etf2l and esea are now similar enough in ruleset and playstyles of the top teams for a map being tried in 1 being suitable evidence for both.
they were using gullywash before us, we saw it worked out, and we took it too. they are now going into granary pro, which also seems to be fairly well received.
on our end, we adapted viaduct, process and snakewater before them, all of which were popular, and now they have all three.
on the other hand, we got our hands on sunshine and metalworks first, but neither was super popular. metalworks was tried in eu but they quickly abandoned it. they began playing sunshine but I believe opinions there are mixed to say the least.
however, the level of negative feedback for ALL the maps listed thus far pales in comparison to the feedback that logjam has received. I can barely think of a single prem eu player/team that liked it in the slightest. I don't care if hyce is a nice guy who is still updating it, some maps are fundamentally broken to begin with. if a drug unequivocally fails its first clinical trial, they aren't going to push it on more people before changing it or scrapping it for a new product. I don't see why we need to be lab rats for a map that the last set of lab rats already rejected.