| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561198046110893 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:85845165] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:42922582 |
| Country | United States |
| Signed Up | August 8, 2017 |
| Last Posted | April 16, 2025 at 4:42 PM |
| Posts | 1554 (0.5 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | |
| Windows Sensitivity | |
| Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
|
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | |
| Keyboard | |
| Mousepad | |
| Headphones | |
| Monitor | |
thesqrtminus1ok i tested this config out and i really like it quite a lot!
thanks for making this!
also, do you have a donate link or something like that
thx so much!!!!<3
no i dont have a donate link right now but if you could just donate it to a charity, preferably one for cute animals or helping the unfortunate that would mean a llot to me <3
Hi all,
would appreciate it if people with strong GPUs could do a benchmark with r_occlusion 0/1 and r_fastzreject 0/1 individually and together.
Try out these network settings:
cl_cmdrate 66
cl_updaterate 66
cl_interp_ratio 2
cl_smooth 1
cl_smoothtime 0.15
net_splitrate 2
rate 167580
net_maxcleartime 0.5
net_maxpacketdrop 100
net_splitpacket_maxrate 167581jetzzzzztried the maxframes config and it gave me pretty bad input lag. I did like how it looked though.
Could you please tell me your specs, and also share tf\log.txt from doing con_logfile log.txt cvarlist.
stabbyI dunno, ProcessLasso calls the cores hyper-threading adds "Non-Physical", not sure whether that's technically accurate. Regardless, I get a performance increase by setting hl2.exe to cores 0;2;4;6 and other processes to 1;3;5;7.
Most of these programs that magically handle your CPU better (like core unparker, and process lasso) are made by people who aren't informed as much as the OS and firmware devs who actually know what they're doing.
At least they seem to be in the tail end of development. But knowing Valve, finishing a product seems to always be the hardest part for them. They love to look back and review their finished product and realize new things they can do to improve and polish it before release.
I'm interested in the case changes: they will make for some even rarer unusuals with the changing shared unusual effects.
Well I meant did you set it to "net_splitrate 3" or "net_splitrate to 3"? It should be "net_splitrate 3".
Depends on how many cores you have, how strong those cores are and how well your OS can manage the network threading using your CPU. I would only recommend it on a 4 core CPU at the very least, so the i7 seems to be fine for that.
Are you using a config? What are your net settings?
Whiskersure, here you go: https://www.dropbox.com/s/lyi55ny9imzafvo/log.txt?dl=0
Seems like my config is not being applied. CVars only in my config and not in Comanglia's like lzma_persistent_buffer 1 are not being set.
i think my feet need to be freed from the confines of my shoes as soon as it is safe to do so inside the home.
WhiskerI had an autoexec with an exec line in it. For each test, it would either be `exec gfx_c.cfg` for comanglia's config or `exec gfx_m.cfg` for yours. `gfx_m.cfg` had the `exec maxframes.cfg` line at the bottom uncommented for the second test. I kept the `maxframes.cfg` filename the same.
I wouldn't write this off as not being an issue on my end, though; I may have accidentally ran maxframes for both tests, or something odd like that. That's the only thing on my end that I can think of, though
Could you share tf\console.log from doing con_logfile log.txt and then cvarlist? (when you have my config+maxframes)
phobiaHow come none of the valve employees have twitter accounts
They do though.
Whiskerah just saw your last message, but here are the new benchmarks:
http://i.imgur.com/Dvw0GO8.png
Very strange how maxfps is not having effect on FPS.
How are you installing the config? And what does your exec usage look like?
you named yourself after literally the worst god
WhiskerWindows 10, 64 bit
GeForce GTX 1070 with 8gb VRAM
i7-5930K @ 3.5
16gb of RAM
TF2 historically does not seem to like my PC :(
Are you referring to using -autoconfig between each config or using it once before beginning all of these benchmarks? If the former, I can re-do some. I'm not sure of the proper benchmarking procedures :D
I think it is fine to use -autoconfig while benchmarking because I believe that the autoexec runs after autoconfig.