Alexandros
Account Details
SteamID64 76561198073536735
SteamID3 [U:1:113271007]
SteamID32 STEAM_0:1:56635503
Country France
Signed Up July 19, 2015
Last Posted April 29, 2025 at 10:35 PM
Posts 580 (0.2 per day)
Game Settings
In-game Sensitivity
Windows Sensitivity
Raw Input  
DPI
 
Resolution
 
Refresh Rate
 
Hardware Peripherals
Mouse  
Keyboard  
Mousepad  
Headphones  
Monitor  
1 ⋅⋅ 34 35 36 37 38 39
#84 VTF Crosshair pack in Customization

I've been using seeker's for a few months now. However, I tried to switch it to stark's/thalash's version of it. For some reason, it now shows no crosshair on my screen when I use "crosshair 1" in console. I tried switching back to regular seeker but no dice. Also, it was only weapons that I edited. The weapons who's crosshairs I didn't ry to change didn't get screwed up. Has anyone else had this problem/does anyone know how to fix this?

posted about 8 years ago
#701 2016 election live results in World Events
dollarlayer@690

“He also wants to create a network that monitors domestic Muslims.”

Oh like the NSA that spies on everyone? After the terrorist attacks in France they went in and audited several mosques and shut down several after finding jihadist documents and weapons. I remember hearing that Trump said that people should report suspicious activity and not be afraid of the PC police. He said this about the San Bernardino attacks where the couple had bombs around their house and neighbors suspected something wasn’t right but never said anything because they didn’t want to feel like they were stereotyping someone.

.

The NSA does spy on everyone by definition, whether you want to admit it or not. However, the quantity of material they have to sift through is immense, so it doesn't help them to determine when an attack will happen. In all their years of operation, they have not once stopped a terrorist attack. However, they do have the people that commit these atrocities on watch-lists, which accomplishes nothing. The NSA basically follows the "seeing everything, understanding nothing" which, combined with the ease at which its targets could be shifted, makes it an organization that should not exist, in my opinion. Orwell apparently just got the year wrong.

However, I do agree with you that people should trust the police and should report suspicious activity. However, how many calls would the police get per day of "I don't trust my neighbor" which turned out to be false? How many hours of police time would be wasted by doing this? Granted, I have no problem taking away from speed trap time that makes the individual counties money, but I also wonder how many crimes would be prevented if police patrolled instead of sat in speed traps, which, I should point out, is not the officers' fault, it's the people giving the orders telling them to go out and do these speed traps, as they have become a reliable source of revenue.

An idea to prevent the looking into numerous calls would be to have a standard where if neighbors all around the individual were calling in about him then the police would look into it.

In response to your comment about how he "wants to keep the press honest", the way he has acted and spoken has indicated that he wants to reduce freedom of the press. While this is not without precedent even within the U.S. (e.g. the Alien and Sedition Acts) they never ended well, and the presidents behind them are poorly viewed in history. The fact that he also wishes to direct these restrictions towards those who speak out against him is worrisome, as that was the intent behind that freedom in the constitution. I saw a post (not on tftv) saying that we need to trust Trump because he is our President. This is false, and also, not what the founding fathers intended. We have the rights to speak freely carry firearms and have due process and etc. because we need to be able to effectively say that the government is in the wrong. Anyone who removes these rights from us is effectively un-American (unless these rights put us in danger, i.e yelling fire in a crowded theater.).

I believe in the constitution, and as such, I have a problem with our past, current, and future president trying to reduce the rights it provides us. The one exception I will make to this is assault rifles and magazine sizes. If you're military/have military training I have no problem with it, but I (even as someone who enjoys going to shooting ranges) finds them a bit much. I don't see the need for a massive magazine in any shape or form, but I would be fine with assault weapons if and only if the person in possession of the weapon was trained in its use. Other than that, (and even that I'm on the fence about) leave our constitution alone. The NSA is unconstitutional in my eyes, on the grounds of illegal search and seizure, without a warrant and other necessities.

posted about 8 years ago
#11 Global Whitelist Meeting #2 in TF2 General Discussion

This is just my opinion, but could you create a list of weapons that absolutely need to be banned at the top level of play, and then have others vote on other weapons which, while less powerful, are still cancer to play with/against? I understand that this would have the negative impact of people voting who aren't really experienced enough, but I still feel that the community in general should have a bit of say, because, other then for the purposes of transparency, what purpose does recording a VOD serve? I mean, we won't be able to contest a ruling made in said VOD, nor will most people have direct access to someone participating in the discussion to have their thoughts heard. This may not be what you guys intend to do, but I feel that voting for weapons could have the impact of making community more involved in their game.

posted about 8 years ago
#4 hate being sober lfp im in Recruitment (looking for players)

I'd be down for a demo tryout

It'd be my first time at that level, but I'm love a chance.

posted about 8 years ago
#1 ETF2L S25 W6: Animate vs. ChampGG.K! in Matches

No blade?

posted about 8 years ago
#55 What do you put on your pizza? in Off Topic

Plain is my preferred

posted about 8 years ago
#4 ETF2L S25 W5: Animate vs. Danger Dogs in Matches

Blade to kill it

posted about 8 years ago
#575 Donald Trump in World Events
Screwball@ #572
Just because i think Trump is a buffoon doesn't mean i support Hillary or that i don't know what Hillary has been up to. To say i have no faith in the US government and electoral system would be the underestimation of the century. Also if you think i get my information from the mainstream media then you are dead wrong.

As i already stated the elites of both parties don't support him. Just because the elites don't support him doesn't suddenly mean you should support him. Unless your goal is accelerationism then by all means let him burn it to the ground. I couldn't care less.

AlsoWhen was the last time America was great, in your opinion?Never

You seem to think i am some sort of liberal.

The question was directed toward Hedo lol

posted about 8 years ago
#573 Donald Trump in World Events

Sorry Hedo, my points got added to the quote. They are located after your first, third, fourth, fifth, and right before your last paragraph.

posted about 8 years ago
#572 Donald Trump in World Events
HedoKingogluTERRYCREWSHedoKingogluhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY

I think the fact that there's so much open corruption against him should tell you who to vote.

Not a fan of either candidate but what about the massive amount of sex assault accusations against him? Does that not factor into your opinions at all?

I can rally 10 of my friends and throw an accusation that you groped me. It doesn't make it 100 percent true.

When the media(dems) do not like someone, they prepare to sling shit at that person repeadetly. That is what happened to Rudy Guiliani, its what happened to Julian Assange and its what happened to Bernie (in his case, the media gave him the Ron Paul treatment of "you can't win the primary) and its what's happening to Trump now which btw if you check wikileaks you will see that Hillary rigged the primaries with Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who is now on board of directors of the Clinton campaign or smth right after she resigned.
Small note: Tim Kaine was promised a VP spot on july 2015. He also was the old DNC chairman b4 DWS took over. But its probably a coincidence right guise :^)

Hold on, you're defending Assange?? The same guy Republicans were attacking night and day over wikileaks a few years ago! Don't try to pretend that you guys always loved him. Same goes for Democrats. Each party uses his information, and once finished slandering, go right back to attacking him.

Also the first allegation and many other allegations have been debunked. There are emails where the accusers are connected to the Clinton Campaign. If you don't like, there are some people who say that "they got raped by Trump a long time ago" were praising Trump in their private emails. I wouldn't praise my rapist now would I?

Also its pretty funny that all of these people jumped in and started to accuse Trump when there's 1 month left for the election.
"Hey I got groped 20 years ago! But I'll wait till the time is somehow right"
Also check wikileaks and you will see that this attack was orchestrated 3-4 months ago by the media and Clinton Campaign. I can just dump all the links if you people are too lazy to do your own research.

Trump is grasping at straws making the same accusations back at Clinton. To start with Bill Clinton is not running. Granted, I'd much prefer it if I had Bill Clinton instead of his wife as President, but at the end of the day, he's not even attacking the right person. I'm not going to debate that the Clintons organized this attack, but what I will say is that isn't Fox News considered to be, following what they say about themselves, a mainstream media source? Granted, they have't exactly supported Trump completely, but neither have other sites for Hillary.
ScrewballHedoKingogluI think the fact that there's so much open corruption against him should tell you who to vote.Because the republican party and millionaires are not known for corruption. No sir. Trump is a buffoon and gets called out as such in media. He is such a buffoon that not even the US elites want him because him coming to power would be a textbook case of accelerationism. This doesn't make Hillery better. I am of the personal opinion that they both deserve to be shot. But to say that Trump is getting more negative press for no reason is lunacy.
So you think that Trump's sex allegations deserve 200 minutes of press while wikileaks only deserves 12 minutes (which most are from Fox News) and that it is completely fine? Oh wait, according to CNN; it is actually ILLEGAL to look at wikileaks emails and only the press can show the info to the public. Wow I suppose 1984 really was an instruction manual after all :^)

Last I checked, the Patriot Act was passed under a Republican President. While Clinton certainly supports it as well, it was neither her nor was it her husband's administration that passed that unconstitutional piece of shit into law. And while whoever is elected president will continue to renew it, I just want the record straight as to who established it. Note: Sanders actually voted against it (I wish he was the nominee).

Also do you unironically believe in the following:

That Republican Party elitists support Trump
That he was supposed to get support from the elites in the first place like Hillary?
That calling Trump a buffoon repeadetly like a little kindergarten studennt will make your point acceptable?

I have no idea where you're getting the idea that Trump invested 100 million into his campaign is coming from. The pretty consistent number from my research has been around 50 million. Also, don't give me the "self funded" argument. Trump has financed about 1/3 of his campaign, which is a hefty amount, but him calling my house asking for money doesn't incline me to give to him. Trump is worth, from what I've found, about 3.7 billion. That 50 million he spent on his campaign is chump change. Also, he's not even self made. He still won't release his tax returns for the reason of "I'm being audited" even though the IRS actually came out and said that they are not prohibiting Trump from releasing them. Also, his attacks on Buffet, an actual self-made man, were vile, and blew up in his face when Buffet released all his tax returns since 1944, showing that he never used the "carry forward" loophole. I also have a hard time justifying supporting a man who tries to avoid paying people, like contractors, who worked for him.

You can easily fling bullshit about "Trump Corruption" that are factually proven to be debunked and incorrect constantly. But if you really think that someone who invests 100 million dollars to his own presidential campaign and does not suck up to the lobbyist is going to be a "corrupt president". Then you really have no idea what the hell you are talking about.

I can't really blame you, I would hate Trump too if I only listened to the Mainstream Media and refused to watch his rallies or his events. The difference is, some people make their own research and use common sense while some people would rather throw a temper tantrum over things they do not like.

Speaking of foreign policy, I wonder how Trump is viewed in Europe? When I was there (for a year in France last year) I met very, very few people that supported him, and I was in a region (the north) that was voting extreme right. So just image wise, Trump is giving us a bad name already. Do you really think it'll get much better if he's president? And since the U.S. is a "failed nation" why don't you tell me how we're arrogant enough to think that we need to take a leadership position in the world. And I posit to you this: When was the last time America was great, in your opinion?

I've read the things you've written to others in response when it comes to foreign politics and you sound a little like Trump over the fact of the US' failed nation building and the stupid things that the US does in the foreign policy. I would advise you to watch the Commander in Chief forum and the South Carolina GOP primary debate so you can see what I am talking about.
posted about 8 years ago
#3 Crack Clan org comes back to TF2 in TF2 General Discussion

Félicitations à Backget Foolery!

posted about 9 years ago
#2 Is ChampGG.K vs top5rocket going to be casted? in TF2 General Discussion

I hope so!

posted about 9 years ago
#59 Free stuff in Off Topic

I'm down for the solly items, + the unusual (I don't have one and never have :( )

posted about 9 years ago
#38 players you like pugging with in TF2 General Discussion

funs flushy scyper leyo phapha daul acab scyper scorpion n3 lanzer ixy blade Honey and lots of others

posted about 9 years ago
#2 ETF2L S25 W1: Animate vs. LEGO in Matches

Leyo!

posted about 9 years ago
1 ⋅⋅ 34 35 36 37 38 39