Upvote Upvoted 23 Downvote Downvoted
1 2 3
ETF2L S24 UBF: nameLess vs. Full Tilt
posted in Matches
61
#61
3 Frags +
smziUnfortunately though most players nowadays only know one GeaR and think that they are the next clockwork(w+m1 always win),

maybe this is the solution

[quote=smzi]Unfortunately though most players nowadays only know one [b][u]GeaR[/u][/b] and think that they are the next clockwork(w+m1 always win), [/quote]
maybe this is the solution
62
#62
2 Frags +

Ok maybe I shouldnt be blaming nameless but the other teams for not figuring out how to counter this. If the other teams can figure out how to counter it, nameless have to change their playstyle.

I apologize if I upset anyone.

Ok maybe I shouldnt be blaming nameless but the other teams for not figuring out how to counter this. If the other teams can figure out how to counter it, nameless have to change their playstyle.

I apologize if I upset anyone.
63
#63
5 Frags +

imo slow playstyle is the result of nameless sticking together for a long time now. As they've played together for what, one year, they've built a solid playstyle, with everyone being really important in their mechanics, not overextending and playing for the team.
When you make a new team, you dont have solid chemistry or a strong maincall, therefore your plays are somewhat messy, and an agressive playstyle tends to compensate for these moments when you dont know what to do. No plan ? Everyone jumps in and you just hope for the best.

Nameless is the strongest team in EU because they play as a team. Im pretty sure an agressive but coordinate playstyle may beat them, but playing as unit while being agressive is way harder than playing passive as a unit. As there arent many established teams (as in, old teams), a passive team is the best and "easiest" way to be the best team. If teams sticked together for a long time and had better coordination, Nameless would surely have to change the way they play.

In the end, nameless isnt to be blamed, other teams are.

imo slow playstyle is the result of nameless sticking together for a long time now. As they've played together for what, one year, they've built a solid playstyle, with everyone being really important in their mechanics, not overextending and playing for the team.
When you make a new team, you dont have solid chemistry or a strong maincall, therefore your plays are somewhat messy, and an agressive playstyle tends to compensate for these moments when you dont know what to do. No plan ? Everyone jumps in and you just hope for the best.

Nameless is the strongest team in EU because they play as a team. Im pretty sure an agressive but coordinate playstyle may beat them, but playing as unit while being agressive is way harder than playing passive as a unit. As there arent many established teams (as in, old teams), a passive team is the best and "easiest" way to be the best team. If teams sticked together for a long time and had better coordination, Nameless would surely have to change the way they play.

In the end, nameless isnt to be blamed, other teams are.
64
#64
3 Frags +
DavidTheWinIt's possible to dislike the status quo of slow boring games but not be able to offer suggestions on how to improve it

Watch Zebbosai demos

[quote=DavidTheWin]It's possible to dislike the status quo of slow boring games but not be able to offer suggestions on how to improve it[/quote]
Watch Zebbosai demos
Please sign in through STEAM to post a comment.