Trump trailing 68-48 after the first quarter. Should stay away from shooting that 3 and keep driving the lane.
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561197993619469 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:33353741] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:16676870 |
Country | United States |
Signed Up | May 13, 2013 |
Last Posted | June 23, 2025 at 10:52 PM |
Posts | 2099 (0.5 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
Nub_DanishSpaceCadetI don't think we deserve someone as good as trey gowdySearchlightNub_Danishvote for trump boys if he wins they'll just kill him off and you can get a new president after hes dead
if you vote hillary your stuck with her
Pence might honestly be even worse than Trump, if only because Pence isn't as utterly incompetent.
I might write in Tery Gowdy
Probably true. Once you start watching Tery Gowdy clips on youtube, you tend to keep watching. He absolutely destroys most people.
CNN treats every election night like following football scores on Sunday.
SearchlightNub_Danishvote for trump boys if he wins they'll just kill him off and you can get a new president after hes dead
if you vote hillary your stuck with her
Pence might honestly be even worse than Trump, if only because Pence isn't as utterly incompetent.
I might write in Tery Gowdy
Searchlighthttp://www.270towin.com/presidential_map_new/maps/ymel2.png
Thinking Clinton takes Florida and Nevada, not sure about some of the northern states or Arizona. I've got a couple of bottles of kellerbier ready, but Florida is probably gonna take too long to be counted for me to stay up.
I don't think that map includes all the possible votes.
ppl need to throw some predictions out there to make this more fun.
Anyone who nails the final count, I'll give them a duplicate cosmetic from my inventory.
I think 297-214 for Clinton
This tool might make it easier to throw an accurate prediction
http://www.cnn.com/election/interactive-electoral-college-map/
Better write that prediction in your post, no editing maps and shit after the election is over. :)
sacshot game tonight: bourbon whiskey shot for every red state blu state very old port
result come in, chug the remainder of my absinthe bottle.
rip liver.
What are you going to drink if McMullin happens to win Utah?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election
Really interesting looking at the biggest landslide elections in history, especially the ones over 500.
Franklin D. Roosevelt was a beast, nobody stood a chance against him.
1984 -- Ronald Reagan (Republican) – 525 ----- Walter Mondale (Democratic) – 13
1972 -- Richard Nixon (Republican) – 520 ----- George McGovern (Democratic) – 17
1936 -- Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic) – 523 ----- Alf Landon (Republican) – 8
1820 -- James Monroe (Democratic-Republican) – 228/231 ----- John Quincy Adams (Democratic-Republican) – 1
Never knew there was also a tie way back:
1800 -- Thomas Jefferson (Democratic-Republican) – 73 ----- Aaron Burr** (Democratic-Republican) – 73
SpuPhiladelphia Phillies. 2046 Word Series. You heard it here first.
We had long drought snapped in 2008. Seems like yesterday I was on Broad Street celebrating. Hopefully your prediction is very wrong :)
eeeThe real goal should be elect someonw who hasnt done bad things
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.
ibkfapsSpaceCadetThat could all be true but the most important factor is that nobody knows what agenda WikiLeaks is working in this case.
I think the biggest impact possible would be for Clinton to get elected amid all this building controversy then have a sitting president get charged with a crime and possibly put on trial and impeached.
The big question is "why would WikiLeaks want to help Donald Trump win?". They don't seem to have any dirt on him, at least no dirt on the level of Clinton so who knows.
People questioned wikileaks on why they have no dirt on Trump and their answer was that there is nothing they can leak that is more controversial than what Donald Trump says on a daily basis.
Wouldn't that mean that Trump is more transparent (what people want) and Clinton is secretive and wants to cover-up everything she has done (what ppl don't want)?
GentlemanJonWith the current poll situation if Wikileaks has anything truly explosive to publish then there's a good chance that it will swing the election in Trump's favour. However I think if they had the ammo they'd have used it already. It doesn't make sense to indulge in such brinkmanship with an election date, if manipulating the election is their agenda they'd want to allow time for the Trump campaign to properly exploit the material and disseminate it's most lurid interpretations.
Time is running short for something like that to come together coherently. Although there'd be an initial feeding frenzy it wouldn't support the kind of sustained development of an attacking narrative the Trump campaign would want. If they do have the emails and their contents were disappointingly benign then a late release might make sense - the longer Wikileaks waits the less likely they are to contain anything new or interesting, or of course the less likely they have them at all.
That could all be true but the most important factor is that nobody knows what agenda WikiLeaks is working in this case.
I think the biggest impact possible would be for Clinton to get elected amid all this building controversy then have a sitting president get charged with a crime and possibly put on trial and impeached.
The big question is "why would WikiLeaks want to help Donald Trump win?". They don't seem to have any dirt on him, at least no dirt on the level of Clinton so who knows.
I didn't want the Cubs to win for several reasons but when you comeback from 3-1 you deserve all the credit.
Great series win.