You really have to think of things in the correct context. Era played matters a shit ton and you are not giving it the proper importance IMO. If you choose to devalue the Era played, then this list is not going to make any sense to you for good reason.
The stats tery posts next to each players name are just really "fun stats" that are nice to see and read at a glance when reviewing the article. They are not the end all determining factors in any way but they are typically the only thing referenced when posts are made saying "omg dude is #87th but has same stats as #56".
Its like trying to compare Bryce Harper to Mickey Mantle. In just about every quantitative way, Harper is the superior baseball player. He is faster, stronger, better trained, better baseball education, etc. However, you will not find a single person who knows any history that would rate Bryce above Mantle. In time, its still possible for Bryce to surpass Mantle but its going to take a long time and many great seasons.
The same logic is for all the comments you make about branslam and other "RGL era" players. At this time (today) they are where they are in the long complex history of TF2. In time, they would and will probably make their way up but it takes success over many seasons against quality competition.