| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561197994749697 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:34483969] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:17241984 |
| Country | United States |
| Signed Up | April 1, 2014 |
| Last Posted | May 9, 2025 at 12:29 AM |
| Posts | 2138 (0.5 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | 6.0 |
| Windows Sensitivity | 6/11 |
| Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
1600 |
Resolution |
1920x1080 |
Refresh Rate |
144Hz |
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | Logitech MX Master |
| Keyboard | Ducky 9008G2 Pro Limited Edition (PBT, MX Greens) |
| Mousepad | Razer Sphex |
| Headphones | Philips SHP9500 |
| Monitor | HP L1925 (vert), BenQ XL2420Z, Apple Monitor II |
wareyaI think it might on 8 and 10, but I'm not sure. It depends on whether DWM still asks the drivers for vsync.
DWM still uses full triple buffering in 10, but it now does it on a per-monitor basis instead of across all monitors, so mismatched refresh rates no longer have issues. 8 performs just like 7 except it doesn't have the ability to disable DWM.
I don't get the complaints about weight, my mouse is even heavier and I like it (MX Master, 145g vs the Ducky's 120g). I like my keyboard heavier too, though (MX Greens, like Blues except 80cN instead of 50cN).
DamnEasyIf theres something going on like a video on my 2nd screen my game turns to 60hz, I think tagg made a thread about it once because he had it
tagg made a thread asking and i did some thorough research. it's a bug in win7 and win8 (doesn't seem to be there in 10) with DWM's triple buffering when using desktop compositing, if you have multiple monitors with mismatched refresh rates, when playing in windowed mode. doesn't affect anything fullscreen though so that can't be the issue here.
as someone who has upgraded at least like 50 machines spanning 7, 8, and 8.1...
1. if you care much about performance, don't bother upgrading, back up your data and do a clean install. Upgrading will carry over too many settings from your old OS and it just fucks with 10, makes it really laggy at times, just bloated in general.
2. if you don't care about perf, the upgrade process is really simple, and works flawlessly about 75% of the time. 20% of the time you'll need to search the internet after upgrading in order to fix some minor bugs. 5% of the time you'll get a bug where explorer.exe rapidly crashes and relaunches after you log in, it's currently unfixable and happens in safe mode too. revert to your previous OS and try again, all i can really say.
once 10 is configured it's honestly great, and it runs really well on my machine (i5 2500k, GTX 970, 16GB RAM, SSD). multimonitor support is improved over 8.1 in some respects but worse than even 8 in others, it's kind of weird but definitely fixable. search is vastly improved, i used to use launchy but no more. you might as well give it a shot while you still can.
deykuzorNo, AMD has always had resolution options. Unfortunately, the current version of Radeon Software's Display settings does NOT have resolution options natively yet. You can change this via the Windows method, on Windows 8.1 and 10, right click the desktop, Display Settings > Advanced display settings (which is probably what AMD is assuming) OR within Radeon Software, going to Home > Preferences > Radeon Additional Settings > (this opens the old crappy catalyst driver) > My Digital Flat Panels > Custom Resolutions (Digital Flat-Panel).
What I'm assuming is over time, Radeon Software will incorporate more and more features, until eventually, the old Catalyst software won't be needed at all. For now, it's a holdover for incase you need a feature that hasn't been added into the current ecosystem AMD is trying to create.
As someone who uses both AMD and Nvidia systems, I must say overall I'm very happy with Radeon Software. I like it way more than GeForce Experience. It's just unfortunate that AMD cards aren't breaking any records and the software isn't fully featured like GeForce Experience is right now.
Ohhh you mean the new UI didn't have it. Okay that makes more sense.
Liking the redesign even though I don't have an AMD card. Hopefully NVIDIA will do something similar, GeForce Experience isn't really the same thing.
wait what are you saying INTEL had this before AMD?
http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/sb/img/add_customadvanced.jpg
If you want to get into production and you're passionate about this sort of thing, I heartily recommend you watch Lange's in-depth prod videos, where he breaks down his setup for ToTH and his own stream.
http://alaska-works.com/GG/7949.jpg
literally the best
turns out the game was reverse engineered and modding support was added over a decade later, there's actually a semi-active modding community like holy shit
blankethey, can someone tell me which file do I edit to fix this? Everything else is fine. Great hud!
https://imgur.com/W2W08PV
running on 16:10 1440x900
read a few pages back, I said something about this explicitly. look for console commands, there's like three of them.
phobiai bought this game like 3 days ago but havent played it lol. I don't wanna play it and get nauseous like i did when i played fall out 3
and get nauseous? what, FOV?
glsshit, I knew about that feature but I didn't think to use it for this purpose, thanks.definitely saves a lot of time
re: giving items to dogmeat, I don't have a companion but I feel like it would be insanely annoying to (again) remember which items are theirs, take all, give their shit back to them, etc. with dogmeat it's just dog armor but even that I feel like is pretty silly
settlers definitely do some stuff on their own, I had a bunch of crops set up for one of the settlements, I set up the bell, 0 settlers, came back to add more shit and one guy was already farmin away the tatos
anything they're wearing shows the equipped icon, i just avoid those
also you can manually rename their items too, so like, "Piper's Hat", "Piper's Coat", etc
new settlers are automatically set to farm any available crops, you usually don't need to handle the farm unless you're making it for the first time for settlers that already exist.
Air_the spot doesn't matter, settlers will work it no matter where it is, the only reason you'd want to put it somewhere accessible is so you don't lose your settlers to re-assign them to stuff later on, but anywhere will provide food for your settlement
don't you want your settlement to look