Sometimes I will accidently press right click and it will stop me from auto reloading/firing my weapon. Does anyone know where this issue comes from or how to fix it?
Right click stopping m1
posted in
Q/A Help
Sometimes I will accidently press right click and it will stop me from auto reloading/firing my weapon. Does anyone know where this issue comes from or how to fix it?
Should I just remove +attack2 in my class cfgs on classes that don't need it?
Should I just remove +attack2 in my class cfgs on classes that don't need it?
LupusShould I stop shitting myself if I don't need to?
?
[quote=Lupus]Should I stop shitting myself if I don't need to?[/quote]
?
?
Brimstonethe answer to both questions is yes
by telling them, you are part of the problem
[quote=Brimstone]the answer to both questions is yes[/quote]
by telling them, you are part of the problem
by telling them, you are part of the problem
This fucks up some random stuff you might be doing, but maybe it helps:
Show Content
alias +m2action "+attack2;+reload"
alias -m2action "-attack2;-reload"
alias +m2 "alias checkm2 +m2action;checkm1"
alias -m2 "alias checkm2;-m2action"
alias +m1 "alias checkm1;-m2action;+attack"
alias -m1 "alias checkm1 +m2action;checkm2;-attack"
alias checkm1
alias checkm2
bind mouse1 +m1
bind mouse2 +m2
alias -m2action "-attack2;-reload"
alias +m2 "alias checkm2 +m2action;checkm1"
alias -m2 "alias checkm2;-m2action"
alias +m1 "alias checkm1;-m2action;+attack"
alias -m1 "alias checkm1 +m2action;checkm2;-attack"
alias checkm1
alias checkm2
bind mouse1 +m1
bind mouse2 +m2
This fucks up some random stuff you might be doing, but maybe it helps:
[spoiler]alias +m2action "+attack2;+reload"
alias -m2action "-attack2;-reload"
alias +m2 "alias checkm2 +m2action;checkm1"
alias -m2 "alias checkm2;-m2action"
alias +m1 "alias checkm1;-m2action;+attack"
alias -m1 "alias checkm1 +m2action;checkm2;-attack"
alias checkm1
alias checkm2
bind mouse1 +m1
bind mouse2 +m2[/spoiler]
[spoiler]alias +m2action "+attack2;+reload"
alias -m2action "-attack2;-reload"
alias +m2 "alias checkm2 +m2action;checkm1"
alias -m2 "alias checkm2;-m2action"
alias +m1 "alias checkm1;-m2action;+attack"
alias -m1 "alias checkm1 +m2action;checkm2;-attack"
alias checkm1
alias checkm2
bind mouse1 +m1
bind mouse2 +m2[/spoiler]
RicoThis fucks up some random stuff you might be doing, but maybe it helps
the opposite of the null-cancelling movement script
[quote=Rico]This fucks up some random stuff you might be doing, but maybe it helps[/quote]
the opposite of the null-cancelling movement script
the opposite of the null-cancelling movement script
mastercomsRicoThis fucks up some random stuff you might be doing, but maybe it helps
the opposite of the null-cancelling movement script
Would be nice if someone like you could give us a solution instead of making fun of someone who tried? No? (Simps incoming)
[quote=mastercoms][quote=Rico]This fucks up some random stuff you might be doing, but maybe it helps[/quote]
the opposite of the null-cancelling movement script[/quote]
Would be nice if someone like you could give us a solution instead of making fun of someone who tried? No? (Simps incoming)
the opposite of the null-cancelling movement script[/quote]
Would be nice if someone like you could give us a solution instead of making fun of someone who tried? No? (Simps incoming)
Rev3(Simps incoming)
bro do you even know what simp means?
[quote=Rev3](Simps incoming)[/quote] bro do you even know what simp means?
Rev3Would be nice if someone like you could give us a solution instead of making fun of someone who tried? No? (Simps incoming)
I'm not sure that was the impression I wanted to make. I was just being lighthearted since I thought that would be the solution. I found it funny that we already have a script for making sure an input is received even if you have the opposing button pressed, and now Rico made a script to make sure of the opposite, where it makes sure an input is not received if you have the opposing button pressed.
But really, given your comments, I doubt you really wanted to say anything constructive and were just waiting to say that to me. Now, I hope it was cathartic and you're relieved of whatever pain you had.
[quote=Rev3]Would be nice if someone like you could give us a solution instead of making fun of someone who tried? No? (Simps incoming)[/quote]
I'm not sure that was the impression I wanted to make. I was just being lighthearted since I thought that would be the solution. I found it funny that we already have a script for making sure an input is received even if you have the opposing button pressed, and now Rico made a script to make sure of the opposite, where it makes sure an input is not received if you have the opposing button pressed.
But really, given your comments, I doubt you really wanted to say anything constructive and were just waiting to say that to me. Now, I hope it was cathartic and you're relieved of whatever pain you had.
I'm not sure that was the impression I wanted to make. I was just being lighthearted since I thought that would be the solution. I found it funny that we already have a script for making sure an input is received even if you have the opposing button pressed, and now Rico made a script to make sure of the opposite, where it makes sure an input is not received if you have the opposing button pressed.
But really, given your comments, I doubt you really wanted to say anything constructive and were just waiting to say that to me. Now, I hope it was cathartic and you're relieved of whatever pain you had.
Please
sign in through STEAM
to post a comment.