gemmside note, is it vertical velocity or just speed in general? i've suspicions it's speed since ive taken high fall damage from low heights due to horizontal knockback in the past but im not sure
vertical velocity
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198010123351 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:49857623] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:24928811 |
Country | Sweden |
Signed Up | February 26, 2013 |
Last Posted | March 16, 2024 at 12:10 PM |
Posts | 684 (0.2 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | 3.9 |
Windows Sensitivity | 6/11 |
Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
400 |
Resolution |
1920x1080 |
Refresh Rate |
240Hz |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | Logitech G Pro |
Keyboard | Varmilo VEA88 Charcoal V2 TKL MX Red |
Mousepad | SteelSeries QcK+ |
Headphones | HyperX Cloud Alpha |
Monitor | Alienware AW2518HF |
gemmside note, is it vertical velocity or just speed in general? i've suspicions it's speed since ive taken high fall damage from low heights due to horizontal knockback in the past but im not sure
vertical velocity
just look up dudes, no need to ban this
TwiiKuu#5
#6
I'd be happy to change the OP with PugChamp Rules (timelimit 30, windiff 2, windiff min 5), IMHO this thread is more about finding a compromise to abolish ESEA ruleset (mainly the two halves), all in all there's not a huge amount of deviation from ETF2L/OZ ruleset.
Min windiff 2 should be an improvement to the ruleset in the OP. It would still end certain games too soon. I'd say ending a 5-3 match with 5 minutes on the clock would still be undesirable because that's when the crunch time kicks in.
Winlimit 5 sometimes ends games prematurely when a comeback would still be possible. This is especially bad if there's a fast paced game ending way too soon. It does not eliminate dead time at all any more than windifference 5 would, unless the win condition is met, which is rarely because stalemating is still going to be a desirable strategy for the winning team if the time limit is still 30. Both the EU and the ESEA rulesets are better than this compromise.
Edit: this has been tried and tested before. Not sure what's different this time around.
cu@
Edit: Hotels and travel booked!
Stinson_OutAm I the only one who is happy about the fact that there is yet another TF2 event? As Toast said, people who preferingly play Highlander come to 6v6 LANs regardless because they want to hang out with their friends that they play with online week in and week out. Why cant it be the other way round?
I have honestly never wondered what gamemode is being played at a LAN when considering to attend. Logistics, accommodation, and in the end budget was always a far more important concern. I love TF2 and I couldnt care less if I am playing 9v9 or 6v6., LANs are awesome! Cu@!
My body is ready for the shit and the downfrags I am about to get for this.
Low effort troll.
gemmStarkiegemmall the tool does though is stitch it together into a nice demo, other games will also have tools to do that or tools for swapping saves quickly etc. should still be called segmented imo but w/e at this pointwell you could have loads of segments in quick succession with multiple in a second, doesnt really seem like a segmented run to me
as do many segmented runs in other games (depending on the level of fidelity they're aiming for), just because a tool is involved doesn't make it TAS
The definition of TASes differ from community to community, so you are not entirely wrong. However it is considered a TAS in the TF2 community.
midk bout that man, this season
a 6th place team beat a 5th place team
a 5th place team beat a 3rd place team
also a 4th place team beat a 2nd place team
sure not all of invite is completely competitive but outside of froyo its definitely not as cut-and-dry as u think
i do think once u get out of top 6 things get very onesided, though
That's not my point. The point is that you should spend the money getting 12 NA teams there on getting intercontinental teams so that you would have greater competition.
Out of the 12 teams you are willing to pay flights for, 8 teams will be complete losers because there's a maximum of 4 teams that can compete at a reasonable level in NA.
If you actually have the money to back the project up, don't waste money on the 8 bottom feeder teams and bring in 4 really good teams instead, from all over the world.
FunsflyingbuddyWhat's your craziest LAN story?at i55 I drank some alcohol, you can ask someone else about that one
Or if you don't have one, what's the craziest LAN story you've heard of?
So back in i55 one of my friends (FIR) had gotten Funs so drunk he was almost at the verge of passing out. So for like fifteen minutes I had to take care of this 15 year old underage drinker and tell him encouraging and positive things until we basically asked the security to take care of him instead. I had no idea who he was at the time, just some random kid.
One year later I learn that the kid I took care of was Funs and that he is actually an amazing scout. Wtf.
Got two spots in my hostel room, I'm staying there friday-monday (three nights). 750 SEK (€78) for a spot. Hmu.
EDIT: only one spot left
AdnurakThere's no good reason americans should want to give up their guns,
There's a very good reason Americans should want absolute psychopaths not owning guns (or cars).
Max_ReeroJust a reminder that it is very difficult to obtain an automatic weapon, and the weapon used by the shooter was a semi-automatic rifle modified to be shot automatically. Just want to put that out there.toads_tfReeroJust a reminder that it is very difficult to obtain an automatic weapon, and the weapon used by the shooter was a semi-automatic rifle modified to be shot automatically. Just want to put that out there.has there been concrete information released on the firearms? i'd like to see it if there is, as i've heard all sorts of stuff
I've seen in several different places he most likely used a technique called bump firing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bump_fire
There are so many guns in the US and the gun culture is so ingrained into the US it is pretty much literally impossible to take away guns. In 2009 there were about 310 million registered guns in the US. That was 8 years ago and doesn't include illegal guns. It doesn't matter if making guns illegal is the right thing to do it's feasibly not possible. Likewise with the US changing from imperial to metric, it's logistically impossible to do at this point
Also it's the second amendment right to bear arms not the first fyi
The reason things don't change isn't because they are impossible to change. The reason things don't change is because people don't want things to change. And it has devastating consequences.
Sent them a tweet. I encourage everyone else to do the same.