alexandros's Profile

Account Details
SteamID64	76561198073536735
SteamID3	[U:1:113271007]
SteamID32	STEAM_0:1:56635503
Country	France
Signed Up	July 19, 2015
Last Posted	March 27, 2024 at 10:39 PM
Posts	572 (0.2 per day)

Account Details

SteamID64

76561198073536735

SteamID3

[U:1:113271007]

SteamID32

STEAM_0:1:56635503

Country

France

Signed Up

July 19, 2015

Last Posted

March 27, 2024 at 10:39 PM

Posts

572 (0.2 per day)

Game Settings
In-game Sensitivity
Windows Sensitivity
Raw Input
DPI
Resolution
Refresh Rate

Game Settings

In-game Sensitivity

Windows Sensitivity

Raw Input

DPI

Resolution

Refresh Rate

Hardware Peripherals
Mouse
Keyboard
Mousepad
Headphones
Monitor

Hardware Peripherals

Mouse

Keyboard

Mousepad

Headphones

Monitor

HedoKingogluTERRYCREWSHedoKingogluhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY

I think the fact that there's so much open corruption against him should tell you who to vote.
Not a fan of either candidate but what about the massive amount of sex assault accusations against him? Does that not factor into your opinions at all?
I can rally 10 of my friends and throw an accusation that you groped me. It doesn't make it 100 percent true.

When the media(dems) do not like someone, they prepare to sling shit at that person repeadetly. That is what happened to Rudy Guiliani, its what happened to Julian Assange and its what happened to Bernie (in his case, the media gave him the Ron Paul treatment of "you can't win the primary) and its what's happening to Trump now which btw if you check wikileaks you will see that Hillary rigged the primaries with Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who is now on board of directors of the Clinton campaign or smth right after she resigned.
Small note: Tim Kaine was promised a VP spot on july 2015. He also was the old DNC chairman b4 DWS took over. But its probably a coincidence right guise :^)

Hold on, you're defending Assange?? The same guy Republicans were attacking night and day over wikileaks a few years ago! Don't try to pretend that you guys always loved him. Same goes for Democrats. Each party uses his information, and once finished slandering, go right back to attacking him.

Also the first allegation and many other allegations have been debunked. There are emails where the accusers are connected to the Clinton Campaign. If you don't like, there are some people who say that "they got raped by Trump a long time ago" were praising Trump in their private emails. I wouldn't praise my rapist now would I?

Also its pretty funny that all of these people jumped in and started to accuse Trump when there's 1 month left for the election.
"Hey I got groped 20 years ago! But I'll wait till the time is somehow right"
Also check wikileaks and you will see that this attack was orchestrated 3-4 months ago by the media and Clinton Campaign. I can just dump all the links if you people are too lazy to do your own research.

Trump is grasping at straws making the same accusations back at Clinton. To start with Bill Clinton is not running. Granted, I'd much prefer it if I had Bill Clinton instead of his wife as President, but at the end of the day, he's not even attacking the right person. I'm not going to debate that the Clintons organized this attack, but what I will say is that isn't Fox News considered to be, following what they say about themselves, a mainstream media source? Granted, they have't exactly supported Trump completely, but neither have other sites for Hillary.
ScrewballHedoKingogluI think the fact that there's so much open corruption against him should tell you who to vote.Because the republican party and millionaires are not known for corruption. No sir. Trump is a buffoon and gets called out as such in media. He is such a buffoon that not even the US elites want him because him coming to power would be a textbook case of accelerationism. This doesn't make Hillery better. I am of the personal opinion that they both deserve to be shot. But to say that Trump is getting more negative press for no reason is lunacy.
So you think that Trump's sex allegations deserve 200 minutes of press while wikileaks only deserves 12 minutes (which most are from Fox News) and that it is completely fine? Oh wait, according to CNN; it is actually ILLEGAL to look at wikileaks emails and only the press can show the info to the public. Wow I suppose 1984 really was an instruction manual after all :^)

Last I checked, the Patriot Act was passed under a Republican President. While Clinton certainly supports it as well, it was neither her nor was it her husband's administration that passed that unconstitutional piece of shit into law. And while whoever is elected president will continue to renew it, I just want the record straight as to who established it. Note: Sanders actually voted against it (I wish he was the nominee).

Also do you unironically believe in the following:

That Republican Party elitists support Trump
That he was supposed to get support from the elites in the first place like Hillary?
That calling Trump a buffoon repeadetly like a little kindergarten studennt will make your point acceptable?

I have no idea where you're getting the idea that Trump invested 100 million into his campaign is coming from. The pretty consistent number from my research has been around 50 million. Also, don't give me the "self funded" argument. Trump has financed about 1/3 of his campaign, which is a hefty amount, but him calling my house asking for money doesn't incline me to give to him. Trump is worth, from what I've found, about 3.7 billion. That 50 million he spent on his campaign is chump change. Also, he's not even self made. He still won't release his tax returns for the reason of "I'm being audited" even though the IRS actually came out and said that they are not prohibiting Trump from releasing them. Also, his attacks on Buffet, an actual self-made man, were vile, and blew up in his face when Buffet released all his tax returns since 1944, showing that he never used the "carry forward" loophole. I also have a hard time justifying supporting a man who tries to avoid paying people, like contractors, who worked for him.

You can easily fling bullshit about "Trump Corruption" that are factually proven to be debunked and incorrect constantly. But if you really think that someone who invests 100 million dollars to his own presidential campaign and does not suck up to the lobbyist is going to be a "corrupt president". Then you really have no idea what the hell you are talking about.

I can't really blame you, I would hate Trump too if I only listened to the Mainstream Media and refused to watch his rallies or his events. The difference is, some people make their own research and use common sense while some people would rather throw a temper tantrum over things they do not like.

Speaking of foreign policy, I wonder how Trump is viewed in Europe? When I was there (for a year in France last year) I met very, very few people that supported him, and I was in a region (the north) that was voting extreme right. So just image wise, Trump is giving us a bad name already. Do you really think it'll get much better if he's president? And since the U.S. is a "failed nation" why don't you tell me how we're arrogant enough to think that we need to take a leadership position in the world. And I posit to you this: When was the last time America was great, in your opinion?

I've read the things you've written to others in response when it comes to foreign politics and you sound a little like Trump over the fact of the US' failed nation building and the stupid things that the US does in the foreign policy. I would advise you to watch the Commander in Chief forum and the South Carolina GOP primary debate so you can see what I am talking about.