DanceNumberswagmachineyou dont even need ac stuff to see hes hacking. im not even talking about watching the demos, just look at the logs:
http://logs.tf/1283668?highlight=76561198122526010 800 dpm and 90% accuracy? center bans people for all kinds of reasons but banning them for cheating is a big nono?
I don't get your point, of course he will be banned. As long as ban request has been made a moderator will review it and then take action. Typically bans are handled in that manner, although it is possible a mod reading this thread will find the evidence posted sufficient and ban the player.
If you want to see the reasons players can/will be banned read their rules section. (once the site is back up). It covers almost 99% of cases where someone might get banned.
Aside from that this thread is about getting this player banned on etf2l so he doesn't cheat in officials.
All sensitive ban requests are handled in a separate part of the forum invisible to anyone except for mods and admins. We treat every ban request seriously, and if sufficient enough evidence is provided (such as in this case), bans are issued out as soon as possible. To speed up the processing of a ban request such as this, either provide tick values alongside the STV, or even a video such as this. As far as I know, this user was banned for hacking.
[quote=DanceNumber][quote=swagmachine]
you dont even need ac stuff to see hes hacking. im not even talking about watching the demos, just look at the logs:
http://logs.tf/1283668?highlight=76561198122526010 800 dpm and 90% accuracy? center bans people for all kinds of reasons but banning them for cheating is a big nono?[/quote]
I don't get your point, of course he will be banned. As long as ban request has been made a moderator will review it and then take action. Typically bans are handled in that manner, although it is possible a mod reading this thread will find the evidence posted sufficient and ban the player.
If you want to see the reasons players can/will be banned read their rules section. (once the site is back up). It covers almost 99% of cases where someone might get banned.
Aside from that this thread is about getting this player banned on etf2l so he doesn't cheat in officials.[/quote]
All sensitive ban requests are handled in a separate part of the forum invisible to anyone except for mods and admins. We treat every ban request seriously, and if sufficient enough evidence is provided (such as in this case), bans are issued out as soon as possible. To speed up the processing of a ban request such as this, either provide tick values alongside the STV, or even a video such as this. As far as I know, this user was banned for hacking.
dollarlayerquintoshim just saying except for a couple rockets it doesn't actually look like an aimbot or wallhack (after knowing that he is using a prediction aimbot you could only assume the others are aimbotted too), stv demos aren't lag compensated so you'll find soldiers swipe into the direction of a player after firing a rocket a lot
LOL. It's projectile silent aimbot. You can only assume lag compensation if his cross hair at one point or another was pointed at the player. But when you have rockets coming out at 30-40 degree angles and he didn't move his crosshair to that player in the second prior or second after the rocket, its pretty easy to detect and understand that its a silent projectile hack. He has the aimbot fov cranked very high so it look blatant.
completly misinterpreted what i said. thats why i said "except for a couple rockets" but ok, just trying to prevent people from reporting false cheaters because they saw a soldier's rocket not come out from the crosshair
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=quintosh]im just saying except for a couple rockets it doesn't actually look like an aimbot or wallhack (after knowing that he is using a prediction aimbot you could only assume the others are aimbotted too), stv demos aren't lag compensated so you'll find soldiers swipe into the direction of a player after firing a rocket a lot[/quote]
LOL. It's projectile silent aimbot. You can only assume lag compensation if his cross hair at one point or another was pointed at the player. But when you have rockets coming out at 30-40 degree angles and he didn't move his crosshair to that player in the second prior or second after the rocket, its pretty easy to detect and understand that its a silent projectile hack. He has the aimbot fov cranked very high so it look blatant.[/quote]
completly misinterpreted what i said. thats why i said "except for a couple rockets" but ok, just trying to prevent people from reporting false cheaters because they saw a soldier's rocket not come out from the crosshair
quintoshdollarlayerquintoshim just saying except for a couple rockets it doesn't actually look like an aimbot or wallhack (after knowing that he is using a prediction aimbot you could only assume the others are aimbotted too), stv demos aren't lag compensated so you'll find soldiers swipe into the direction of a player after firing a rocket a lot
LOL. It's projectile silent aimbot. You can only assume lag compensation if his cross hair at one point or another was pointed at the player. But when you have rockets coming out at 30-40 degree angles and he didn't move his crosshair to that player in the second prior or second after the rocket, its pretty easy to detect and understand that its a silent projectile hack. He has the aimbot fov cranked very high so it look blatant.
completly misinterpreted what i said. thats why i said "except for a couple rockets" but ok, just trying to prevent people from reporting false cheaters because they saw a soldier's rocket not come out from the crosshair
i do understand being objectively skeptical to hacking situations and seeing where you could reasonably see assume the legitimacy of something and that it could be legit
but theres a certain point where that angle should stop seeing ambiguity and that angle is about 40 degrees
[quote=quintosh][quote=dollarlayer][quote=quintosh]im just saying except for a couple rockets it doesn't actually look like an aimbot or wallhack (after knowing that he is using a prediction aimbot you could only assume the others are aimbotted too), stv demos aren't lag compensated so you'll find soldiers swipe into the direction of a player after firing a rocket a lot[/quote]
LOL. It's projectile silent aimbot. You can only assume lag compensation if his cross hair at one point or another was pointed at the player. But when you have rockets coming out at 30-40 degree angles and he didn't move his crosshair to that player in the second prior or second after the rocket, its pretty easy to detect and understand that its a silent projectile hack. He has the aimbot fov cranked very high so it look blatant.[/quote]
completly misinterpreted what i said. thats why i said "except for a couple rockets" but ok, just trying to prevent people from reporting false cheaters because they saw a soldier's rocket not come out from the crosshair[/quote]
i do understand being objectively skeptical to hacking situations and seeing where you could reasonably see assume the legitimacy of something and that it could be legit
but theres a certain point where that angle should stop seeing ambiguity and that angle is about 40 degrees