Yeah it fucking sucks to play new maps where people are trying different strats out and you actively have to think to come up with pushes/holds. I'd much rather play maps that have been in the game for 10 years and every game plays out exactly the same with your team trying to send the same few sacs/pushes against the same fully optimized hold that everyone does until something works, that's ideal gameplay right there.
| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561198010239925 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:49974197] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:24987098 |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Signed Up | August 20, 2014 |
| Last Posted | October 16, 2026 at 1:09 PM |
| Posts | 1699 (0.4 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | nice |
| Windows Sensitivity | the princess |
| Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
over |
Resolution |
a picnic |
Refresh Rate |
luigi? |
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | of |
| Keyboard | to |
| Mousepad | invite us |
| Headphones | for |
| Monitor | eh |
I'm glad someone decided to do this. Was actually thinking about this the other day and something I realized is it might be against the twitch TOS as you're exclusively streaming content made by other people. Look into that before trying it because it might be fine, streaming on another service is also always a possibility.
THEBILLDOZERwhat the FUCK is a sunchoke
Theyre a really earthy tasting root vegetable, kind of hard to describe the taste but theyre pretty good. Make you fart like nothing else though.
ReeroZestyhttps://twitter.com/ccchristtt/status/1163722922571292672https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50B53l9SHtI
Do Greenland players get better ping to NA or EU servers?
I fucking hate exile
Just wanted 2 say I looked at all the names of the people posting in this thread and im not gonna read any of the posts lol
hooliyeah m8 gotta watch those 60 fps asmr vids on your secondary 144hz
What if hes playing on the same team with 2 accounts at the same time.
ZestyJesus Must Be Eliminated.
Doom1You know jack shit about science if you link study that's behind a paywall as an argument.
Researchers generally don't benefit financially from studies being locked behind paywalls either. Academic publishers like Elsevier make a 40% profit margins, while they're asking scientists to do the peer review process for free. In any case, if you want to see the article you can always go on sci-hub (this article is available for free there).
Open access journals are actually less trustworthy in some cases because a lot of publishers have a model where you have to pay to have your study be open access. This will often incentivize the publisher to publish the article even if it's not very good, which sucks because I do think science shouldn't be behind paywalls.
All that being said, people should be skeptical of any article they read because a lot of absolute bullshit makes it through peer review.