HamiI think paying the AC would be TO get more people on the staff. Based on what we know of the AC job, it sounds like it's a tough job and clearly, there aren't many people offering to volunteer. And it's also extremely important. So paying people to do AC would be a win/win
to be brief, i don't think this is the right line of thinking. plenty of people apply to RGL AC, its just that very few are ever accepted to due RGLs rightfully rigorous interview process. Offering awful pay is more likely to attract kids than actual professionals. id rather they rethink their AC structure so that Good Samaritan™ eye testers could better help more important/blatant cheating cases reach a higher priority in their queue without needing to resort TFTV threads or without needing to commit dozens of hours to studying the blade of AC to make it onto the team themselves.