AimIsADickhttps://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/19/science/how-linguists-and-missionaries-share-a-bible-of-6912-languages.html
18 year old article. This also again notes religious complaints about the publisher without noting any religious complaints about Ethnologue itself. The only complaints about Ethnologue are that it may overcount or undercount languages, which is a practically unsolvable issue (and also secular).
In the future, please READ SOURCES BEFORE LINKING THEM and then explain them in the post. I enjoy reading them and responding myself but it's a pain for other users that don't want to read multiple articles per post only to realize they are irrelevant or don't support your points. In the future, I will just remind you to read sources before citing them instead of reading them for you
AimIsADickHere: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/world-s-largest-linguistics-database-getting-too-expensive-some-researchers, I cited this earlier too.
Also this: https://humans-who-read-grammars.blogspot.com/2019/11/ethnologue-changes-access-again.html
First article does not mention anything about Ethnologue's sources. Second article mentions it once to say that Ethnologue does provide sources but for some pages you have to request the sources from Ethnologue. I don't think it's an actual problem.
AimIsADickI can just repeat the same greeting again, but very slowly. (i didn't agree to use that particular sentence, it'd be too long.)
This casts further doubt on your Esperanto abilities. Please read and translate the longer sentence I provided to prove that you aren't reading from google translate or just speaking spanish (again)
AimIsADickhttp://claudepiron.free.fr/articlesenanglais/europeanorasiatic.htm
Blatant Esperantist puff piece with no validity