Bump

Great guy, really cool and fun to play with. Good dm, and just nutter in general

bump

bump, cool dude, only throws in mixes, actually wants to play the game

bump

Good soldier, and overall good guy. Not nearly as toxic as he's made out to be. Solid pickup for top open/IM.

Yes it looks cool

I've been using seeker's for a few months now. However, I tried to switch it to stark's/thalash's version of it. For some reason, it now shows no crosshair on my screen when I use "crosshair 1" in console. I tried switching back to regular seeker but no dice. Also, it was only weapons that I edited. The weapons who's crosshairs I didn't ry to change didn't get screwed up. Has anyone else had this problem/does anyone know how to fix this?

The NSA does spy on everyone by definition, whether you want to admit it or not. However, the quantity of material they have to sift through is immense, so it doesn't help them to determine when an attack will happen. In all their years of operation, they have not once stopped a terrorist attack. However, they do have the people that commit these atrocities on watch-lists, which accomplishes nothing. The NSA basically follows the "seeing everything, understanding nothing" which, combined with the ease at which its targets could be shifted, makes it an organization that should not exist, in my opinion. Orwell apparently just got the year wrong.

However, I do agree with you that people should trust the police and should report suspicious activity. However, how many calls would the police get per day of "I don't trust my neighbor" which turned out to be false? How many hours of police time would be wasted by doing this? Granted, I have no problem taking away from speed trap time that makes the individual counties money, but I also wonder how many crimes would be prevented if police patrolled instead of sat in speed traps, which, I should point out, is not the officers' fault, it's the people giving the orders telling them to go out and do these speed traps, as they have become a reliable source of revenue.

An idea to prevent the looking into numerous calls would be to have a standard where if neighbors all around the individual were calling in about him then the police would look into it.

In response to your comment about how he "wants to keep the press honest", the way he has acted and spoken has indicated that he wants to reduce freedom of the press. While this is not without precedent even within the U.S. (e.g. the Alien and Sedition Acts) they never ended well, and the presidents behind them are poorly viewed in history. The fact that he also wishes to direct these restrictions towards those who speak out against him is worrisome, as that was the intent behind that freedom in the constitution. I saw a post (not on tftv) saying that we need to trust Trump because he is our President. This is false, and also, not what the founding fathers intended. We have the rights to speak freely carry firearms and have due process and etc. because we need to be able to effectively say that the government is in the wrong. Anyone who removes these rights from us is effectively un-American (unless these rights put us in danger, i.e yelling fire in a crowded theater.).

I believe in the constitution, and as such, I have a problem with our past, current, and future president trying to reduce the rights it provides us. The one exception I will make to this is assault rifles and magazine sizes. If you're military/have military training I have no problem with it, but I (even as someone who enjoys going to shooting ranges) finds them a bit much. I don't see the need for a massive magazine in any shape or form, but I would be fine with assault weapons if and only if the person in possession of the weapon was trained in its use. Other than that, (and even that I'm on the fence about) leave our constitution alone. The NSA is unconstitutional in my eyes, on the grounds of illegal search and seizure, without a warrant and other necessities.

This is just my opinion, but could you create a list of weapons that absolutely need to be banned at the top level of play, and then have others vote on other weapons which, while less powerful, are still cancer to play with/against? I understand that this would have the negative impact of people voting who aren't really experienced enough, but I still feel that the community in general should have a bit of say, because, other then for the purposes of transparency, what purpose does recording a VOD serve? I mean, we won't be able to contest a ruling made in said VOD, nor will most people have direct access to someone participating in the discussion to have their thoughts heard. This may not be what you guys intend to do, but I feel that voting for weapons could have the impact of making community more involved in their game.

I'd be down for a demo tryout

It'd be my first time at that level, but I'm love a chance.

No blade?

Plain is my preferred

Blade to kill it

The question was directed toward Hedo lol