Upvote Upvoted 14 Downvote Downvoted
ESEA Invite S17 Power Rankings: Week 3
posted in News
Tery_
August 3, 2014

Recap

The dynasty has fallen. If there's anything you should've picked up from last week, it's that Froyotech is no longer undefeated. Exertus snapped b4nny's regular season streak of 66 wins on Wednesday night with a 5-2 game. There was also a plethora of coverage from TFTV, cbear, and Ggglygy, streaming matches all across the Invite division (and some CEVO-P, too). With such a competitive season of Invite, it's awesome to see so much coverage so shoutouts and thank you to all the casters, camermen, and organizers. Keep up the good work, everyone.

-

1. Froyotech (3-1)

Undefeated in the regular season no more. Froyotech suffered their first (regular season) loss in the last 4 seasons against Exertus, before cleaning up Mixup shortly afterward. The decision to keep XTS below Froyotech was something I struggled with the entire week. Clckwrk underperforming at 19-30 isn't something you see every day. Whether this was clckwrk playing sloppy or being contained extremely well by XTS remains to be seen, as he did play to form in the CEVO-P rematch. I will reserve judgment until their second meetup later in the season on Viaduct. Froyotech have only to play Wood Pig on Gullywash, where I suspect each member will be too much for their counterpart to handle. I'll try and predict some more in these Power Rankings, so I'll call a 5-1 win for Froyotech.

2. Exertus TF2 (4-0)

If there's a team to remain undefeated in this season, it's Exertus. They've topped Mixup, and they've toppled Froyotech. With the way this team has been playing, seems that only the two aforementioned teams should present a threat now. Fragile had to ring in place of cozen who was on vacation, and his survivability really earned a lot of advantage for XTS, supported by the powerful play of Bdonski and Decimate. Gullywash week brings Br0nzing with Br0nze and Mad Men to their doorstep, and I expect XTS to walk away from both games without much worry. Bdonski should be ridiculous on midfights and alfa will surely try to get a power play going over on Sniper. Mad Men should be able to take a few rounds but not before XTS gets the win. 5-2 Exertus.

3. Classic Mixup (1-2)

During the 5-0 loss Mixup received from Froyotech, I remember a quote from cbear or yuki on how “Mixup tends to coast through the season and then turn things up at LAN” (paraphrase). This quote rings familiar to me for what people said about Tyrone back in the day, before his retirement. Combined with Platinum's statement that apparently most of Mixup is going to retire after this season of TF2 (ESEA, CEVO, i52), you really gotta wonder how much effort Mixup will put in for their “last stand.” That being said though, Mixup still showed they're not going to let the bubble teams walk over them, as they 5-1'd Wood Pig in 13 minutes (for a cute statistic, 3 people outscored harbleu in that match). Mixup plays Mad Men and The Hurricane this week, and I'd assume the result of the Mad Men game to not be all that different from whatever the XTS vs. Mad Men game is.

4. Wood Pig (1-2)

Wood Pig didn't have quite the week as I thought, since they played Classic Mixup for their only Granary match, and that was as quite the short game. There's nothing to talk about. I could say that meb took exactly 43 heals that match, and was probably the player who made harbleu drop uber but really looking at numbers from that match is so irrelevant it's best to stop here and look forward. Wood Pig's Gullywash opponents will be Froyotech and The Hurricane. Based on Street Hoops' performances against The Hurricane, I'd hope about the same out of Wood Pig, but The Hurricane really proved me wrong on Process week, perhaps they'll surprise again. 5-3 for Wood Pig.

5. Street Hoops Esports (2-2)

What a season it's already been for 20b. Starting off the season with a narrow 5-4 loss in overtime to another narrow 5-4 in overtime this past week, but this time on the winning end. The hype is clearly from that Mad Men game, where grape and cyzer played out of their minds, but not to be overshadowed was deadbolt's consistency in getting those crucial Medic picks with Kritzkrieg. Both of 20b's opponents this week have had rough starts (Br0nzing wit Br0nze and Ding Dong Daddy). Should they keep riding off grape's superb play, I see no reason for Street Hoops to be 4-2 at the end of this week. 5-2 win for Street Hoops against Ding Dong Daddy, and a 5-0 against Br0nzing with Br0nze.

6. Mad Men (2-1)

I honestly have no idea how Mad Men didn't walk away from the match against Street Hoops with a 5-2 win. The backcap play was perfect. Mike and Memphis on 2P while the combo stalled midpoint with their uber. Whether they were just unlucky or somehow couldn't capture last in time is up in the air but they surely lost momentum from that point which led to their defeat in overtime. Still, everyone played exceptionally well and if not for that failed backcap and untimely deaths to Kritzkrieg from indust, Mad Men should've come out on top. Mad Men continue with the LAN team tour this week with Classic Mixup and Exertus, and despite the near win against 20b, I don't think they will be able to pull off the same in front of these giants, but hey, Blame Game certainly proved me wrong last week. Maybe its Mad Men's turn to get the upset wheel rolling.

7. The Hurricane (2-2)

This is what I get for putting Blame Game in last, apparently. The newly branded “THE HURRICANE” punched Ding Dong Daddy and Br0nzing with Br0nze in the mouth on Process. My boy icTus showing me to not underestimate him as he played like a monster in both games, alongside insom's onslaught of damage. They had respectable showings against Street Hoops and Exertus on Granary. In particular, ChinGoo went 20-15 with over 300DPM in their 2-5 loss against XTS. Since they put up strong showings against the LAN teams, I'd guess around the same results for their matches against Wood Pig and Mixup.

8. Ding Dong Daddy (1-3)

Ding Dong Daddy is off to a rocky start with a forfeit win against Br0nzing with Br0nze, and 0-5, 1-5, and 3-5 losses to Froyotech, Blame Game, and Mad Men respectively. Unfortunately there isn't much to write about. I think that they would've been able to beat Br0nzing with Br0nze either way, and the other results are about what I expected. This upcoming match against Street Hoops should reveal a lot about these newcomers. Given their match results against Mad Men, I believe it's entirely possible for Ding Dong Daddy to win against Street Hoops. Showstopper vs. Grape, and alec vs. cyzer will be the key matchups in that game.

9. Br0nzing with Br0nze (0-3)

Br0nze and friends take home the “Most Boring Granary Week” award going into Gullywash. Their single matchup turned into a forfeit loss due to roster struggles. The departures of both blink and Broking leave the team with just 5 paid players on the roster: Br0nze, Pharaoh, Shrugger, smaka, and snailboat. Researching SizzlingStats show Ibby and thrill playing in their most recent scrims so perhaps those are possibilities. Smaka was kind enough to divulge that the roster's status is still up the air so hopefully they live. It'd be tragic to see a team death this early on.

Match of the Week

Classic Mixup (1-2) vs. Mad Men (2-1)

Good news: I predicted the best match of last week. Bad news: Only from my honorable mentions list. Anyway onto this week. Honestly this pool of matches seems more difficult than the last, with a lot seemingly volatile. They could be close games or they could be worlds apart. Classic Mixup vs. Mad Men will have serious implications, however, so we'll go with them. Mad Men is looking to claw their way past the bubble teams and have been doing so, trumping Ding Dong Daddy and Br0nzing with Br0nze and just nipplehairs away from winning against Street Hoops. On the flipside, Mixup has been reeling from their losses to XTS and Froyotech. Mad Men could use this opportunity to kick Mixup while they're down, or Mixup can be assertive and say, “We're not going to let you walk over us.”

All the talk from Mixup has been coming from their flank. Enigma, squid, and Seagull are all dangerous and just letting one out of control can spell trouble for your team. However, YouMustMike, MemphisVon, and bl4nk will be doing their best to not let that happen. I do think bl4nk will be the weakest Scout of the group but Mike has been really strong. If both flanks lock each other down then this battle will come down to combo play. Naturally, I have to side with TLR and Platinum here, but this gives marmaduke and Chriztafah the chance to step up and show they can hang with the top. Harbleu and indust likewise should be an even matchup, and any drops from either Medic could be huge momentum swings in the other team's favor. But like I said above, these matches all seem so unpredictable that I wouldn't be all too surprised if Mixup just destroys Mad Men (not that exciting) or if Mad Men come out on top.

One thing is for sure, Classic Mixup really needs this victory or they'll be the most vulnerable they have ever been in a long, long time, and boy would Mad Men want to be the team grabbing a win here.

Prediction: Classic Mixup – 5, Mad Men – 2

Players to Watch: TLR, harbleu, YouMustMike, marmadukeGRYLLS

Final Glance

  1. Froyotech
  2. Exertus TF2 [+1]
  3. Classic Mixup [-1]
  4. Wood Pig
  5. Street Hoops Esports
  6. Mad Men
  7. The Hurricane [+2]
  8. Ding Dong Daddy [-1]
  9. Br0nzing With Br0nze [-1]
1
#1
8 Frags +

XTS topped XTS?

XTS topped XTS?
2
#2
-20 Frags +
Whether this was clckwrk playing sloppy or being contained extremely well by XTS remains to be seen, as he did play to form in the CEVO-P rematch.

if you're writing ESEA power rankings why bring cevo matches into it?

[quote]Whether this was clckwrk playing sloppy or being contained extremely well by XTS remains to be seen, as he did play to form in the CEVO-P rematch.[/quote]

if you're writing ESEA power rankings why bring cevo matches into it?
3
#3
34 Frags +

because they give insight for how well the teams might play in the future. it's not like he's just copy pasting the esea rankings

because they give insight for how well the teams might play in the future. it's not like he's just copy pasting the esea rankings
4
#4
-23 Frags +

thats poor insight, so an undefeated team is placed below a team they beat but matches outside of ESEA somehow determine their 2nd spot, sorry but this writing leaves very little to be desired and no im not just saying that because XTS is 2nd, i'd say the same thing if they were 1st

thats poor insight, so an undefeated team is placed below a team they beat but matches outside of ESEA somehow determine their 2nd spot, sorry but this writing leaves very little to be desired and no im not just saying that because XTS is 2nd, i'd say the same thing if they were 1st
5
#5
15 Frags +

i don't care about the writing i'm just talking about the use of cevo matches for reasoning. if u want to see XTS as #1 go look at esea standings. these power rankings are fairly accurate and there's nothing wrong with looking at other matches to justify why you think a team is better.

i don't care about the writing i'm just talking about the use of cevo matches for reasoning. if u want to see XTS as #1 go look at esea standings. these power rankings are fairly accurate and there's nothing wrong with looking at other matches to justify why you think a team is better.
6
#6
-22 Frags +

i see where you're coming from, i just personally think within the context of this write up in particular its better to use only ESEA matches to determine placement. if its used once for talking about xts and froyo thats fine but if this sort of thing was on a regular basis for reasoning then thats just a horrible way of approaching power rankings. if next week he says something like "well they beat them in this esea match, but got steamrolled in the cevo one im just gonna leave them in this spot" thats just bad.

i see where you're coming from, i just personally think within the context of this write up in particular its better to use only ESEA matches to determine placement. if its used once for talking about xts and froyo thats fine but if this sort of thing was on a regular basis for reasoning then thats just a horrible way of approaching power rankings. if next week he says something like "well they beat them in this esea match, but got steamrolled in the cevo one im just gonna leave them in this spot" thats just bad.
7
#7
14 Frags +

Defy you would be right if the guy was getting paid by ESEA to write these. But this is a TF.TV based power ranking so all games are fair 'game', in terms of who is in form and playing well.

Also big ups to Terry for going with his gut and giving Froyo the top spot despite the numbers. His argument is sound, and this is why we read these power rankings anyways for the editorial wisdom that expresses what is actually going on.

Defy you would be right if the guy was getting paid by ESEA to write these. But this is a TF.TV based power ranking so all games are fair 'game', in terms of who is in form and playing well.

Also big ups to Terry for going with his gut and giving Froyo the top spot despite the numbers. His argument is sound, and this is why we read these power rankings anyways for the editorial wisdom that expresses what is actually going on.
8
#8
13 Frags +

WAVE CHAPPELLE: ROFLLLLLLLLLL
WAVE CHAPPELLE: u actually tried playing with 6 cuties??????????? HAHAHAHAA
WAVE CHAPPELLE: gimme ur pov so i can make a comedy film out of it
Ibby: whotold you

WAVE CHAPPELLE: ROFLLLLLLLLLL
WAVE CHAPPELLE: u actually tried playing with 6 cuties??????????? HAHAHAHAA
WAVE CHAPPELLE: gimme ur pov so i can make a comedy film out of it
Ibby: whotold you
9
#9
13 Frags +

word on the street is that 6cuties is dead

word on the street is that 6cuties is dead
10
#10
15 Frags +

s13: Auburn, Br0nze, PUFF, ricky, Sakura, useoftoaster

s14: Br0nze, Pharaoh, remedy, ricky, Sakura, snailboat

s15: Br0nze, Pharaoh, ricky, Sakura, snailboat, Tone-Pot

s16: Br0nze, Paddie, Pharaoh, Remedy, Shrugger, Snailboat

s17:dead

:(

s13: Auburn, Br0nze, PUFF, ricky, Sakura, useoftoaster

s14: Br0nze, Pharaoh, remedy, ricky, Sakura, snailboat

s15: Br0nze, Pharaoh, ricky, Sakura, snailboat, Tone-Pot

s16: Br0nze, Paddie, Pharaoh, Remedy, Shrugger, Snailboat

s17:dead

:(
11
#11
1 Frags +

i was hoping that sezco would pay up :(

i was hoping that sezco would pay up :(
12
#12
10 Frags +

Yes, br0nzing is dead. The roster struggle has gotten to the point that it's not worth continuing. I'm not willing to ask Sezco (or anyone else) to pay $60 for a team that's got roughly a zero percent chance of finishing in the top 4 this late in the season. Even if he paid up, he'd be on a new class and we'd still have no medic.

Yes, br0nzing is dead. The roster struggle has gotten to the point that it's not worth continuing. I'm not willing to ask Sezco (or anyone else) to pay $60 for a team that's got roughly a zero percent chance of finishing in the top 4 this late in the season. Even if he paid up, he'd be on a new class and we'd still have no medic.
13
#13
20 Frags +
defythats poor insight, so an undefeated team is placed below a team they beat but matches outside of ESEA somehow determine their 2nd spot, sorry but this writing leaves very little to be desired and no im not just saying that because XTS is 2nd, i'd say the same thing if they were 1stdefyWhether this was clckwrk playing sloppy or being contained extremely well by XTS remains to be seen, as he did play to form in the CEVO-P rematch.
if you're writing ESEA power rankings why bring cevo matches into it?

As per usual, your logic is as bad as your grammar. If something "leaves very little to be desired," you are stating that you are happy with it. If you are unhappy with it, the phrase is, "leaves much to be desired".

If you used ONLY ESEA matches to determine these power rankings, they'd be identical to the ESEA standings, and would therefore be moot.

[quote=defy]thats poor insight, so an undefeated team is placed below a team they beat but matches outside of ESEA somehow determine their 2nd spot, sorry but this writing leaves very little to be desired and no im not just saying that because XTS is 2nd, i'd say the same thing if they were 1st[/quote]
[quote=defy][quote]Whether this was clckwrk playing sloppy or being contained extremely well by XTS remains to be seen, as he did play to form in the CEVO-P rematch.[/quote]

if you're writing ESEA power rankings why bring cevo matches into it?[/quote]

As per usual, your logic is as bad as your grammar. If something "leaves very little to be desired," you are stating that you are happy with it. If you are unhappy with it, the phrase is, "leaves much to be desired".

If you used ONLY ESEA matches to determine these power rankings, they'd be identical to the ESEA standings, and would therefore be moot.
14
#14
-7 Frags +
smakersdefythats poor insight, so an undefeated team is placed below a team they beat but matches outside of ESEA somehow determine their 2nd spot, sorry but this writing leaves very little to be desired and no im not just saying that because XTS is 2nd, i'd say the same thing if they were 1stdefyWhether this was clckwrk playing sloppy or being contained extremely well by XTS remains to be seen, as he did play to form in the CEVO-P rematch.
if you're writing ESEA power rankings why bring cevo matches into it?

As per usual, your logic is as bad as your grammar. If something "leaves very little to be desired," you are stating that you are happy with it. If you are unhappy with it, the phrase is, "leaves much to be desired".

If you used ONLY ESEA matches to determine these power rankings, they'd be identical to the ESEA standings, and would therefore be moot.

oh ok i fucked that one up, i never said they had to be identical to the standings, i just think its typical biased writing the same way rk used to do his rankings. bring back bloodsire

[quote=smakers][quote=defy]thats poor insight, so an undefeated team is placed below a team they beat but matches outside of ESEA somehow determine their 2nd spot, sorry but this writing leaves very little to be desired and no im not just saying that because XTS is 2nd, i'd say the same thing if they were 1st[/quote]
[quote=defy][quote]Whether this was clckwrk playing sloppy or being contained extremely well by XTS remains to be seen, as he did play to form in the CEVO-P rematch.[/quote]

if you're writing ESEA power rankings why bring cevo matches into it?[/quote]

As per usual, your logic is as bad as your grammar. If something "leaves very little to be desired," you are stating that you are happy with it. If you are unhappy with it, the phrase is, "leaves much to be desired".

If you used ONLY ESEA matches to determine these power rankings, they'd be identical to the ESEA standings, and would therefore be moot.[/quote]

oh ok i fucked that one up, i never said they had to be identical to the standings, i just think its typical biased writing the same way rk used to do his rankings. bring back bloodsire
15
#15
19 Frags +

How is it biased? If a team has been the best for over a year and they lose one regular season game to a competitor, then turn around and beat that competitor under equal conditions (same map, same lineups) not one week later, even in a different league, it's fair to say that they're still the best, and the loss was more likely an aberration.

maybe this is the changing of the guard, but we don't have any real indicator that it is until XTS continues to prove it.

How is it biased? If a team has been the best for over a year and they lose one regular season game to a competitor, then turn around and beat that competitor under equal conditions (same map, same lineups) not one week later, even in a different league, it's fair to say that they're still the best, and the loss was more likely an aberration.

maybe this is the changing of the guard, but we don't have any real indicator that it is until XTS continues to prove it.
16
#16
-3 Frags +

Power rankings have always used SizzlingStats too, I don't think any rankings are based on ESEA matches only (if they were that would just be ESEA standings, as other people pointed out). CEVO matches are actually useful now. Now that GXL is happening and the CEVO finals are at LAN there's incentive to not dick around. Looking at CEVO matches two seasons ago (one division, seanbud dh pocket) or even maybe last season (justin targe demo) would have been a tad questionable in my opinion. Add into this the fact that I think both XTS and froyo took the match seriously and I don't see what the issue is.

edited to clarify what I mean, I guess it was confusing? don't write when you're tired.

Power rankings have always used SizzlingStats too, I don't think any rankings are based on ESEA matches only (if they were that would just be ESEA standings, as other people pointed out). CEVO matches are actually useful now. Now that GXL is happening and the CEVO finals are at LAN there's incentive to not dick around. Looking at CEVO matches two seasons ago (one division, seanbud dh pocket) or even maybe last season (justin targe demo) would have been a tad questionable in my opinion. Add into this the fact that I think both XTS and froyo took the match seriously and I don't see what the issue is.

edited to clarify what I mean, I guess it was confusing? don't write when you're tired.
17
#17
3 Frags +
hanbroloPower rankings have always used SizzlingStats too; would you prefer the writer's using scrims to rank teams?? Looking at CEVO matches two seasons ago or even maybe last season would have been a tad questionable in my opinion but now that GXL is happening and there's incentive to not dick around I see no problem with it. Especially because in this specific case I'd imagine Froyotech would want blood after that demoralizing defeat.

wat.

[quote=hanbrolo]Power rankings have always used SizzlingStats too; would you prefer the writer's using scrims to rank teams?? Looking at CEVO matches two seasons ago or even maybe last season would have been a tad questionable in my opinion but now that GXL is happening and there's incentive to not dick around I see no problem with it. Especially because in this specific case I'd imagine Froyotech would want blood after that demoralizing defeat.[/quote]

wat.
18
#18
Momentum Mod
-1 Frags +
Mixup still showed they’re not going to let the bubble teams walk over them, as they 5-1’d Wood Pig in 13 minutes (for a cute statistic, 3 people outscored harbleu in that match).

Lol someone didn't bother to either watch the cast or dl the stv even though the stats were so wonky you should've.

[quote]Mixup still showed they’re not going to let the bubble teams walk over them, as they 5-1’d Wood Pig in 13 minutes (for a cute statistic, 3 people outscored harbleu in that match).[/quote]

Lol someone didn't bother to either watch the cast or dl the stv even though the stats were so wonky you should've.
19
#19
0 Frags +

Let's just put a whole season's worth of evidence aside because XTS won one match. Not to mention they lost the night after on the same map. If anything XTS and Froyo would be tied for 1st.

Let's just put a whole season's worth of evidence aside because XTS won one match. Not to mention they lost the night after on the same map. If anything XTS and Froyo would be tied for 1st.
20
#20
RGB LAN
8 Frags +
potLet's just put a whole season's worth of evidence aside because XTS won one match. Not to mention they lost the night after on the same map. If anything XTS and Froyo would be tied for 1st.

Pretty sure we would still be ranked second even if we won our CEVO match. Not that it really matters, because it's just one week and there's a lot of TF2 to be played. I'm just glad content like this is being put out.

[quote=pot]Let's just put a whole season's worth of evidence aside because XTS won one match. Not to mention they lost the night after on the same map. If anything XTS and Froyo would be tied for 1st.[/quote]

Pretty sure we would still be ranked second even if we won our CEVO match. Not that it really matters, because it's just one week and there's a lot of TF2 to be played. I'm just glad content like this is being put out.
21
#21
3 Frags +

@Deathy: Good catch. This time around I wasn't able to get previews to my plethora of proofreaders (london, brownstone, owl) and only mana looked it over. So you can blame the both of us ha. I always want to release the Rankings at 10EST on Sunday which usually is during scrimtime so that is a little tough.

@defy: Here was my thought process. Froyotech lost to XTS on Granary, with clckwrk playing poorly. Did I think Froyotech would've lost if clckwrk wasn't playing poorly? No. Then, Froyotech had to play XTS again on the same map with the same roster. Clckwrk did not play poorly, and Froyotech won the match. I understand that using CEVO matches for ESEA is silly - which is why I only brought it up once - but that CEVO match happened to provide evidence which supported my theory. I'll ignore your comment on bias because if I truly wanted these to be biased I'd just put Mixup at #1 the entire season: they have my favorite Roamer, favorite Scout pair, and favorite Pocket Soldier-turned-Demoman. But anyway, I stated my reasoning as to why *I* think Froyo should still be first. Am I right? Who knows. The 2nd matchup between Froyotech and XTS will help resolve the ranking dispute. It's as simple as that.

@Hellbent: Yeah I wasn't able to look over STVs this week due to being sick (was it casted? I thought that match was skipped, as I can't find the VOD in the TFTV Triple Header Event page). I'm going to try my best for all the future weeks.

@Deathy: Good catch. This time around I wasn't able to get previews to my plethora of proofreaders (london, brownstone, owl) and only mana looked it over. So you can blame the both of us ha. I always want to release the Rankings at 10EST on Sunday which usually is during scrimtime so that is a little tough.

@defy: Here was my thought process. Froyotech lost to XTS on Granary, with clckwrk playing poorly. Did I think Froyotech would've lost if clckwrk wasn't playing poorly? No. Then, Froyotech had to play XTS again on the same map with the same roster. Clckwrk did not play poorly, and Froyotech won the match. I understand that using CEVO matches for ESEA is silly - which is why I only brought it up once - but that CEVO match happened to provide evidence which supported my theory. I'll ignore your comment on bias because if I truly wanted these to be biased I'd just put Mixup at #1 the entire season: they have my favorite Roamer, favorite Scout pair, and favorite Pocket Soldier-turned-Demoman. But anyway, I stated my reasoning as to why *I* think Froyo should still be first. Am I right? Who knows. The 2nd matchup between Froyotech and XTS will help resolve the ranking dispute. It's as simple as that.

@Hellbent: Yeah I wasn't able to look over STVs this week due to being sick (was it casted? I thought that match was skipped, as I can't find the VOD in the TFTV Triple Header Event page). I'm going to try my best for all the future weeks.
22
#22
3 Frags +
Terywj@Hellbent: Yeah I wasn't able to look over STVs this week due to being sick (was it casted? I thought that match was skipped, as I can't find the VOD in the TFTV Triple Header Event page). I'm going to try my best for all the future weeks.

I'm the one who cut up the vod and uploaded to youtube: enigma and I decided not to upload that because only 8 minutes of it were caught on camera and it's honestly a joke of a game (several huntsman snipers, platinum went spy, pyro to mid, etc.). The vod is in the twitch highlights page if you want to watch it but it's not gonna be on youtube and therefore won't be linked in the event. Sorry for any confusion.

[quote=Terywj]
@Hellbent: Yeah I wasn't able to look over STVs this week due to being sick (was it casted? I thought that match was skipped, [b]as I can't find the VOD in the TFTV Triple Header Event page[/b]). I'm going to try my best for all the future weeks.[/quote]

I'm the one who cut up the vod and uploaded to youtube: enigma and I decided not to upload that because only 8 minutes of it were caught on camera and it's honestly a joke of a game (several huntsman snipers, platinum went spy, pyro to mid, etc.). The vod is in the twitch highlights page if you want to watch it but it's not gonna be on youtube and therefore won't be linked in the event. Sorry for any confusion.
23
#23
0 Frags +
hanbroloI'm the one who cut up the vod and uploaded to youtube: enigma and I decided not to upload that because only 8 minutes of it were caught on camera and it's honestly a joke of a game (several huntsman snipers, platinum went spy, pyro to mid, etc.). The vod is in the twitch highlights page if you want to watch it but it's not gonna be on youtube and therefore won't be linked in the event. Sorry for any confusion.

Well then guess I won't lol. Thanks for clarifying.

[quote=hanbrolo]I'm the one who cut up the vod and uploaded to youtube: enigma and I decided not to upload that because only 8 minutes of it were caught on camera and it's honestly a joke of a game (several huntsman snipers, platinum went spy, pyro to mid, etc.). The vod is in the twitch highlights page if you want to watch it but it's not gonna be on youtube and therefore won't be linked in the event. Sorry for any confusion.[/quote]

Well then guess I won't lol. Thanks for clarifying.
24
#24
-5 Frags +

you should it was a really good game
AND
i was the one that got the medic drop

you should it was a really good game
AND
i was the one that got the medic drop
25
#25
2 Frags +

Articles are good to keep up with results of previous rounds, and predictions - especially when I'm not able to watch the games too often.

One thing I'd like to see (it's minor), is for the heading (i.e. the team name) to hyperlink to the team's ESEA page. If this is possible, that'd be neat.

Articles are good to keep up with results of previous rounds, and predictions - especially when I'm not able to watch the games too often.

One thing I'd like to see (it's minor), is for the heading (i.e. the team name) to hyperlink to the team's ESEA page. If this is possible, that'd be neat.
Please sign in through STEAM to post a comment.