If you're not in too much of a hurry, new AMD cards coming soon™.

1. Why a 6700K and not a 7700K?
2. Unless the 16 GB RAM you purchased are DDR4, unusable with the 3570K (in which case why the fuck did you buy them?), they will not be compatible with any new CPU.
3. For streaming a 1600/1700 is guaranteed to be better than a 6700K/7700K.
4. Mobos that allow for overclocking the 6700K/7700K are guaranteed to be more expensive.
5. For a 6700K/7700K you will also have to buy a cooler.
6. A 6700K/7700K is guaranteed to be more expensive than a 1600.

So unless you're going to use it for something where a 6700K/7700K would actually be faster you're just going to pay a lot more for less.
Your money though, I can send you my paypal adress if you need to get rid of some.

#2368
Something like this then.
PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel - Core i7-7700K 4.2GHz Quad-Core Processor ($326.49 @ OutletPC)
CPU Cooler: Enermax - ETS-T40F-BK 76.0 CFM CPU Cooler ($40.88 @ OutletPC)
Motherboard: ASRock - Z270M Pro4 Micro ATX LGA1151 Motherboard ($113.45 @ OutletPC)
Memory: G.Skill - Ripjaws V Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2800 Memory ($109.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: SK hynix - SL308 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($77.89 @ OutletPC)
Storage: Seagate - BarraCuda 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($42.49 @ Amazon)
Video Card: Zotac - GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB AMP Extreme Video Card ($759.99 @ Amazon)
Case: Thermaltake - Core V21 MicroATX Mini Tower Case ($59.99 @ Amazon)
Power Supply: EVGA - SuperNOVA G3 550W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply ($64.99 @ Newegg)
Operating System: Microsoft - Windows 10 Home OEM 64-bit ($89.89 @ OutletPC)
Monitor: BenQ - XL2411 24.0" 1920x1080 144Hz Monitor ($289.00 @ Amazon)
Total: $1975.05
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-06-29 17:39 EDT-0400

Case and monitor are obviously just one possible option each. You could get a better cooler but Kaby Lake chokes on its heat without delidding and delidded there's not a whole lot of wattage to cool so better cooler won't make much of a difference either way. Larger SSD/HDD if you want/need it.

#2369
Rough sketch, will improve on that if he likes the concept.
PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz 6-Core Processor (€249.90 @ Amazon France)
CPU Cooler: CRYORIG - H7 49.0 CFM CPU Cooler (€50.02 @ Amazon France)
Motherboard: ASRock - AB350M Pro4 Micro ATX AM4 Motherboard (€88.69 @ Amazon France)
Memory: G.Skill - Ripjaws V Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 Memory (€139.30 @ Amazon France)
Storage: Samsung - 850 EVO-Series 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive (€96.00 @ Amazon France)
Storage: Seagate - BarraCuda 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive (€45.90 @ Amazon France)
Video Card: Gigabyte - GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB AORUS Xtreme Edition 11G Video Card (€759.99 @ Amazon France)
Case: Cooler Master - N200 MicroATX Mini Tower Case (€44.93 @ Amazon France)
Power Supply: SeaSonic - G 550W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply (€89.90 @ Amazon France)
Total: €1564.63
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-06-29 23:42 CEST+0200

1600X because a 7700K isn't much faster in games and compared with i5s the difference is negligible at the same price. 50% more cores and 50%/200% more threads though, which is nice. The main point though is AMD will keep the socket the same until at least 2020 so it'll be possible to upgrade without replacing the mobo. Intel will move to a different socket next year.
The rest is more or less standard, don't care much about the case.

Like I said I'll have to redo this because as you can see pcpartpicker France knows a lot of French retailers. Your options are Amazon France, which is expensive, and for a select few items there's the option of LDLC, which is even more expensive.

#2370
Only if you can accurately predict the ethereum price. Anyone who can (spoiler: no one really can do anything but make educated guesses) won't tell you because by not telling anyone they can make a lot of money.

For TF2 without streaming there's basically no difference between an i5 and an i3 though.
Unless you absolutely need the SSD to be the first on the server everyone else can save themselves those 60 quid if they're not planning on streaming.

Would really like some actual confirmation on the specs though.

The AOC G2460PF does not support 120/144 via HDMI according to its manual.
No idea about the Nixeus.
The ViewSonic XG2401 uses HDMI 1.4, which supports only 120, not 144 Hz and doesn't come with an HDMI cable for the same reason. Out of the 3 I'd say it's still the most likely to work (for 120 Hz) as it doesn't require HDMI 2.0.

NVidia Optimus means exactly what I suspected. The dGPU is routed through the iGPU. In theory both 120/144 Hz and HDMI 2.0 (since Kaby Lake) are supported by Intel, but in theory the Intel graphics drivers support a lot of things that don't end up working.

I wish you the best of luck, but frankly I've never seen the point of such setups. You're always going to have rather significant latency due to the iGPU/dGPU routing and have neither the CPU (for TF2) nor the GPU (for other games) to make a 120/144 Hz monitor a worthwhile investment.

Power-line ethernet?

#9
Could also be new version of Chrome + new nVidia drivers + HTML5 video + hardware acceleration. Disable hardware acceleration or try a different browser or try watching a non-HTML5 video.

#11
No, just windows. DWM forces the same refresh rate on all monitors when hw acceleration is enabled (except when using exclusive fullscreen).

I mean the solution is right there:

Even if it's not practical as a permanent solution it would rule out either wifi or software problems. It also would've been a temporary fix for the match.

Which GPU(s)?
Are both monitors plugged into the same GPU? This looks like you're using the iGPUs HDMI.

Are you sure it's HMDI 2.0 though?
On most laptops the outputs of the dGPU are routed through the iGPU.
I mean you're lucky enough to have a Kaby Lake CPU that is guaranteed to support 2.0 (not all are) but the drivers are incredily wonky so it might not work.

Nonetheless there are some. Almost all of them are not of the "cheap 1080p 24" 144 Hz TN panel" variety.
27" 1080p: Acer Predator XZ271bmijpphzx (VA)
27" 1440p: Acer XF270HUAbmiidprzx (IPS), Acer XF270HUbmijdprz (IPS), ASUS MG278Q (TN), BenQ Zowie XL2735 (TN)
31.5" 1080p: Acer XZ321Qbmijpphzx (VA)
31.5" 1440p: AOC Agon AG322QCX (VA)
2560x1080 ultrawide monitors:
34": LG 34UC79G-B, LG 34UC89G-B (both IPS)
35": Acer XZ350CUbmijphz, AOC C3583FQ (both VA)

And some 240 Hz 24.5" 1080p TN panels:
AOC Agon AG251FZ, BenQ Zowie XL2540, ViewSonic XG2530

This is by no means an exhaustive list.
You can build a pc with a faster CPU than your laptop's and buy a cheap 24" 144 Hz TN panel monitor for the same price as most of these monitors though.

#5
That's bullshit, converting the signal only adds even more latency.

http://www.teamfortress.tv/42114/pc-acting-up-major-ping-issues
Will you at least wait more than half a day before the next copy and paste repost?

Even if you are

I mean at least put some effort into it.
That includes:
-Thinking about which subforum to post in before posting, not after.
-Not deflecting every suggestion with "I'm dumb, I don't know how". You know how to use google and you're too old to be spoon-fed.

Also who the fuck is -fragging everything in this thread? If this thread upsets you don't keep refreshing just to -frag. It'll only upset you more

i5-7640X now actually.

Why the 6700K and not the 7700K? The 6700K is two years old and the same price.

Why are you comparing a 340$ CPU and a 190$ CPU? What did you expect the result would be?

If you're using x264 to encode (like you should) then 100% of it runs on the CPU. The GPU is not involved at all.
If your pc is BSODing or throwing RAM errors it got other problems.

Can do a list on Thursday but that won't tell you what'll be released in August/September so you might want to read up on that.
Also how quad cores perform when streaming.

Not the first cores, just in general. Yes, most games use 2-4 cores, though some use more.

I have no idea how that is future proofing. Are you saying you want to buy something that's not much faster but almost the same price or something that's not much faster and much more expensive? Either way it doesn't make sense to me.

The problem is if you think your FX-8350 (4 "modules"/8 threads) does not handle streaming well then how do you think a quad core (4 cores/ 4 or 8 threads) will fare?

I'm not saying you're guaranteed to regret it if you're buying now, but it seems rather likely.

Posting for Point because he's busy with his now working pc.
The CPU got loose somehow.