Upvote Upvoted 18 Downvote Downvoted
1 2 3
Campus employee assaults white student
posted in The Dumpster
61
#61
1 Frags +
dollarlayer
It never ends. Apparently a paper touching her jacket chest area twice by someones hand gestures = sexual assault and warrants a punch in the face.

tbf there's like 3+ people touching her leading up to the punch, it wouldn't be an absurd thing to think someone touched or harassed u if yr pumped up on adrenaline or being restrained

she's p fucking stupid tho anyone who protests a political rally deserves to be castrated

[quote=dollarlayer]

It never ends. Apparently a paper touching her jacket chest area twice by someones hand gestures = sexual assault and warrants a punch in the face. [/quote]
tbf there's like 3+ people touching her leading up to the punch, it wouldn't be an absurd thing to think someone touched or harassed u if yr pumped up on adrenaline or being restrained

she's p fucking stupid tho anyone who protests a political rally deserves to be castrated
62
#62
-2 Frags +
skeejOk, so as the thread kinda derailed already: Can we stop using the term "social justice movement" or whatever, and just call idiots idiots? Let's not devalue something that should actually be important to everybody (the fair and just relation between the individual and society) by structural application of negative connotations. Same with feminism etc.

Also, can we stop confusing individuals with arbitrarily defined imaginary groups of people? It's not necessary to extrapolate every individual occurence to broad generalities.

the problem is that the people who say "social justice/feminism still has good intentions, it's just a couple bad apples" are the same people who denounce labels like mra because of the bad apples.

over time words can change meaning. it's unfortunate, but sadly these are the people who, even if in the minority, are the loudest and arguably the most powerful. they're also pretty disingenuous because anyone who opposes them are labeled to be against justice/against women. "what? you're against feminism? why do you hate women?!?" for example.

i'd also like to note that feminism != equality and that it is imo beyond repair.

[quote=skeej]Ok, so as the thread kinda derailed already: Can we stop using the term "social justice movement" or whatever, and just call idiots idiots? Let's not devalue something that should actually be important to everybody (the fair and just relation between the individual and society) by structural application of negative connotations. Same with feminism etc.

Also, can we stop confusing individuals with arbitrarily defined imaginary groups of people? It's not necessary to extrapolate every individual occurence to broad generalities.[/quote]the problem is that the people who say "social justice/feminism still has good intentions, it's just a couple bad apples" are the same people who denounce labels like mra because of the bad apples.

over time words can change meaning. it's unfortunate, but sadly these are the people who, even if in the minority, are the loudest and arguably the most powerful. they're also pretty disingenuous because anyone who opposes them are labeled to be against justice/against women. "what? you're against feminism? why do you hate women?!?" for example.

i'd also like to note that feminism != equality and that it is imo beyond repair.
63
#63
3 Frags +
-fish-semi-related - recently a 19 year old blm supporter at a trump rally argues with a guy, tries to falsely accuse him of touching her breasts and punches him, then the girl gets pepper sprayed by a third party. the media is trying to spin her as the victim by lying about her age (they say she's 15 when police confirm she's actually 19) and saying she was sexually assaulted.

video
archive of a huff post article about it

welcome to the social justice movement, the ride never ends

https://i.gyazo.com/b0570b424f5febffe652af8e92f14397.png

[quote=-fish-]semi-related - recently a 19 year old blm supporter at a trump rally argues with a guy, tries to falsely accuse him of touching her breasts and punches him, then the girl gets pepper sprayed by a third party. the media is trying to spin her as the victim by lying about her age (they say she's 15 when police confirm she's actually 19) and saying she was sexually assaulted.

[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qg_cuODF5rU]video[/url]
[url=http://archive.is/vUzZF]archive of a huff post article about it[/url]

welcome to the social justice movement, the ride never ends[/quote]
[img]https://i.gyazo.com/b0570b424f5febffe652af8e92f14397.png[/img]
64
#64
4 Frags +
eeethat's like saying that if you know what the word nigger means you're automatically racist. Obv a racist would know what it means, but he'd be a p small part of the overall venn diagram

He said it because you baselessly equated "animal" with "ape", giving a general insult a racial connotation where there was none. By your metaphor, you called somebody out for calling his friend Nick, thinking he was trying to call him a nigger.

[quote=eee]
that's like saying that if you know what the word nigger means you're automatically racist. Obv a racist would know what it means, but he'd be a p small part of the overall venn diagram[/quote]

He said it because you baselessly equated "animal" with "ape", giving a general insult a racial connotation where there was none. By your metaphor, you called somebody out for calling his friend Nick, thinking he was trying to call him a nigger.
65
#65
-3 Frags +
-fish-stuff

everything youre saying makes you sound like a cornball

i agree what w shes saying in the video, but shes being really combative and rude to some random dude which isnt cool

[quote=-fish-]stuff[/quote]
everything youre saying makes you sound like a cornball

i agree what w shes saying in the video, but shes being really combative and rude to some random dude which isnt cool
66
#66
-4 Frags +
the301stspartaneeethat's like saying that if you know what the word nigger means you're automatically racist. Obv a racist would know what it means, but he'd be a p small part of the overall venn diagram
He said it because you baselessly equated "animal" with "ape", giving a general insult a racial connotation where there was none. By your metaphor, you called somebody out for calling his friend Nick, thinking he was trying to call him a nigger.

i mean context is a bit important but around here calling black ppl monkeys or apes or w/e isn't uncommon

[quote=the301stspartan][quote=eee]
that's like saying that if you know what the word nigger means you're automatically racist. Obv a racist would know what it means, but he'd be a p small part of the overall venn diagram[/quote]

He said it because you baselessly equated "animal" with "ape", giving a general insult a racial connotation where there was none. By your metaphor, you called somebody out for calling his friend Nick, thinking he was trying to call him a nigger.[/quote]
i mean context is a bit important but around here calling black ppl monkeys or apes or w/e isn't uncommon
67
#67
-5 Frags +

What's the point of talking about this on the Internet. It's not like the other person is listening to you anyway.

What's the point of talking about this on the Internet. It's not like the other person is listening to you anyway.
68
#68
1 Frags +
the301stspartaneeethat's like saying that if you know what the word nigger means you're automatically racist. Obv a racist would know what it means, but he'd be a p small part of the overall venn diagram
He said it because you baselessly equated "animal" with "ape", giving a general insult a racial connotation where there was none. By your metaphor, you called somebody out for calling his friend Nick, thinking he was trying to call him a nigger.

this is completely ridiculous though because racist rhetoric has a history of associating african americans with apes and other animals, you cant just completely ignore the cultural context of the specific insult that someone decides to use.

[quote=the301stspartan][quote=eee]
that's like saying that if you know what the word nigger means you're automatically racist. Obv a racist would know what it means, but he'd be a p small part of the overall venn diagram[/quote]

He said it because you baselessly equated "animal" with "ape", giving a general insult a racial connotation where there was none. By your metaphor, you called somebody out for calling his friend Nick, thinking he was trying to call him a nigger.[/quote]

this is completely ridiculous though because racist rhetoric has a history of associating african americans with apes and other animals, you cant just completely ignore the cultural context of the specific insult that someone decides to use.
69
#69
5 Frags +
nitethe301stspartaneeethat's like saying that if you know what the word nigger means you're automatically racist. Obv a racist would know what it means, but he'd be a p small part of the overall venn diagram
He said it because you baselessly equated "animal" with "ape", giving a general insult a racial connotation where there was none. By your metaphor, you called somebody out for calling his friend Nick, thinking he was trying to call him a nigger.

this is completely ridiculous though because racist rhetoric has a history of associating african americans with apes and monkeys, you cant just completely ignore the cultural context of the specific insult that someone decides to use.

But the ape insult was never used nor hinted at so your point makes no sense at all. "Animal" could refer to the woman behaving like a rabid dog, the notion that someone who yells "where is Egypt??" at anyone wearing dreads is about as smart as a cow, or a hundred other non-racist ideas.
The syllogism "All racists call black people apes", "Apes are animals"-->"Calling a black person an animal makes you a racist" fails a basic aristothelean logic check.
If someone calls a shredded black bodybuilder an animal, you wouldn't assume they're calling him an ape, would you?

Show Content
what's the problem anyway, all people are apes
[quote=nite][quote=the301stspartan][quote=eee]
that's like saying that if you know what the word nigger means you're automatically racist. Obv a racist would know what it means, but he'd be a p small part of the overall venn diagram[/quote]

He said it because you baselessly equated "animal" with "ape", giving a general insult a racial connotation where there was none. By your metaphor, you called somebody out for calling his friend Nick, thinking he was trying to call him a nigger.[/quote]

this is completely ridiculous though because racist rhetoric has a history of associating african americans with apes and monkeys, you cant just completely ignore the cultural context of the specific insult that someone decides to use.[/quote]

But the ape insult was never used nor hinted at so your point makes no sense at all. "Animal" could refer to the woman behaving like a rabid dog, the notion that someone who yells "where is Egypt??" at anyone wearing dreads is about as smart as a cow, or a hundred other non-racist ideas.
The syllogism "All racists call black people apes", "Apes are animals"-->"Calling a black person an animal makes you a racist" fails a basic aristothelean logic check.
If someone calls a shredded black bodybuilder an animal, you wouldn't assume they're calling him an ape, would you?

[spoiler]what's the problem anyway, all people are apes[/spoiler]
70
#70
1 Frags +
eeethe301stspartaneeethat's like saying that if you know what the word nigger means you're automatically racist. Obv a racist would know what it means, but he'd be a p small part of the overall venn diagram
He said it because you baselessly equated "animal" with "ape", giving a general insult a racial connotation where there was none. By your metaphor, you called somebody out for calling his friend Nick, thinking he was trying to call him a nigger.
i mean context is a bit important but around here calling black ppl monkeys or apes or w/e isn't uncommon

i'm just going to blame your ignorant attitude on the extremely edgy tumblr linked on your profile

your argument is incredibly stupid, having knowledge about a stereotype and/or racism doesn't mean you're going to perpetuate it, that's like saying that if you know how to kill someone you're a murderer by association to the idea

[quote=eee][quote=the301stspartan][quote=eee]
that's like saying that if you know what the word nigger means you're automatically racist. Obv a racist would know what it means, but he'd be a p small part of the overall venn diagram[/quote]

He said it because you baselessly equated "animal" with "ape", giving a general insult a racial connotation where there was none. By your metaphor, you called somebody out for calling his friend Nick, thinking he was trying to call him a nigger.[/quote]
i mean context is a bit important but around here calling black ppl monkeys or apes or w/e isn't uncommon[/quote]

i'm just going to blame your ignorant attitude on the extremely edgy tumblr linked on your profile

your argument is incredibly stupid, having knowledge about a stereotype and/or racism doesn't mean you're going to perpetuate it, that's like saying that if you know how to kill someone you're a murderer by association to the idea
71
#71
-4 Frags +
the301stspartanBut the ape insult was never used nor hinted at so your point makes no sense at all.

ive heard the ape thing p underhanded and p blunt here so its kind of a common insult, sorry for assuming that someone who was describing a black person as loud and rude could maybe be using an insult that 99% of people i've heard describe black people as loud and rude use

"If someone calls a shredded black bodybuilder an animal, you wouldn't assume they're calling him an ape, would you?"
if he was being a complete fuckin asshole and goin off on somebody calling him an ape would probably not blow over well

because

sUrPrIsE

english is fairly contextual

Show Content
it's 100% possible he didn't mean it that way, but i genuinely doubt it considering how most of the people in these threads present themselves
wac
i'm just going to blame your ignorant attitude on the extremely edgy tumblr linked on your profile

your argument is incredibly stupid, having knowledge about a stereotype and/or racism doesn't mean you're going to perpetuate it, that's like saying that if you know how to kill someone you're a murderer by association to the idea

you literally

just quoted my argument back at me

retard

[quote=the301stspartan]
But the ape insult was never used nor hinted at so your point makes no sense at all.

[/quote]
ive heard the ape thing p underhanded and p blunt here so its kind of a common insult, sorry for assuming that someone who was describing a black person as loud and rude could maybe be using an insult that 99% of people i've heard describe black people as loud and rude use

"If someone calls a shredded black bodybuilder an animal, you wouldn't assume they're calling him an ape, would you?"
if he was being a complete fuckin asshole and goin off on somebody calling him an ape would probably not blow over well

because

sUrPrIsE

english is fairly contextual

[spoiler]it's 100% possible he didn't mean it that way, but i genuinely doubt it considering how most of the people in these threads present themselves[/spoiler]
[quote=wac]

i'm just going to blame your ignorant attitude on the extremely edgy tumblr linked on your profile

your argument is incredibly stupid, having knowledge about a stereotype and/or racism doesn't mean you're going to perpetuate it, that's like saying that if you know how to kill someone you're a murderer by association to the idea[/quote]
you literally

just quoted my argument back at me

retard
72
#72
1 Frags +

You're making assumptions without any backup and getting mad at people for saying innocuous things for absolutely no reason. You are the woman.

You're making assumptions without any backup and getting mad at people for saying innocuous things for absolutely no reason. You are the woman.
73
#73
-1 Frags +

its fine if you dont see the racial connotation in it i guess but if you're going to argue against social justice and hugbox mentality or w/e you should try to not format your speech in a way that it'd be pretty easy to interpret you as the exact kind of person who necessitated equality movements in the first place

on top of that, it'd just be nice to be able to discuss anything without people shittalking or insulting either side in really creative ways. "yre subhuman intellectually" isn't funny or interesting like yr an adult take a comedy class or euthanize yrself actually fuck niggers and fuck social justice 14/88 trump 2016 MAGA

its fine if you dont see the racial connotation in it i guess but if you're going to argue against social justice and hugbox mentality or w/e you should try to not format your speech in a way that it'd be pretty easy to interpret you as the [i]exact[/i] kind of person who necessitated equality movements in the first place

on top of that, it'd just be nice to be able to discuss anything without people shittalking or insulting either side in really creative ways. "yre subhuman intellectually" isn't funny or interesting like yr an adult take a comedy class or euthanize yrself actually fuck niggers and fuck social justice 14/88 trump 2016 MAGA
74
#74
7 Frags +

everyone in that video looks like they're cosplaying as Hey Arnold characters

everyone in that video looks like they're cosplaying as Hey Arnold characters
75
#75
2 Frags +

oh boy the good old "you shouldnt let me interpret your words the wrong way" argument

oh boy the good old "you shouldnt let me interpret your words the wrong way" argument
76
#76
3 Frags +
flufnWhat's the point of talking about this on the Internet. It's not like the other person is listening to you anyway.

They kick me out of the hardware store.

[quote=flufn]What's the point of talking about this on the Internet. It's not like the other person is listening to you anyway.[/quote]

They kick me out of the hardware store.
77
#77
3 Frags +

This is worse then reading reddit

This is worse then reading reddit
78
#78
0 Frags +
-fish-skeejOk, so as the thread kinda derailed already: Can we stop using the term "social justice movement" or whatever, and just call idiots idiots? Let's not devalue something that should actually be important to everybody (the fair and just relation between the individual and society) by structural application of negative connotations. Same with feminism etc.

Also, can we stop confusing individuals with arbitrarily defined imaginary groups of people? It's not necessary to extrapolate every individual occurence to broad generalities.

the problem is that the people who say "social justice/feminism still has good intentions, it's just a couple bad apples" are the same people who denounce labels like mra because of the bad apples.

Who does this? Not me at least. Who are "the people"? What you are doing is exactly what I criticized. You make up some imaginary arbitrarily defined group of people to which probably no individual would ascribe themselves to. I'm not using the "bad apples" argument, because that would imply a set and defined group of which said bad apples are a part of.

Social justice and feminism in the broadest sense aren't groups or movements. Both are phrases that describe ways of thinking. Both carry heavy historical weight. Feminism could arguably be seen as a movement (depending on where (time & place) you look). People might identify themselves as feminist, but that still doesn't tell you much about what they think. Social justice is more like an overarching concept that encompasses many ideas. I don't see persons explicitly identifying themselves as social justice 'people'.

over time words can change meaning. it's unfortunate, but sadly these are the people who, even if in the minority, are the loudest and arguably the most powerful.

"The minority" of what group? Again, you are implying a group of which none of the individuals you would ascribe to this group would agree they'd be part of.

they're also pretty disingenuous because anyone who opposes them are labeled to be against justice/against women. "what? you're against feminism? why do you hate women?!?" for example.

Again, the "they".

By the way, this is not part of my main argument, but: Humor me, and find me an example of somebody who said exactly what you said in quotation marks. You'd still be at n=1, not enough to make a "they" statement, but it'd be a start.

i'd also like to note that feminism != equality and that it is imo beyond repair.

This quote (and what you said above) displays a typical internet-schooled type way of thinking about certain issues. On the internet, it's very easy to end up in spaces that act like bubbles, where likeminded people fuel a feedback loop of confirmation of opinions. Anything that is irrelevant or opposes a certain consensus world view is thrown out, because there simply is no person present that can oppose, or provide perspective and nuance. It's basically groupthink confirmation bias. This causes ideas to snowball into becoming more radical and polarizing.

I'm not saying that your views on feminism are wrong. I'm saying that this typical polarized black and white view is a caricature of reality, and also doesn't help anybody, on any side of the spectrum, going forward. Even worse, excessive "us/them" thinking (in general) becomes very dangerous when taken to its logical conclusion.

[quote=-fish-][quote=skeej]Ok, so as the thread kinda derailed already: Can we stop using the term "social justice movement" or whatever, and just call idiots idiots? Let's not devalue something that should actually be important to everybody (the fair and just relation between the individual and society) by structural application of negative connotations. Same with feminism etc.

Also, can we stop confusing individuals with arbitrarily defined imaginary groups of people? It's not necessary to extrapolate every individual occurence to broad generalities.[/quote]

the problem is that the people who say "social justice/feminism still has good intentions, it's just a couple bad apples" are the same people who denounce labels like mra because of the bad apples.[/quote]

Who does this? Not me at least. Who are "the people"? What you are doing is exactly what I criticized. You make up some imaginary arbitrarily defined group of people to which probably no individual would ascribe themselves to. I'm not using the "bad apples" argument, because that would imply a set and defined group of which said bad apples are a part of.

Social justice and feminism in the broadest sense aren't groups or movements. Both are phrases that describe ways of thinking. Both carry heavy historical weight. Feminism could arguably be seen as a movement (depending on where (time & place) you look). People might identify themselves as feminist, but that still doesn't tell you much about what they think. Social justice is more like an overarching concept that encompasses many ideas. I don't see persons explicitly identifying themselves as social justice 'people'.

[quote]over time words can change meaning. it's unfortunate, but sadly these are the people who, even if in the minority, are the loudest and arguably the most powerful. [/quote]

"The minority" of what group? Again, you are implying a group of which none of the individuals you would ascribe to this group would agree they'd be part of.

[quote]they're also pretty disingenuous because anyone who opposes them are labeled to be against justice/against women. "what? you're against feminism? why do you hate women?!?" for example.[/quote]

Again, the "they".

By the way, this is not part of my main argument, but: Humor me, and find me an example of somebody who said exactly what you said in quotation marks. You'd still be at n=1, not enough to make a "they" statement, but it'd be a start.

[quote]i'd also like to note that feminism != equality and that it is imo beyond repair.[/quote]

This quote (and what you said above) displays a typical internet-schooled type way of thinking about certain issues. On the internet, it's very easy to end up in spaces that act like bubbles, where likeminded people fuel a feedback loop of confirmation of opinions. Anything that is irrelevant or opposes a certain consensus world view is thrown out, because there simply is no person present that can oppose, or provide perspective and nuance. It's basically groupthink confirmation bias. This causes ideas to snowball into becoming more radical and polarizing.

I'm not saying that your views on feminism are wrong. I'm saying that this typical polarized black and white view is a caricature of reality, and also doesn't help anybody, on any side of the spectrum, going forward. Even worse, excessive "us/them" thinking (in general) becomes very dangerous when taken to its logical conclusion.
1 2 3
Please sign in through STEAM to post a comment.