Upvote Upvoted 5 Downvote Downvoted
1 2
Valve's comp Format?
31
#31
13 Frags +
MikeMatExpect nothing so you cant be disappointed.
Show Content

The obvious.

[quote=MikeMat]Expect nothing so you cant be disappointed.[/quote]

[spoiler][img]https://puu.sh/wbPFX/fd3649cab9.png[/img][/spoiler]

The obvious.
32
#32
3 Frags +

Step 1: Expect nothing
Step 2: Expect them to fix the most obvious problems of the stuff they introduce in the update
Step 3: wait 12 months
Step 4: repeat

on a sidenote i think HL replacing casual would be pretty fun, at least someone else could take sniper so the cheaters cant use it.

Step 1: Expect nothing
Step 2: Expect them to fix the most obvious problems of the stuff they introduce in the update
Step 3: wait 12 months
Step 4: repeat

on a sidenote i think HL replacing casual would be pretty fun, at least someone else could take sniper so the cheaters cant use it.
33
#33
8 Frags +
sageon a sidenote i think HL replacing casual would be pretty fun, at least someone else could take sniper so the cheaters cant use it.

I wouldn't mind this tbh atleast it's not going to be a 24 man cluster like pubs right now.

Tob..........

This idea isn't too bad either just need to give me a reason to grind like hats and weapons drops would be pretty nice and I dont like using dx90 either since I dont want to be doing like 30fps.

[quote=sage]on a sidenote i think HL replacing casual would be pretty fun, at least someone else could take sniper so the cheaters cant use it.[/quote]

I wouldn't mind this tbh atleast it's not going to be a 24 man cluster like pubs right now.

[quote=Tob]..........[/quote]

This idea isn't too bad either just need to give me a reason to grind like hats and weapons drops would be pretty nice and I dont like using dx90 either since I dont want to be doing like 30fps.
34
#34
-2 Frags +

Soldier nerfs

Soldier nerfs
35
#35
4 Frags +
sageStep 1: Expect nothing
Step 2: Expect them to fix the most obvious problems of the stuff they introduce in the update
Step 3: wait 12 months
Step 4: repeat

on a sidenote i think HL replacing casual would be pretty fun, at least someone else could take sniper so the cheaters cant use it.

what if the cheater takes sniper

[quote=sage]Step 1: Expect nothing
Step 2: Expect them to fix the most obvious problems of the stuff they introduce in the update
Step 3: wait 12 months
Step 4: repeat

on a sidenote i think HL replacing casual would be pretty fun, at least someone else could take sniper so the cheaters cant use it.[/quote]

what if the cheater takes sniper
36
#36
1 Frags +
sopssage-
what if the cheater takes sniper

or ambassador spy
or scout
also pubbers wouldn't know how to outplay a projectile aimbot so soldier, demo, etc are also still options for the cheaters

The HL casual idea is not a good one if you'd do it just to battle cheaters
And if you'd do it for the fun of it: Keep in mind pubbers are more braindead than most tf2center players and HL lobbies are still terrible. Imagine playing it with even worse players

[quote=sops][quote=sage]-[/quote]

what if the cheater takes sniper[/quote]
or ambassador spy
or scout
also pubbers wouldn't know how to outplay a projectile aimbot so soldier, demo, etc are also still options for the cheaters

The HL casual idea is not a good one if you'd do it just to battle cheaters
And if you'd do it for the fun of it: Keep in mind pubbers are more braindead than most tf2center players and HL lobbies are still terrible. Imagine playing it with even worse players
37
#37
6 Frags +
sageon a sidenote i think HL replacing casual would be pretty fun, at least someone else could take sniper so the cheaters cant use it.

absolutely not, there's far better ways of stopping cheaters (such as voteban/kick). please dont make casual even worse by making it so you cant play the class you want to

[quote=sage]on a sidenote i think HL replacing casual would be pretty fun, at least someone else could take sniper so the cheaters cant use it.[/quote]

absolutely not, there's far better ways of stopping cheaters (such as voteban/kick). please dont make casual even worse by making it so you cant play the class you want to
38
#38
0 Frags +

HL as a non-main gamemode option in Casual could be pretty interesting tbh. But getting matches to start would probably be a nightmare, specially with people quitting.

HL as a non-main gamemode option in Casual could be pretty interesting tbh. But getting matches to start would probably be a nightmare, specially with people quitting.
39
#39
4 Frags +

.

.
40
#40
7 Frags +

All throughout the beta and whatnot, I was cautiously optimistic

But

I'm going to second the opinion of "There will be no changes to MM" or BASICALLY none. Certainly nothing huge like class limits, etc. It just makes zero sense. What would be the point of them doing that? I ask in earnest.

All throughout the beta and whatnot, I was cautiously optimistic

But

I'm going to second the opinion of "There will be no changes to MM" or BASICALLY none. Certainly nothing huge like class limits, etc. It just makes zero sense. What would be the point of them doing that? I ask in earnest.
41
#41
5 Frags +

Since valve's comp is completely dead anyways they wouldn't lose anything making it exactly like community 6s. With some proper matchmaking, it would be guaranteed to have a bunch of players.

Since valve's comp is completely dead anyways they wouldn't lose anything making it exactly like community 6s. With some proper matchmaking, it would be guaranteed to have a bunch of players.
42
#42
7 Frags +
samifaceam i the only one that feels like valve ignoring the existence of our competitive game mode is just a touch passive aggressive? i feel like they're just going to wait until average player stats plummet before they support it and then be like "see guys no one wanted this lolol"

Didn't they already do that by waiting till like 2 years after player numbers started dropping to release it then ignoring any feedback during the beta?

[quote=samiface]am i the only one that feels like valve ignoring the existence of our competitive game mode is just a touch passive aggressive? i feel like they're just going to wait until average player stats plummet before they support it and then be like "see guys no one wanted this lolol"[/quote]

Didn't they already do that by waiting till like 2 years after player numbers started dropping to release it then ignoring any feedback during the beta?
43
#43
7 Frags +

.

.
44
#44
3 Frags +

there is no way valve implements a HL matchmaking system, it would take literal ages to find 2 players that signed up for each class. i would not be shocked in the slightest if valve didn't do anything to the MM system, and put in garbage maps for 6s like cp_steel or borneo or even 2fort. don't think that the pyro update is going to make matchmaking tolerable, it'll probably just be "new maps for mm!!" and a few balance changes that MIGHT impact actual 6s.

there is no way valve implements a HL matchmaking system, it would take literal ages to find 2 players that signed up for each class. i would not be shocked in the slightest if valve didn't do anything to the MM system, and put in garbage maps for 6s like cp_steel or borneo or even 2fort. don't think that the pyro update is going to make matchmaking tolerable, it'll probably just be "new maps for mm!!" and a few balance changes that MIGHT impact actual 6s.
1 2
Please sign in through STEAM to post a comment.