Upvote Upvoted 0 Downvote Downvoted
Best cfg 2018 (results)
posted in Q/A Help
1
#1
0 Frags +

Hello there!

I wanted to ask which configuration is the best for me and maybe for you guys

here the list what i tested :
// chris maxframes : 2639 frames 24.923 seconds 105.89 fps ( 9.44 ms/f) 13.124 fps variability
// comanglia 2015, 18 december : 2639 frames 25.855 seconds 102.07 fps ( 9.80 ms/f) 13.360 fps variability
// stability toaster: 2639 frames 25.051 seconds 105.35 fps ( 9.49 ms/f) 11.930 fps variability
// raphosky : 2639 frames 28.382 seconds 92.98 fps (10.75 ms/f) 10.167 fps variability
// comanglia mastercoms : 2639 frames 22.627 seconds 116.63 fps ( 8.57 ms/f) 14.494 fps variability
// comanglia toaster mastercoms : 2639 frames 23.727 seconds 111.22 fps ( 8.99 ms/f) 11.870 fps variability
// normal stability : 2639 frames 23.067 seconds 114.40 fps ( 8.74 ms/f) 15.479 fps variability
// filitering stability : 2639 frames 25.488 seconds 103.54 fps ( 9.66 ms/f) 10.788 fps variability
// shadowburn cfg : 2639 frames 24.788 seconds 106.46 fps ( 9.39 ms/f) 13.924 fps variabil
// comanglia fps cfg 1.7a , 17 may 2015 : 2639 frames 28.910 seconds 91.28 fps (10.95 ms/f) 9.861 fps variability
// maximum preset + autoexec masterconfig : 2639 frames 26.088 seconds 101.16 fps ( 9.89 ms/f) 12.268 fps variability
// Inspired by Chris, FUNKe, Rhapsody and Comanglia config (oldschool pack) : 2639 frames 24.712 seconds 106.79 fps ( 9.36 ms/f) 14.517 fps variability
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjkHfgAUDWQ
// Random config (oldschool pack) : 2639 frames 23.615 seconds 111.75 fps ( 8.95 ms/f) 11.986 fps variability
http://etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-31963/page-2/

My Toaster (xd) :
// -intel pentium 2 cores
// -geforce 605
// -4gb ram
// -only hdd
//-windows 8 (not 8.1)

launch options : -nohltv -noassert -nocrashdialog -nominidumps -novid -nojoy -nosteamcontroller -noff -softparticlesdefaultoff
res: 1024 x 768 (streght) 75hz

[i] Hello there! [/i]

I wanted to ask which configuration is the best for me and maybe for you guys

here the list what i tested :
// chris maxframes : 2639 frames 24.923 seconds 105.89 fps ( 9.44 ms/f) 13.124 fps variability
// comanglia 2015, 18 december : 2639 frames 25.855 seconds 102.07 fps ( 9.80 ms/f) 13.360 fps variability
// stability toaster: 2639 frames 25.051 seconds 105.35 fps ( 9.49 ms/f) 11.930 fps variability
// raphosky : 2639 frames 28.382 seconds 92.98 fps (10.75 ms/f) 10.167 fps variability
// comanglia mastercoms : 2639 frames 22.627 seconds 116.63 fps ( 8.57 ms/f) 14.494 fps variability
// comanglia toaster mastercoms : 2639 frames 23.727 seconds 111.22 fps ( 8.99 ms/f) 11.870 fps variability
// normal stability : 2639 frames 23.067 seconds 114.40 fps ( 8.74 ms/f) 15.479 fps variability
// filitering stability : 2639 frames 25.488 seconds 103.54 fps ( 9.66 ms/f) 10.788 fps variability
// shadowburn cfg : 2639 frames 24.788 seconds 106.46 fps ( 9.39 ms/f) 13.924 fps variabil
// comanglia fps cfg 1.7a , 17 may 2015 : 2639 frames 28.910 seconds 91.28 fps (10.95 ms/f) 9.861 fps variability
// maximum preset + autoexec masterconfig : 2639 frames 26.088 seconds 101.16 fps ( 9.89 ms/f) 12.268 fps variability
// Inspired by Chris, FUNKe, Rhapsody and Comanglia config (oldschool pack) : 2639 frames 24.712 seconds 106.79 fps ( 9.36 ms/f) 14.517 fps variability
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjkHfgAUDWQ
// Random config (oldschool pack) : 2639 frames 23.615 seconds 111.75 fps ( 8.95 ms/f) 11.986 fps variability
http://etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-31963/page-2/

My Toaster (xd) :
// -intel pentium 2 cores
// -geforce 605
// -4gb ram
// -only hdd
//-windows 8 (not 8.1)

launch options : -nohltv -noassert -nocrashdialog -nominidumps -novid -nojoy -nosteamcontroller -noff -softparticlesdefaultoff
res: 1024 x 768 (streght) 75hz
2
#2
8 Frags +

You should run more than one benchmark per config for reliable results.
The first benchmark when you load the game is always lower FPS than the following ones.

You should run more than one benchmark per config for reliable results.
The first benchmark when you load the game is always lower FPS than the following ones.
3
#3
-2 Frags +
sageYou should run more than one benchmark per config for reliable results.
The first benchmark when you load the game is always lower FPS than the following ones.

hmm maybe higher fps, but still results should be showing which is better i think
besides i don't want to install again all these i just want to know which one is best.

[quote=sage]You should run more than one benchmark per config for reliable results.
The first benchmark when you load the game is always lower FPS than the following ones.[/quote]

hmm maybe higher fps, but still results should be showing which is better i think
besides i don't want to install again all these i just want to know which one is best.
4
#4
1 Frags +

Is the mastercomfig "maximum preset" maxquality or maxperformance? Those would have pretty different results, and I'm guessing from the lower fps that it's maxquality which doesn't seem like a very good comparison.

Is the mastercomfig "maximum preset" maxquality or maxperformance? Those would have pretty different results, and I'm guessing from the lower fps that it's maxquality which doesn't seem like a very good comparison.
5
#5
0 Frags +
JarateKingIs the mastercomfig "maximum preset" maxquality or maxperformance? Those would have pretty different results, and I'm guessing from the lower fps that it's maxquality which doesn't seem like a very good comparison.

maxpreformance + autoexec this is ...

[quote=JarateKing]Is the mastercomfig "maximum preset" maxquality or maxperformance? Those would have pretty different results, and I'm guessing from the lower fps that it's maxquality which doesn't seem like a very good comparison.[/quote]

maxpreformance + autoexec this is ...
6
#6
-7 Frags +

umm so whats the best config u used then?
:D

umm so whats the best config u used then?
:D
Please sign in through STEAM to post a comment.