the301stspartanAnd u are making fallacious assumptions about his language because you don't agree with his argument.
or maybe ive been in mumble with/played against the specific person I'm talking to? did you consider that possibility?
| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561198013620065 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:53354337] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:26677168 |
| Country | Bhutan |
| Signed Up | July 18, 2012 |
| Last Posted | February 6, 2026 at 11:02 AM |
| Posts | 5518 (1.1 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | |
| Windows Sensitivity | |
| Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
|
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | |
| Keyboard | |
| Mousepad | |
| Headphones | |
| Monitor | |
the301stspartanAnd u are making fallacious assumptions about his language because you don't agree with his argument.
or maybe ive been in mumble with/played against the specific person I'm talking to? did you consider that possibility?
Waldosticks and stones may break my bones but words are offensive and therefore must be banned to protect my feelings
tagg never remotely even suggested that anyone should ban any words, he used his own words to combat them, but the irony is lost on you because you're trying like a motherfucker to rationalize your own use of racist language
people will always find a way to mitigate racist remarks and somehow blame the recipient of them because most people hold a lot of bigoted views and simultaneously have a need to see themselves as essentially good so they will never admit fault
nothing tagg can do about that, get off his nuts
KonceptTy mustard for actually being able to admit that some things were right and wrong
It's easier when you only affiliate with the Democratic Party out of necessity when compared to the alternative
I don't consider myself a liberal, I consider myself a progressive and a democratic socialist and I think a lot more Americans feel that way than the Dems are willing to admit
The sad thing is, the conservatives in this thread are so close to being right. They're right about the DNC's idiocy in misunderstanding the anti-establishment bent of this election. They're right about Hillary (whatever you think about her on a personal/political level) being a terrible candidate in a pragmatic sense, who was seemingly only given the job because it felt like "her turn". They're right about the nasty tone of the election coming down to a "corrupt criminal cunt" vs a "bullying bigoted buffoon", which led to a lot of Americans creating a false equivalency between the two and either not turning out to vote or snap voting for 1 of the 2 for pretty unsatisfactory reasons.
The only area where they are wrong is in painting Donald Trump as in any way the solution to any of their problems. Here we have a rich megalomaniac who has spent his entire life only caring that the system stay rigged in his favor (including through, among other things, donating to Clinton), who has misled the angry white working class into thinking he will fight for them, despite having no substantive policy ideas and a complete lack of understanding how the world works.
The American people want populism so much that they voted for the worst possible populist package. Hopefully next time around we can get a true progressive populist, one who can unite poor whites and poor people of color and help them realize how they're being fucked by the corporations of the world.
I'm a big fan of the writing my man Robert Reich has been doing on the election, some of it was pretty prescient:
http://www.alternet.org/economy/robert-reich-why-white-working-class-abandoned-democratic-party
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_revolt_of_the_anxious_class_20151215
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-reich/why-so-many-americans-fee_b_7150874.html
https://www.guernicamag.com/daily/robert-reich-the-end-of-the-establishment/
https://www.facebook.com/RBReich/posts/1361848173827775?pnref=story
catfacehttp://i.imgur.com/1ZFIwnR.png
this is the first time since 1928 that republicans have held the house, the senate, and the presidency
gee what happened in 1928 I wonder. . .
SpaceCadetCleepopleSpaceCadetBoomfan56Have models ever been this wrong before? The chance of Trump winning went from like 20% everywhere to he's the president in like a day.
Your first mistake was listening to the biased media outlets. None of them wanted Trump to win or even do well.
Anyone educated and with half a brain didn't want Trump to win :)
so basically over 50% of the country. Fucking retards
that's a conservative estimate for how many idiots there are in america
of course hillary still wins the popular vote
and people wonder why the democrats cant get anyone to turn out
tojoFFygYall need to calm down, this is still very much up in the air. This election is decided by Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. All 3 are too close to call and their's still a long way to go.Yea and there's still hope with Cali having a super pro Hilary push
what are you talking about
we don't have national popular vote lol, california is literally irrelevant
Rafffi was following the election from France and every poll i saw before the election was saying hillary will won
Even that graphic on the new york times ....
http://i.imgur.com/LiooVA1.jpg
How did they fail so bad ???
combination of unpredictable voter turnout, standard margin of error, and people lying about who they're voting for to appear less racist
bleghfarecholy shit this thread is partisan as fuck
deal with it you baby
you know if donald trump wins the fucking democratic establishment is just gonna blame progressives for not lining up behind clinton
even though they did everything they could to shit on the progressive wing of the democratic party for years and alienate their base
then again, even though it's obvious trump is winning ohio, the sheer amount he's winning by makes michigan and wisconsin suddenly relevant
whymeoVirginia doesn't matter if she can't win Michigan.
michigan always swings late because of detroit
but if she doesn't get nevada or new hampshire she literally can't get 270 electoral votes