pastaThat SPAM pastaThat THIS pastaThat NOODLE pastaThat TO pastaThat HELP pastaThat SKADOODLE

that would make this the third time, since envy got stomped by gambit at Columbus.

and i think it's a little disingenuous to point at a performance from nearly 4 years ago as a reason that a team should be anything but underwhelming now.

?????

mouz = russian ?

Our boy is in the most recent Thorin video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAvVbHzU-N0

it's the old Eleague intermission music

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy9MeObbrpw&t=400s

in simple terms, this bug allows a program on a computer to access all of the memory on a computer without having to ask, meaning that it can see anything on your computer, including passwords, sensitive information, or anything else it might want. And because this is a hardware bug and not a software one, it affects literally everything with this hardware in it, including banking websites, google, amazon, or in short: everything. This means that an attacker can take any information that they want from anywhere that they want, and that's really really extraordinarily bad.

that is unrelated to Meltdown or Spectre, the attacks in this thread. But it's never a bad idea to make sure that you aren't vulnerable to security holes, and if you are, how to mitigate them.

Have the foo fighters always been a meme band and I never noticed?

I was under the impression that comp changes were pretty close to complete from the way they talked about it after Jungle Inferno, guess not.

Oh well, it's only as bad as last year.

someone saying no

https://steamcommunity.com/id/3875409q3187509

Net Neutrality is a non-partisan issue that has no good arguments against it. The only argument you can make against the 2015 Net Neutrality order is that the principles of Net Neutrality (those being No Blocking, No Throttling, and No Paid Prioritization) are not legitimate for some reason or another, (despite the fact that the order itself provided actual evidence that held up in a court of law, but who cares? why would I ever read a legal document to know what it actually says?). Everything else is pure ideology mired in misinformation and outright lies. Net Neutrality makes no statements on who can be an internet provider, it only says that internet providers are not allowed to block lawful traffic, throttle lawful traffic, have 'fast-lanes,' or hide any information that would allow a consumer to make an informed decision on their purchase of internet service.

The FCC has been trying to enforce Net Neutrality since its first policy statement on the Internet in 2005, and have been committed to protecting openness and transparency on communications networks since 1968. Between the 2005 policy statement and the 2015 Net Neutrality order, the FCC was caught in legal battles that ultimately ruled that the FCC was doing the right thing, but lacked the regulatory authority to enforce the rules that they were trying to anyway. The 2015 Net Neutrality order was the culmination of Ten years of legal battles that showed the FCC lacked the regulatory authority to enforce the rules that had been laid down under the Bush administration, and which reflected over 40 years of action in protecting openness and transparency in the market. The FCC's hand was forced by the pre-existing structure of the 1934 Communications act, the 1996 Telecommunications act, and their own rulings on the internet in particular. It exists as a consequences of pre-existing rules, not as a set of new rules designed only for the purpose of government over-reach.

Here are links to some of the FCC's previous policy statements and Orders on the Internet, as well as the 1996 Telecommunications act, the 1968 Carterfone Decision, and the 1934 Communications act.

You can get most of it from just reading the 2015 Order, though. Of particular note should be pages 18 to 34, which provides a history of FCC decisions regarding the internet and communication dating back to 1968, as well as the justification for enforcing these rules.

There are no non-aids PUGs in CS. Faceit and CEVO are both free, and therefore full of aids players, and ESEA is ESEA, and so it's also full of aids players too.

PUGs with randoms will always be aids because there's no punishment for being the most toxic player on the planet, you can just re-cue and never see the people whose match you ruined ever again. And as a result everyone goes into every match expecting aids, and so when anything goes even a little bit wrong, they immediately jump to maximum toxicity, because that's how they expected the game to go anyway. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Either make lots of friends and only play 5mans, join a community that does in-house 10mans with captains and the like, join a team and scrim a lot, or do all three, or any combination therein.

Just don't play PUGs in CS:GO, it'll drive you insane.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBn9oNxatdg

this year wasn't as bad as past years, but there's a lot of room for improvement. I think i'm gonna try and go back to school next year.

ily vecc, good thread <3

The 3470k is just ancient, it's not a bad cpu. what gpu are you running? are all your drivers up to date?

Will the Avengers learn to fight as a team and defeat Thanos? or will they learn to fight as a team and fail anyway?

Find out next time on Learning to Fight as a Team 3: Thanos and the Hand of Fate.