'm hungry, too.
Unfortunately, I have a full plate
The Manly Maws
reading this post made me hungry :<
djcmustardoverlordid like to see what rule he could concoct that would explain my suddenlystarmia thread being deleted
was that the thread that devolved into a bunch of sexist bullshit with people accusing mia of only casting because she was fucking byte?
note: i didn't remove it
so lock it then, dont pretend it never existed and that my initial, non-sexist post wasn't valid
id like to see what rule he could concoct that would explain my suddenlystarmia thread being deleted
how many upsets this season in invite, based on final seedings of the teams (excluding forfeits):
process- 1 (ag vs r5)
badlands- 1 (mixup vs ag)
snakewater- 1 (mad men vs ag- if you count it)
gravelpit- 0 (usually more than this season though)
metalworks- 0
granary- 1 (mad men vs top guns)
gullywash- 0
viaduct- 1 (top guns vs solace)
mgully is not good
mid is retarded
last is retarded
no ability to forward hold
dropdown is retarded
holding 2 is retarded
idk gully really seems to shrink the skill difference between teams more than any other map because of how forgiving it is for wiping on mids/backcapping
I think you're in the minority of people for believing mid, the dropdown, and maybe holding 2 are retarded
I'm pretty sure gullywash is far less prone to upsets than viaduct/gpit/badlands- the maps that are either super standard or super weird have the most upsets, because there's a stronger likelihood that a) if it's super standard, the lesser team can play it well even if theyre a newer team/have worse chemistry, or b) if it's a weird map the lesser team either has played it more or just gets super lucky
I was bored, so I averaged how long each 5cp map took to play this season for invite games
gullywash- avg ~38 mins
badlands- avg ~30 mins
granary- avg ~36 mins
snakewater- avg ~37 mins
process- avg ~34 mins
metalworks- avg ~34 mins
what can we tell from this?
1. all the results were extremely close, meaning that if we're evaluating maps based on how stalematey they are, with badlands being the ideal and a like 25-45 min game being most fun to watch, we're doin pretty well
2. gullywash was BARELY the map that took the longest on average
HOWEVER
a) it was by a very slim amount, well within the margin of error
b) vector had died by that point, and when vector played the top teams they lost fairly quickly (although they also had long games vs r5 and root+6)
c) root plus six did not play hrg, tri hards or mixup that week, neither did solace
d) the two longest matches that week, hrg vs mad men and tri hards vs mixup, were also both very entertaining and close
basically, all the evidence points to the fact that, with the maps we have now (minus maybe badlands), how long a game takes is MUCH more dependent on the skill of the two teams and how close the game is rather than the map
Ruwinmustardoverlordremember when people said not to just bandwagon the opinion of any invite player in map votes?
ruwin is wrong, gullywash is one of the best maps in the games, keep it in
i like gullywash, never said i didn't. but i can't deny that the last point is a pain in the ass and always has been. i'm more of the belief that we should cycle in 1-2 new maps every season so we can discover those gems that we otherwise wouldn't have.
if both teams are really close in skill and the attacking team has no uber advantage, almost every last in the game is a pain in the ass, even badlands and granary. I see no evidence that, quick fix nonwithstanding, gullywash last leads to particularly bad stalemates. both the strat of suiciding for a pick class and the strat of getting ubers out of the way to repush non-uber work just as well on gullywash as they do on other maps.
as for cycling new maps in, I think that
a) it's better ideally to have a stable map pool that doesnt change often to make it easier on spectators and allow teams to get really good on the 8 existing maps
b) there is really only a need to look for gems if the existing maps are lacking, and I dont think gullywash is (I dont think gpit is either, but I realize I'm in the minority on that one, whereas before the most recent esea lan hardly anyone was talking about removing gullywash)