funhaver1998why not just practice medic arrows?
because iso has good arrows and I'm trying to figure out how
| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561198006886607 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:46620879] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:23310439 |
| Country | Korea, Republic of |
| Signed Up | October 2, 2012 |
| Last Posted | November 8, 2025 at 6:47 AM |
| Posts | 2382 (0.5 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | 1.945 (9.4"/360) |
| Windows Sensitivity | 6 |
| Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
900 |
Resolution |
1920x1080 |
Refresh Rate |
144hz |
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | DeathAdder 2013 |
| Keyboard | Microsoft Rubber Dome, i ctap w/ RMB |
| Mousepad | Steel Series QCK (http://imgur.com/qim8wA2) |
| Headphones | Audio Technica ATH700x but not the black |
| Monitor | Benq panel that everyone else has idr |
funhaver1998why not just practice medic arrows?
because iso has good arrows and I'm trying to figure out how
They travel at basically the same speed and have similar drop. Would pubbing as Rescue Ranger engineer to practice medic arrows be a good idea?
HuckNub_DanishHuckI like how this fucking idiot says "im not racist, I was just asking a question" but if you go through his post history you find nice old white supremacy shit likewhere in my post did i say whites were superior
http://i.imgur.com/IOKvv10.png
You are cancer and should probably just leave this community you piece of shit
The entire "races can be genetically superior" was invented by social darwinists who believed that whites conquered the world because they are genetically superior. "Superior genetic traits" can't belong to a race because the entire idea of race itself is based on genetic traits that are independent from other things like higher muscle mass and intelligence. For example, saying that white people have a higher intelligence is incorrect because the genetic trait that gives you white skin has absolutely no effect on someone's IQ.
Although judging from how close minded all your posts are you probably haven't actually sat down for more than 5 minutes and thought about what you are saying,
You're 100% correct that skin and other traits have zero correlation and its a justification from racists etc etc but:
saying that existing genetic traits or tendencies can't exist in populations or that skin color isn't a very visual one that can be (usually poorly) used to classify groups together is going too far to the other extreme. Genetic variation in humans is surprisingly low (~1/10th that of chimpanzees for example), but certain genetic groups do have certain genetic advantages in very specific tasks. Muscle insertions are ~80%+ genetic and 100% uncontrollable but can lead to vastly different leverages when it comes to certain athletic events. Its why Eastern Europeans and Northern Asians have an advantage in certain weightlifting sports (hip joint + muscle attachments) and why West Africans have an advantage in running sports. Its why its been a long time since a white guy was the 100m WR. So on that count, racists are right, certain populations are genetically predisposed to certain tasks. The part most of them miss is how unbelievably small these differences are. Only one white guy has broken a 10 second 100m, but a shitload can break a 10.6. Saying that race affects a ~5% (far less than a σ) difference in maximum speed among the very top individuals of a given sport or activity is fine. Saying race affects a 1-2σ in things like general intelligence when comparing the entire population is pretty suspect but could have validity with sufficient proof. Saying race affects intelligence in any meaningful way in 2016 when there have been numerous studies showing the correlation between SES vs IQ and SES vs Race, the closing of the IQ gap, and the general uptrend of IQ of all minority groups relative to the whole population goes beyond you being dumb, it shows that you're only willing to support science when it agrees with your preconceived notions.
so yeah, fuck racists i guess
EDIT: also if yr justification for being a racist is that a black guy said some dumb shit like "kill racists", you're not a very good racist since you're just falling to an equal level of stupid (at best)
tfw yr internet stops existing mid match
Viperggs to wut dude
sucks elliot kept spiking to 150+ the second half but it's w/e
very good game yeah, just bummed my internet turned what could've been a 3 or 4-5 match into a much shorter one.
springrollsjust my opinion but holy shit jump_pagoda is awful
Pagoda is fun except for like 3 jumps but all 3 are just so AIDS they make the map not fun
saving invite killin livers
STOGESome of these are good ideas, but others are just lowering the skill ceiling of the game IMO
If they were MM only that'd work I suppose, but if the slugs of pub servers want to be good at the game, they should learn to be good at the game - not rely on some hud element or something.
Think about Quake Live where they implemented the hud timers for the pickups, pissed a lot of people off because that was always a fundamental part in why the game was so hard to learn and what not. These ideas aren't nearly as close as this, but lowering the skill ceiling at all is never really a good approach imo.
Lowering a skill ceiling doesn't mean that the game is worse because of it. As an abstract example: if a sniper who maintained 100% HS accuracy for 25 shots was immediately kicked by the server, the skill ceiling would be lowered, but it could be a good change because it would only affect hackers. Some of these changes might make the game easier to learn and therefore less skill indexed, but you have to consider 1.) do you want TF2 to be based on who's memorized the most obscure gameplay features and 2.) would you sacrifice a bit of the skill ceiling in an attempt to draw more players into the game?
dom_canalzone failed partially because the gamemode wasn't amazing but also because the map itself was way too big, way too confusing, and way too weird to really work. Even with 18 players you could go >30 seconds as a flank class without seeing anyone, and most caps would go uncontested. It misses the benefit of a 3 Dom style: nearly constant fighting.
CTF doesn't work in TF2 because no one's made a CTF map since 2009 and TF2 doesn't have touch flag return. The maps are shit and its hard to make good ones because the gamem mode wont let you play CTF in the best competitive way. Touch return lets playing aggressive and chasing the flag carrier be a better option than turtling and preventing your flag from leaving your base.
mild shitpost sorry, but someone mentioned pub players being unable to understand that mid caps slower than other points and I wanted to make a nerd post:
there's a lot of shit in tf2 that is horribly unintuitive or awkward, especially in a competitive format, so in the interest of making the game easier to understand and learn (in the interest of making MM more successful), here's a list of a relatively simple changes that I think could benefit the game in this regard. Most of them are HUD related in some way, because I think the TF2 HUD wasn't designed with all the unlocks in mind and it really shows. Some of the changes would also be most useful when looking at POVs or streams when being able to tell at a glance what loadout is used can be helpful. Most wouldnt be useful to the average Open player but w/e, I think this is something the comp community should be emphasizing the importance of to valve.
General:
Demo:
Medic:
MM HUD:
There's a lot of other things that could be more readable in TF2 (my actual list is ~3x as long as this one) but this is mostly stuff that's either recurrently unnoticed in MM and lobbies or shit that I don't notice when I'm watching a stream. Thanks :)
it would take 8:20 to hit the mercy rule score with 2 points, 5:30 with 3. You're looking at ~3-4 minutes of most open matches being spawn camps which isn't very exciting. It seems like it'd be fun for close games, but any game that isn't close will just be boring or frustrating, and around halfway through the other team will have such a big point advantage that you'll be able to call the map.
r u implying u have to be smart to be good at tf2? Its not like its a game that benefits people who are smart in a real world sense
peltyeah you could just get someone with a brain to micro you
but its gonna be really hard to ever really understand whats going on in a game if you only ever see your own point of view
So outside of anecdotes I guess this is the best answer anyone is going to be able to provide, but it still feels kinda inconclusive imo. I don't think you can really call someone who has no understanding of TF2 a good TF2 player for example. Even the people named in the thread as examples of not really studying still put some time into reviewing their gameplay and I don't know that people regard yomps and yz50 as tf2 masterminds. On the other end you have players that are strong casters and have a good understanding of tf2 (especially as spectators) but have little practical ability and struggle to work their understanding into the game. You could conclude that understanding TF2 doesn't confer the ability to play it, but could players that focused only on playing have learned more by doing outside study or did they develop a strong understanding of TF2 only by playing it? Are there parts of TF2 that you can't understand in game and require a spectators POV?
I thought it was an interesting question but no one cared i guess rip or maybe i was just bad at asking it.
that isn't cringe, the anti heavy circlejerk is cringier than the people who defend heavy
yre closer but not really because like the question wasn't "can you improve without playing tf2" but was more "can you improve to a high level without answering the previous question"
Is it feasible for a player to be a high level player while only practicing TF2 by playing it? Can you actually MGE or pug your way into invite? Can you see your flaws well enough in game that reviewing demos isn't necessary?