| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561198013620065 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:53354337] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:26677168 |
| Country | Bhutan |
| Signed Up | July 18, 2012 |
| Last Posted | January 7, 2026 at 6:20 PM |
| Posts | 5516 (1.1 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | |
| Windows Sensitivity | |
| Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
|
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | |
| Keyboard | |
| Mousepad | |
| Headphones | |
| Monitor | |
hatsimulator, I don't know how old you are but as someone already said, if you're an adult you can't use being drunk as an excuse for losing all social skills/abilities to be reasonable to other people
it's not exactly impossible to be wasted and still be chill
http://heavytable.com/whats-in-princes-fridge/
RIP to the true mustard overlord
Ond_kajanykLightstrikerIn my opinion they'd be making a huge mistake to stop playing right before i58. They should see whether they can compete with the best before they disappear into an inferior game forever.nykIs there an asian superteam? I don't know the first thing about asiaFortress, but I'm interested in finding out if they do make an appearance
As far as I know, many asian players that were planning on going to i58 (creep, kusoyotech members) have retired from tf2 to play Overwatch. There is a slim chance of them going to i58, but please correct me if I'm wrong.
I can't say I follow much of AsiaFortress but if the grand finals that were played a few weeks ago are an accurate representation of their skill, they would not have much chance to succeed internationally. Makes sense for them to quit while they're ahead.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
solathey rework it in order of how unbalanced they are, currently inferno is the most unbalanced in the rotation, so it gets removed
you are incorrect
the thing about valve is, they don't remove maps for reworks in order of how badly they need changes, they do it in order of how old a map is because they want to update the aesthetic of old maps to match the newer ones
I wish they had gone with updating d2 first tho
fightplaying a card that wasn't "mustardoverlord, am I right guys? haha" seems to have backfired for you
always go for the easy +frags before you pull out the extremist rhetoric, it's shitposting 101
I suspect this is why spacecadet's first post on the previous page still has 11 +frags, because of the people who saw "shut the fuck up mustard" and mashed the button right away
which is fine by me, I now get a great mental image of 11 dudes sitting in front of their computer having it slowly dawn on them what they just agreed to like they're an extra in Borat or something
SpaceCadetmustardoverlordto be fair, it'd be weird to ban sheepy and not ban all the other blatantly racist people around here- $layer, Red_, SpaceCadet, and Forefather immediately come to mind
mustard shut the fuck up, you are the biggest instigator on this message board hands down. Hypocrites like you and your pathetic circle jerk of friends run around with racist names during scrims and ESEA matches regularly. Don't think for 1 second that your names bother me but coming on this board and acting like a hypocrite just shows how much of a fucking idiot you are and why so many people dislike you.
Nothing I ever said on this board has been "blatantly racist" or racist in any way, unless you consider terrorists to be a culture, then yes I am extremely racist. My opinion is different from yours so you label it as something it isn't. I challenge you to find where I have said something in that light. You have made similar claims in the past and then you go silent after you get called out.
1. I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about in terms of me running around with racist names. If someone I know is doing that, I have absolutely no control over it. Not that it's even relevant, but yeah.
2. I am fucking sick and tired of people suggesting that I 'talk a big game' but back out when people argue back. I have never done that, and I will not do that now.
SO without further ado (and oh man do I resent you for making me trawl through your post history just so people with short-term memories can recognize your idiocy), here are a collection of choice SpaceCadet posts, many of which I didn't even know about before now:
http://www.teamfortress.tv/21298/live-from-the-streets/?page=8#227
http://www.teamfortress.tv/21298/live-from-the-streets/?page=7#203
http://www.teamfortress.tv/21298/live-from-the-streets/?page=7#197
http://www.teamfortress.tv/19644/lets-talk-ferguson#28
http://www.teamfortress.tv/19644/lets-talk-ferguson#25
http://www.teamfortress.tv/30408/donald-trump/?page=5#121
http://www.teamfortress.tv/29858/paris-terrorist-attack/?page=11#307
http://www.teamfortress.tv/29858/paris-terrorist-attack/?page=16#471
Like every other racist person in the world, you guys are trying to play the victim card, acting like I'm just harassing you for your opinions. If your opinions are troubling, I have no problem exposing them in a public space, to hopefully make you feel a little bit uneasy about holding such vile views on the world.
You can flip it around all you want and say I'm not respectful enough in the way I conduct myself, or tolerant of other viewpoints, or other such smokescreens to distract people from the ignorant shit you believe. It doesn't bother me.
to be fair, it'd be weird to ban sheepy and not ban all the other blatantly racist people around here- $layer, Red_, SpaceCadet, and Forefather immediately come to mind
their actual views aren't much more enlightened, they just have the social awareness to couch them in language that makes them less crazy on the surface
i've noticed, in fact, that most of those guys' first post in a thread gets +fragged, because most people here are too stupid to see the obvious implications of their argument that they're about to lead a thread down, and it's not until they post again that people start to acknowledge how fucked up what they're saying is
then there are people even more on the borderline than those guys, who either a) don't post enough about such issues to justify a ban, b) mix in enough sarcasm and such into their posts that it's not conclusive how much of the shit they believe, or c) have really backwards opinions on one topic but not others
tough to decide where to draw the line, sheepy is just so visible about it
rangaNando's (that peri peri sauce)
came in here to say nandos
it's top tier
popeyes close second
Nub_DanishmustardoverlordBut having the option to drink milk is a benefit eh?Nub_DanishmustardoverlordHow could being lactose intolerant being anything but inferior smhLsRainbowsNub_DanishLsRainbowsit supports the idea of differences based on ancestry not just black, white, yellow etc which supports the arrangement I've made that people are not inherently equal and your ancestry not race in the traditional sense does mean that people are genetically superior and inferior from one another not necessarily based on the race as in skin color and what not because race is not specific enoughNub_Danishhttp://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/ViewPage.aspx?pageId=79
i have more sources saying essentially the same thing about the relevance of race in medicine if you wanna get past the first paragraph of any of them
Are you trolling? This paper also says there's no basis for biological racial difference...like its right there in the title
I refuse to believe someone is seriously this dumb
this is a far cry from what you said earlier
Nub_Danishraces can be genetically superior to one another this is correct
But no, that paper is literally saying that race is a social construct, from the first paragraph to the last, perhaps you were confused by the wording?? i know words are hard
"As a biological rather than a social construct, “race” has ceased to be seen as a fundamental reality characterizing the human species. "
"If it were admitted that the category of “race” is a purely social construct, however, it would have a weakened legitimacy. Thus, there have been repeated attempts to reassert the objective biological reality of human racial categories despite the evidence to the contrary."
All of this ignores the other completely stupid part of the argument
Even if you can isolate some specific genetic trait as being isolated to one 'race' (for instance, caucasians being much more lactose-tolerant than most other groups), how does that make a race 'superior' or 'inferior'? That terminology is so loaded and meaningless
because you don't have to drink milk to live a happy life...?
Nah, it's fattening
messiahyeah mustard could you please stop having such a big boner whenever there's a thread or topic on tf2 comp history, you fucking dweeb
nope
Nub_DanishmustardoverlordHow could being lactose intolerant being anything but inferior smhLsRainbowsNub_DanishLsRainbowsit supports the idea of differences based on ancestry not just black, white, yellow etc which supports the arrangement I've made that people are not inherently equal and your ancestry not race in the traditional sense does mean that people are genetically superior and inferior from one another not necessarily based on the race as in skin color and what not because race is not specific enoughNub_Danishhttp://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/ViewPage.aspx?pageId=79
i have more sources saying essentially the same thing about the relevance of race in medicine if you wanna get past the first paragraph of any of them
Are you trolling? This paper also says there's no basis for biological racial difference...like its right there in the title
I refuse to believe someone is seriously this dumb
this is a far cry from what you said earlier
Nub_Danishraces can be genetically superior to one another this is correct
But no, that paper is literally saying that race is a social construct, from the first paragraph to the last, perhaps you were confused by the wording?? i know words are hard
"As a biological rather than a social construct, “race” has ceased to be seen as a fundamental reality characterizing the human species. "
"If it were admitted that the category of “race” is a purely social construct, however, it would have a weakened legitimacy. Thus, there have been repeated attempts to reassert the objective biological reality of human racial categories despite the evidence to the contrary."
All of this ignores the other completely stupid part of the argument
Even if you can isolate some specific genetic trait as being isolated to one 'race' (for instance, caucasians being much more lactose-tolerant than most other groups), how does that make a race 'superior' or 'inferior'? That terminology is so loaded and meaningless
because you don't have to drink milk to live a happy life...?
LsRainbowsNub_DanishLsRainbowsit supports the idea of differences based on ancestry not just black, white, yellow etc which supports the arrangement I've made that people are not inherently equal and your ancestry not race in the traditional sense does mean that people are genetically superior and inferior from one another not necessarily based on the race as in skin color and what not because race is not specific enoughNub_Danishhttp://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/ViewPage.aspx?pageId=79
i have more sources saying essentially the same thing about the relevance of race in medicine if you wanna get past the first paragraph of any of them
Are you trolling? This paper also says there's no basis for biological racial difference...like its right there in the title
I refuse to believe someone is seriously this dumb
this is a far cry from what you said earlier
Nub_Danishraces can be genetically superior to one another this is correct
But no, that paper is literally saying that race is a social construct, from the first paragraph to the last, perhaps you were confused by the wording?? i know words are hard
"As a biological rather than a social construct, “race” has ceased to be seen as a fundamental reality characterizing the human species. "
"If it were admitted that the category of “race” is a purely social construct, however, it would have a weakened legitimacy. Thus, there have been repeated attempts to reassert the objective biological reality of human racial categories despite the evidence to the contrary."
All of this ignores the other completely stupid part of the argument
Even if you can isolate some specific genetic trait as being isolated to one 'race' (for instance, caucasians being much more lactose-tolerant than most other groups), how does that make a race 'superior' or 'inferior'? That terminology is so loaded and meaningless
That scene isn't even offensive to gay people, it's "offensive" to overly macho pro wrestler stereotypes under the assumption that they're a) very homophobic and b) probably overcompensating for something
not to read too much into spiderman but yeah
sheepy_dogs_handidk i'm not saying there's anything wrong with not being white but from my point of view whites have accomplished more than a race like blacks. not saying there's anything wrong with the black race but the white race has accomplished more therefore in my eyes making it natural to be proud of being a part of that race.
even if this were a) at all accurate and b) not racist as fuck, it would still be hilarious that you're proud of the accomplishments of other white people, given you are an autistic basement dweller who has never accomplished anything in his life
I guess if u have to be a white supremacist to have self-esteem, go for it