Upvote Upvoted 108 Downvote Downvoted
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ⋅⋅ 19
TF2 benchmarks
121
#121
-1 Frags +
2639 frames 11.225 seconds 235.10 fps ( 4.25 ms/f) 9.847 fps variability

CPU and overclock: 4670K @ 4.3 GHz
Graphics Card: Crossfire 7870s

Driver version: 13.2
dxlevel: 81
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris dx8 highframes w/ cl_threaded_bone_setup 1
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

2 monitors, aero disabled

[quote]2639 frames 11.225 seconds 235.10 fps ( 4.25 ms/f) 9.847 fps variability
[/quote]

CPU and overclock: 4670K @ 4.3 GHz
Graphics Card: Crossfire 7870s

Driver version: 13.2
dxlevel: 81
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris dx8 highframes w/ cl_threaded_bone_setup 1
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

2 monitors, aero disabled
122
#122
2 Frags +

Alright so I'll bump this thread instead of creating a new one.
I did some benchmarks today and noticed some really weird behaviour.
First of all, my specs:

CPU and overclock: 3770K @ 4.2 GHz
Graphics Card: GTX 670

Driver version: 337.50
dxlevel: see below
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: m0re's highframes
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

So I used dx_level 90 in the first test I did

2639 frames 15.574 seconds 169.45 fps ( 5.90 ms/f) 10.153 fps variability

Then I tested it on dx_level 81

2639 frames 13.921 seconds 189.57 fps ( 5.28 ms/f) 12.324 fps variability

So far nothing unusual right? Well now the weird part begins. I then tried some tests with very low resolutions(didn't give me any fps increase in the end btw) and instantly noticed a significant fps increase on both dx levels. I tried to replicate those results after restarting tf2 but for some reason that seemed to be impossible. After a couple minutes of thinking I finally figured it out:

It was the netgraph.

So I replicated both test from above with the exact same conditions(1080p res as well) and ended up with an astonishing result:

DX90

2639 frames 14.342 seconds 184.00 fps ( 5.43 ms/f) 10.438 fps variability

DX81

2639 frames 12.682 seconds 208.10 fps ( 4.81 ms/f) 12.937 fps variability

So basically setting my net_graph from 3 to 0 increased my average fps by about 15 on both dx levels. I'm not really sure whether this is a demo bug or not. Thoughts?

Alright so I'll bump this thread instead of creating a new one.
I did some benchmarks today and noticed some really weird behaviour.
First of all, my specs:

CPU and overclock: 3770K @ 4.2 GHz
Graphics Card: GTX 670

Driver version: 337.50
dxlevel: see below
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: m0re's highframes
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

So I used dx_level 90 in the first test I did
[code]2639 frames 15.574 seconds 169.45 fps ( 5.90 ms/f) 10.153 fps variability[/code]

Then I tested it on dx_level 81
[code]2639 frames 13.921 seconds 189.57 fps ( 5.28 ms/f) 12.324 fps variability[/code]

So far nothing unusual right? Well now the weird part begins. I then tried some tests with very low resolutions(didn't give me any fps increase in the end btw) and instantly noticed a significant fps increase on both dx levels. I tried to replicate those results after restarting tf2 but for some reason that seemed to be impossible. After a couple minutes of thinking I finally figured it out:

It was the netgraph.

So I replicated both test from above with the exact same conditions(1080p res as well) and ended up with an astonishing result:

DX90
[code]2639 frames 14.342 seconds 184.00 fps ( 5.43 ms/f) 10.438 fps variability[/code]

DX81
[code]2639 frames 12.682 seconds 208.10 fps ( 4.81 ms/f) 12.937 fps variability[/code]

So basically setting my net_graph from 3 to 0 increased my average fps by about 15 on both dx levels. I'm not really sure whether this is a demo bug or not. Thoughts?
123
#123
-1 Frags +

people use net_graph 3? in either case, set it to net_graph 3 and do 3 benchmarks and get an avg, then set to 0 and do another 3 and take the avg, then repeat step 1 and do net_graph 3 benches again and take the avg and see what you come up with

my terrible guess is that tf2 is optimizing some part of the process and that the difference you have described is a result of that optimization. i would imagine there is some penalty for running net_graph 1. i agree, though, 15 fps is a bit high

people use net_graph 3? in either case, set it to net_graph 3 and do 3 benchmarks and get an avg, then set to 0 and do another 3 and take the avg, then repeat step 1 and do net_graph 3 benches again and take the avg and see what you come up with

my terrible guess is that tf2 is optimizing some part of the process and that the difference you have described is a result of that optimization. i would imagine there is some penalty for running net_graph 1. i agree, though, 15 fps is a bit high
124
#124
2 Frags +

Alright did some more tests.

Average fps on dx9 with net_graph 3 (3 tests): 167
Average fps on dx9 with net_graph 0 (3 tests): 184
Average fps on dx8 with net_graph 3 (3 tests): 190
Average fps on dx8 with net_graph 0 (3 tests): 205

The results do not change if I set net_graph to 3 again after I tested it with 0.

Alright did some more tests.

Average fps on dx9 with net_graph 3 (3 tests): 167
Average fps on dx9 with net_graph 0 (3 tests): 184
Average fps on dx8 with net_graph 3 (3 tests): 190
Average fps on dx8 with net_graph 0 (3 tests): 205

The results do not change if I set net_graph to 3 again after I tested it with 0.
125
#125
1 Frags +

Holy shit. How can that be? It's worth also testing cl_showfps 1 and I guess net_graph 1. I never thought that this was possible... I guess it's better not to run that stuff

Holy shit. How can that be? It's worth also testing cl_showfps 1 and I guess net_graph 1. I never thought that this was possible... I guess it's better not to run that stuff
126
#126
0 Frags +
tornados2111Holy shit. How can that be? It's worth also testing cl_showfps 1 and I guess net_graph 1. I never thought that this was possible... I guess it's better not to run that stuff

I just tested it real quick(and only on dx8) so those results might be not too accurate:

Average fps on dx8 with net_graph 1: 197
Average fps on dx8 with cl_showfps 1: 204

So basically cl_showfps doesn't seem to affect fps and net_graph 1 does, although not as bad as net_graph 3

[quote=tornados2111]Holy shit. How can that be? It's worth also testing cl_showfps 1 and I guess net_graph 1. I never thought that this was possible... I guess it's better not to run that stuff[/quote]

I just tested it real quick(and only on dx8) so those results might be not too accurate:

Average fps on dx8 with net_graph 1: 197
Average fps on dx8 with cl_showfps 1: 204

So basically cl_showfps doesn't seem to affect fps and net_graph 1 does, although not as bad as net_graph 3
127
#127
0 Frags +
2639 frames 22.460 seconds 117.50 fps ( 8.51 ms/f) 5.885 fps variability

CPU and overclock: i7-2600k @ 4.00 GHz
Graphics Card: GeForce GTX 760 (light OC)

Driver version: 337.50
dxlevel: 98
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Windowed Fullscreen
FPS configs enabled: Modified Chris High Quality

Additional notes: Two monitors. No ragdolls/gibs. Windows 8. Had Chrome+Firefox open with several tabs open on both.

[code]2639 frames 22.460 seconds 117.50 fps ( 8.51 ms/f) 5.885 fps variability[/code]

CPU and overclock: i7-2600k @ 4.00 GHz
Graphics Card: GeForce GTX 760 (light OC)

Driver version: 337.50
dxlevel: 98
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Windowed Fullscreen
FPS configs enabled: Modified Chris High Quality

Additional notes: Two monitors. No ragdolls/gibs. Windows 8. Had Chrome+Firefox open with several tabs open on both.
128
#128
0 Frags +
2639 frames 23.458 seconds 112.50 fps ( 8.89 ms/f) 12.257 fps variability

CPU and overclock: i3 540 @ 3.9 GHz
Graphics Card: AMD Radeon HD 7750
Driver version: 13.12
dxlevel: 81
Resolution: 1024x768
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris maxframes
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled
Additional notes: 2 monitors. cl_threaded_bone_setup 1 got me 117.5 fps with hyperthreading on, but no difference without hyperthreading.

[code]2639 frames 23.458 seconds 112.50 fps ( 8.89 ms/f) 12.257 fps variability[/code]


CPU and overclock: i3 540 @ 3.9 GHz
Graphics Card: AMD Radeon HD 7750
Driver version: 13.12
dxlevel: 81
Resolution: 1024x768
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris maxframes
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled
Additional notes: 2 monitors. cl_threaded_bone_setup 1 got me 117.5 fps with hyperthreading on, but no difference without hyperthreading.
129
#129
1 Frags +
OLD-PC
2639 frames 33.868 seconds 77.92 fps (12.83 ms/f) 2.560 fps variability

CPU and overclock: Athlon II x4 @ 3.0 GHz (stock)
Graphics Card: Radeon HD 4890 Vapor-X 2GB

Driver version: 13.9
dxlevel (default is 90): 81
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris' Highframes
Shadows enabled/disabled: Disabled

Additional notes: cl_threaded_bone_setup 1, everything closed except AV and Steam (Win7 Pro).
NEW-PC
2639 frames 17.745 seconds 148.72 fps (6.72 ms/f) 7.011 fps variability

CPU and overclock: i5-4670k @ 3.4Ghz (stock)
Graphics Card: GeForce GTX 760 OC 2GB

Driver version: 335.23
dxlevel (default is 90): 95
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris' DX9frames
Shadows enabled/disabled: Disabled

Additional notes: cl_threaded_bone_setup 1, BF4 open and Firefox w/a bunch of tabs (Win8.1 Pro).
[code]OLD-PC
2639 frames 33.868 seconds 77.92 fps (12.83 ms/f) 2.560 fps variability

CPU and overclock: Athlon II x4 @ 3.0 GHz (stock)
Graphics Card: Radeon HD 4890 Vapor-X 2GB

Driver version: 13.9
dxlevel (default is 90): 81
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris' Highframes
Shadows enabled/disabled: Disabled

Additional notes: cl_threaded_bone_setup 1, everything closed except AV and Steam (Win7 Pro).[/code]

[code]NEW-PC
2639 frames 17.745 seconds 148.72 fps (6.72 ms/f) 7.011 fps variability

CPU and overclock: i5-4670k @ 3.4Ghz (stock)
Graphics Card: GeForce GTX 760 OC 2GB

Driver version: 335.23
dxlevel (default is 90): 95
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris' DX9frames
Shadows enabled/disabled: Disabled

Additional notes: cl_threaded_bone_setup 1, BF4 open and Firefox w/a bunch of tabs (Win8.1 Pro).[/code]
130
#130
4 Frags +

It'd be really cool if somebody who posted their benchmarks in this thread previously could do it again to see how much the new patch helps with fps.

It'd be really cool if somebody who posted their benchmarks in this thread previously could do it again to see how much the new patch helps with fps.
131
#131
-1 Frags +
krakowIt'd be really cool if somebody who posted their benchmarks in this thread previously could do it again to see how much the new patch helps with fps.

same config.
before: 65fps
now: 60fps.

'before' is 1/2 of a year though so I don't exactly have a before update / after update

So, well. It got worse long-term.

CPU, clock and graphics card is same as before: Athlon II x4 3.5GHz, HD7950.

[quote=krakow]It'd be really cool if somebody who posted their benchmarks in this thread previously could do it again to see how much the new patch helps with fps.[/quote]
same config.
before: 65fps
now: 60fps.

'before' is 1/2 of a year though so I don't exactly have a before update / after update

So, well. It got worse long-term.

CPU, clock and graphics card is same as before: Athlon II x4 3.5GHz, HD7950.
132
#132
14 Frags +

I figured I could do a couple of benchmarks since there are so many options to go with:

http://puu.sh/9DVa9/c0c0097bcd.png

CPU and overclock: i7-4930K @ 3.4 GHz
Graphics Card: GeForce GTX 780

Driver version: 335.23
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Windowed, noborder

Additional notes: Aero disabled.

Edit:
Just because I really wanted to know the worst possible scenario:
maxquality conifg, dxlevel 98 and 2 Monitors

2639 frames 34.706 seconds 76.04 fps (13.15 ms/f) 4.838 fps variability
I figured I could do a couple of benchmarks since there are so many options to go with:


[img]http://puu.sh/9DVa9/c0c0097bcd.png[/img]


CPU and overclock: i7-4930K @ 3.4 GHz
Graphics Card: GeForce GTX 780

Driver version: 335.23
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Windowed, noborder

Additional notes: Aero disabled.



Edit:
Just because I really wanted to know the worst possible scenario:
maxquality conifg, dxlevel 98 and 2 Monitors

[code]2639 frames 34.706 seconds 76.04 fps (13.15 ms/f) 4.838 fps variability[/code]
133
#133
1 Frags +
2639 frames 26.654 seconds 99.01 fps (10.10 ms/f) 4.340 fps variability

CPU: i7-920 c0 @ 3.92GHz HT on
GPU: 2x ATi 5770 crossfire @ 900/1300
Driver version: 14.6 beta
dxlevel 95, all settings max (HDR on) + 8X MSAA/16XAF
shadows on
no fps configs enabled
Fullscreen 1920x1080
Aero off

[code]2639 frames 26.654 seconds 99.01 fps (10.10 ms/f) 4.340 fps variability[/code]

CPU: i7-920 c0 @ 3.92GHz HT on
GPU: 2x ATi 5770 crossfire @ 900/1300
Driver version: 14.6 beta
dxlevel 95, all settings max (HDR on) + 8X MSAA/16XAF
shadows on
no fps configs enabled
Fullscreen 1920x1080
Aero off
134
#134
-1 Frags +

2639 frames 34.433 seconds 76.64 fps (13.05 ms/f) 4.001 fps variability

CPU: AMD FX-4300 @ Stock (CPU parking disabled)
GPU: Asus GTX 760 DirectCU II OC @ 1134 MHz
Driver ver.: 337.88
DirectX 8
Modified Chris DX9 .cfg (Facial animations enabled, ragdolls enabled, Gibs disabled, Windows Aero enabled, shadows disabled, model and texture details at high/very high, sound quality is high)
Fullscreen 1650 x 1050

Special notes: Demo was sped up on some parts for me too.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edit 1:

2639 frames 34.549 seconds 76.38 fps (13.09 ms/f) 3.839 fps variability

^ With Windows Aero disabled and cl_threaded_bone_setup set to 1 (was 0 before)

oddly enough, I get a bit less FPS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edit 2:

2639 frames 27.929 seconds 94.49 fps (10.58 ms/f) 5.233 fps variability

^ Windows Aero still disabled, cl_thearded_bone_setup back to 0, ragdolls entirely disabled.

gave me a good FPS boost, ragdolls really seem to eat alot of FPS.

2639 frames 34.433 seconds 76.64 fps (13.05 ms/f) 4.001 fps variability


CPU: AMD FX-4300 @ Stock (CPU parking disabled)
GPU: Asus GTX 760 DirectCU II OC @ 1134 MHz
Driver ver.: 337.88
DirectX 8
Modified Chris DX9 .cfg (Facial animations enabled, ragdolls enabled, Gibs disabled, Windows Aero enabled, shadows disabled, model and texture details at high/very high, sound quality is high)
Fullscreen 1650 x 1050

Special notes: Demo was sped up on some parts for me too.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edit 1:

2639 frames 34.549 seconds 76.38 fps (13.09 ms/f) 3.839 fps variability

^ With Windows Aero disabled and cl_threaded_bone_setup set to 1 (was 0 before)

oddly enough, I get a bit less FPS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edit 2:

2639 frames 27.929 seconds 94.49 fps (10.58 ms/f) 5.233 fps variability

^ Windows Aero still disabled, cl_thearded_bone_setup back to 0, ragdolls entirely disabled.

gave me a good FPS boost, ragdolls really seem to eat alot of FPS.
135
#135
-1 Frags +
2639 frames 15.622 seconds 168.93 fps ( 5.92 ms/f) 11.139 fps variability

CPU and overclock: i5-4430
Graphics Card: AMD Radeon HD 7750
Driver version: 14.4
Resolution: 1024x768
Full-screen or windowed: Fullscreen'
dxlevel: 81
Shadows enabled/disabled: Disabled
FPS configs enabled: Chris maxframes with cl_threaded_bone_setup 1

[code]2639 frames 15.622 seconds 168.93 fps ( 5.92 ms/f) 11.139 fps variability[/code]

CPU and overclock: i5-4430
Graphics Card: AMD Radeon HD 7750
Driver version: 14.4
Resolution: 1024x768
Full-screen or windowed: Fullscreen'
dxlevel: 81
Shadows enabled/disabled: Disabled
FPS configs enabled: Chris maxframes with cl_threaded_bone_setup 1
136
#136
0 Frags +

CPU: i7-4790k @ stock (4.0ghz)
Graphics Card: AMD Radeon HD 7850 2GB

dxlevel: 81
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris maxframes
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled
Additional notes: 2 monitors..and I probably need to update graphic drivers. I carried my HD over directly from my old system w/o re-formatting so who knows how optimal this is running.

cl_threaded_bone_setup 0: 2639 frames 14.277 seconds 184.84 fps ( 5.41 ms/f) 10.502 fps variability
C

cl_threaded_bone_setup 1: 2639 frames 12.915 seconds 204.33 fps ( 4.89 ms/f) 10.658 fps variability
C

Quite the improvement over the ole core2duo...and holi hell i've never seen windows boot so fast. Feels like 5 seconds.

CPU: i7-4790k @ stock (4.0ghz)
Graphics Card: AMD Radeon HD 7850 2GB

dxlevel: 81
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris maxframes
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled
Additional notes: 2 monitors..and I probably need to update graphic drivers. I carried my HD over directly from my old system w/o re-formatting so who knows how optimal this is running.

cl_threaded_bone_setup 0: [b]2639 frames 14.277 seconds 184.84 fps ( 5.41 ms/f) 10.502 fps variability
C[/b]

cl_threaded_bone_setup 1: [b]2639 frames 12.915 seconds 204.33 fps ( 4.89 ms/f) 10.658 fps variability
C[/b]

Quite the improvement over the ole core2duo...and holi hell i've never seen windows boot so fast. Feels like 5 seconds.
137
#137
-1 Frags +

CPU: i7-2600k @ stock (4.2ghz)
Graphics Card: ASUS Radeon HD 6970 1GB OC GPU to 1100
SSD Raid 0

dxlevel: 80
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris maxframes
Shadows enabled/disabled: enabled
cl_threaded_bone_setup 1
2639 frames 13.580 seconds 194.34 fps ( 5.15 ms/f) 11.374 fps variability
r_shadows 0
2639 frames 12.582 seconds 209.75 fps ( 4.77 ms/f) 10.164 fps variability

CPU: i7-2600k @ stock (4.2ghz)
Graphics Card: ASUS Radeon HD 6970 1GB OC GPU to 1100
SSD Raid 0

dxlevel: 80
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris maxframes
Shadows enabled/disabled: enabled
cl_threaded_bone_setup 1
2639 frames 13.580 seconds 194.34 fps ( 5.15 ms/f) 11.374 fps variability
r_shadows 0
2639 frames 12.582 seconds 209.75 fps ( 4.77 ms/f) 10.164 fps variability
138
#138
-3 Frags +

CPU: i5 4690K @ stock (3.9GHz)
GPU: Powercolor HD 7870 @ stock

dxlevel: Whatever the highest is. 95 I'm guessing.
Resolution: 1360x768 (poor me)
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS Configs Enabled: None, maxed

2639 frames 23.136 seconds 114.07 fps ( 8.77 ms/f) 4.273 fps variability

Lowest I've seen is 110.

Edit: 2 monitors, aero enabled.

CPU: i5 4690K @ stock (3.9GHz)
GPU: Powercolor HD 7870 @ stock

dxlevel: Whatever the highest is. 95 I'm guessing.
Resolution: 1360x768 (poor me)
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS Configs Enabled: None, maxed


2639 frames 23.136 seconds 114.07 fps ( 8.77 ms/f) 4.273 fps variability

Lowest I've seen is 110.

Edit: 2 monitors, aero enabled.
139
#139
-1 Frags +

For some reason the download won't start after I click "Download"... :/

For some reason the download won't start after I click "Download"... :/
140
#140
0 Frags +

Playing this particular demo crashes my TF2 at what I assume is the end. Anybody know how to fix that?

Playing this particular demo crashes my TF2 at what I assume is the end. Anybody know how to fix that?
141
#141
-1 Frags +

August 30, 2014

  • dx9 config 150.19 fps 8.062 fps variability
  • no cfg 110.50 fps 5.268 fps variability
  • high settings 098.10 fps 3.901 fps variability
  • maxframes + dx81 160.41 fps 8.492 fps variability
  • maxframes + cl_threaded_bone_setup 1 171.25 fps 9.571 fps variability
August 30, 2014
[list]
[*]dx9 config [b]150.19[/b] fps 8.062 fps variability
[*]no cfg [b]110.50[/b] fps 5.268 fps variability
[*]high settings [b]098.10[/b] fps 3.901 fps variability
[*]maxframes + dx81 [b]160.41[/b] fps 8.492 fps variability
[*]maxframes + cl_threaded_bone_setup 1 [b]171.25[/b] fps 9.571 fps variability
[/list]
142
#142
-1 Frags +

anyone with a benchmark saved want to test if the updates in the past year have made a difference? i'd be curious to see it.

edit:

CPU and overclock: i5 3570K @ 4.0 GHz
Graphics Card: AMD Radeon HD 7950

Driver version: 14.6 RC (beta)
dxlevel (default is 90): 95
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris dx9frames, w/ antialiasing etc.
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

Under normal settings, I get 131 FPS on this demo. With Harbl's No Hats Mod, I get 142 FPS. Pretty sweet.
In addition, turning on dx8 and highframes gave 161

anyone with a benchmark saved want to test if the updates in the past year have made a difference? i'd be curious to see it.


edit:

CPU and overclock: i5 3570K @ 4.0 GHz
Graphics Card: AMD Radeon HD 7950

Driver version: 14.6 RC (beta)
dxlevel (default is 90): 95
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris dx9frames, w/ antialiasing etc.
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

Under normal settings, I get 131 FPS on this demo. With Harbl's No Hats Mod, I get 142 FPS. Pretty sweet.
In addition, turning on dx8 and highframes gave 161
143
#143
1 Frags +

Reinstalled windows a few weeks ago. About a week ago I was hitting 147fps in benchmark (compared to 120fps on the 31st December 2013), not launched the game since the update today. I've been using the same graphical config and settings. About to benchmark again.

EDIT: 2639 frames 16.688 seconds 158.14 fps ( 6.32 ms/f) 7.474 fps variability

This means:
December 2013 - 120fps
August 2014 - 147fps
September 2014 - 158fps

Reinstalled windows a few weeks ago. About a week ago I was hitting 147fps in benchmark (compared to 120fps on the 31st December 2013), not launched the game since the update today. I've been using the same graphical config and settings. About to benchmark again.

EDIT: 2639 frames 16.688 seconds 158.14 fps ( 6.32 ms/f) 7.474 fps variability

This means:
December 2013 - 120fps
August 2014 - 147fps
September 2014 - 158fps
144
#144
-1 Frags +
SnowdreamThis means:
December 2013 - 120fps
August 2014 - 147fps
September 2014 - 158fps

Thanks valve!

[quote=Snowdream]This means:
December 2013 - 120fps
August 2014 - 147fps
September 2014 - 158fps[/quote]
Thanks valve!
145
#145
-1 Frags +

2639 frames 28.740 seconds 91.82 fps (10.89 ms/f) 9.617 fps variability

CPU: Intel Pentium @ 3.0 GHz
Graphics Card: Nvidia Geforce 9800 gt
Driver version: Geforce 335.23
dxlevel: 80
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris Maxframes
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

2639 frames 28.740 seconds 91.82 fps (10.89 ms/f) 9.617 fps variability

CPU: Intel Pentium @ 3.0 GHz
Graphics Card: Nvidia Geforce 9800 gt
Driver version: Geforce 335.23
dxlevel: 80
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Chris Maxframes
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled
146
#146
-1 Frags +

The last update improved performance a bit on OS X. I don't have the exact results saved but last I timed this demo a month or two ago I got ~105 fps with maxframes.

With maxframes:
2639 frames 22.619 seconds 116.67 fps ( 8.57 ms/f) 6.399 fps variability

With maxquality:
2639 frames 36.369 seconds 72.56 fps (13.78 ms/f) 8.687 fps variability

CPU: i7-3720QM @ 2.6 GHz
GPU: GeForce GT 650M
OpenGL, fullscreen @ 1440x900

The last update improved performance a bit on OS X. I don't have the exact results saved but last I timed this demo a month or two ago I got ~105 fps with maxframes.

With maxframes:
2639 frames 22.619 seconds 116.67 fps ( 8.57 ms/f) 6.399 fps variability

With maxquality:
2639 frames 36.369 seconds 72.56 fps (13.78 ms/f) 8.687 fps variability

CPU: i7-3720QM @ 2.6 GHz
GPU: GeForce GT 650M
OpenGL, fullscreen @ 1440x900
147
#147
-1 Frags +

2639 frames 21.406 seconds 123.28 fps ( 8.11 ms/f) 5.020 fps variability

CPU and overclock: i7-2600 @ 3.4ghz
Graphics Card: GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Driver version: 306.97
dxlevel (default is 90): 81
Resolution: 1024x768 (stretched 16:9 if anyone cares)
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Custom fps config
Shadows enabled/disabled: enabled (shadows through walls pls)

2639 frames 21.406 seconds 123.28 fps ( 8.11 ms/f) 5.020 fps variability

CPU and overclock: i7-2600 @ 3.4ghz
Graphics Card: GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Driver version: 306.97
dxlevel (default is 90): 81
Resolution: 1024x768 (stretched 16:9 if anyone cares)
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Custom fps config
Shadows enabled/disabled: enabled (shadows through walls pls)
148
#148
-1 Frags +
2639 frames 18.536 seconds 142.37 fps ( 7.02 ms/f) 6.245 fps variability

CPU: i5-4690k @ 3.5ghz
Graphics Card: GeForce GTX 660

Config: Chris' Maxframes
Dxlevel: 81
Shadows: Enabled
Res: 1920x1080
Win/full: Windowed

I kinda thought it would be better than that to be honest

[quote]2639 frames 18.536 seconds 142.37 fps ( 7.02 ms/f) 6.245 fps variability
[/quote]

CPU: i5-4690k @ 3.5ghz
Graphics Card: GeForce GTX 660

Config: Chris' Maxframes
Dxlevel: 81
Shadows: Enabled
Res: 1920x1080
Win/full: Windowed


I kinda thought it would be better than that to be honest
149
#149
-1 Frags +

CPU: i3-3120m @2.50ghz
Graphics Card: intel hd graphics 4000

Config: Chris' Maxframes
Shadows: Enabled
Res: 1366*768
Win/full: full

2639 frames 43.100 seconds 61.23 fps (16.33 ms/f) 2.849 fps variability
dx90 cl_threaded_bone_setup 0

2639 frames 41.828 seconds 63.09 fps (15.85 ms/f) 2.931 fps variability
dx90 cl_threaded_bone_setup 1

2639 frames 39.779 seconds 66.34 fps (15.07 ms/f) 2.949 fps variability
dx81 cl_threaded_bone_setup 0

2639 frames 37.678 seconds 70.04 fps (14.28 ms/f) 3.525 fps variability
dx81 cl_threaded_bone_setup 1

CPU: i3-3120m @2.50ghz
Graphics Card: intel hd graphics 4000

Config: Chris' Maxframes
Shadows: Enabled
Res: 1366*768
Win/full: full

2639 frames 43.100 seconds 61.23 fps (16.33 ms/f) 2.849 fps variability
dx90 cl_threaded_bone_setup 0

2639 frames 41.828 seconds 63.09 fps (15.85 ms/f) 2.931 fps variability
dx90 cl_threaded_bone_setup 1


2639 frames 39.779 seconds 66.34 fps (15.07 ms/f) 2.949 fps variability
dx81 cl_threaded_bone_setup 0

2639 frames 37.678 seconds 70.04 fps (14.28 ms/f) 3.525 fps variability
dx81 cl_threaded_bone_setup 1
150
#150
-1 Frags +

Aero disabled with Rhapsody's Performance Config
2639 frames 69.206 seconds 38.13 fps (26.22 ms/f) 3.250 fps variability
Aero disabled
2639 frames 57.827 seconds 45.64 fps (21.91 ms/f) 2.554 fps variability

CPU: i5-3230M CPU @ 2.60GHz
Graphics Card: Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000
(I'm on a laptop; HP envy dv-7)

Config: Above
Dxlevel: 90
Shadows: Disabled
Res: 1600x900
Win/full: Windowed

I actually had one more fps with Aero enabled without Rhapsody's config.
Also, for some reason, when I removed Rhapsody's config, the demo looked like this - so the broken / lack of motion might just be the difference in frames? Has anyone else experienced this?

Aero disabled with Rhapsody's Performance Config
2639 frames 69.206 seconds 38.13 fps (26.22 ms/f) 3.250 fps variability
Aero disabled
2639 frames 57.827 seconds 45.64 fps (21.91 ms/f) 2.554 fps variability


CPU: i5-3230M CPU @ 2.60GHz
Graphics Card: Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000
(I'm on a laptop; HP envy dv-7)

Config: Above
Dxlevel: 90
Shadows: Disabled
Res: 1600x900
Win/full: Windowed

I actually had one more fps with Aero enabled without Rhapsody's config.
Also, for some reason, when I removed Rhapsody's config, [url=http://38.media.tumblr.com/b33c10246029e5c1ce0ab88017020712/tumblr_nbyobpbLX11s2hcw6o1_1280.png]the demo looked like this[/url] - so the broken / lack of motion might just be the difference in frames? Has anyone else experienced this?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ⋅⋅ 19
Please sign in through STEAM to post a comment.