prsnclimate change
I have good news
scrab
| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561198026442915 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:66177187] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:33088593 |
| Country | United States |
| Signed Up | November 4, 2012 |
| Last Posted | September 2, 2019 at 3:38 PM |
| Posts | 130 (0.1 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | |
| Windows Sensitivity | |
| Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
|
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | |
| Keyboard | |
| Mousepad | |
| Headphones | |
| Monitor | |
#90
1 of the koch brothers died
in
World Events
So I take it no one has an IQ even approaching mine? Makes sense, video game players are of lower intelligence than the general populace, and Team Fortress 2 players are lower still. Only brainlets would trust climatologists to know anything about climate projections, in the same way that only brainlets listen to economic predictions from economists.
Another internet debate won with ease.
posted 1 month ago
#78
1 of the koch brothers died
in
World Events
fireindaarcade
It's weird how your graph is limited to only the last 800,000 years, despite the Earth being billions of years old. It also says CO2 levels were rising rapidly thousands of years before modern technology was even invented. Nice self own.
I do resent being called an idiot by a few of you though; I'm probably the smartest person in this entire thread.
https://i.imgur.com/pJWAl0c.jpg
140 IQ. Read it and weep. One. Hundred. And. Forty. I already know what you're thinking. You're thinking "b-but it's only an online IQ test, it doesn't mean anything", aren't you? That's just cope. You're shying away from the truth - you know you can't do better than me. You wouldn't even get close.
Anyone who replies to me with a proven IQ lower than 130 will be ignored from now on, you're simply not worth my time.
posted 1 month ago
#70
1 of the koch brothers died
in
World Events
Rebitedon't argue with climate change deniers, they aren't worth the energy. Let's focus back on the fact that a shitty billionare is dead.
I haven't once denied that climate change is happening. Also, this thread has gone from shitting on some dead rich guy to a well-reasoned, thoughtful, and rigorous scientific debate. I have not only greatly improved the quality of discourse in this thread, I have raised the bar for all future threads.
You're welcome.
posted 1 month ago
#61
1 of the koch brothers died
in
World Events
JarateKingWe've known every step of that process since the 1800s. John Tyndall discovered the concept of greenhouse gases in 1859. Svante Arrhenius calculated the impact it would have if atmospheric CO2 was doubled in 1896 (though it didn't factor in everything because climate science wasn't mature at that point, but it got the jist and observed the core concept). To my knowledge, no credible papers since then have suggested otherwise in either of these -- and they are simple enough concepts that if there was anything wrong about them, it wouldn't have taken us over a century to find out if they were actually false somehow (hint: they're true).
That said, we did manage to further support them beyond any doubt:
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.475774
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/la09300d.html
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/sc05400j.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2141868/
along with four-digits worth of other papers agreeing with the same
To support all of the above, we have papers meta-analyzing that 97% of climate scientists & papers agree with man-made (or anthropogenic) climate change:
https://www.pnas.org/content/107/27/12107.abstract
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094025
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024/metaAmong abstracts expressing a position on [anthropogenic global warming], 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.(for those who aren't knowledgeable about the science community, 97% is really fucking good and may as well be considered scientific fact).
tldr: man-made climate change is absolutely supported by the scientific community, and there is far beyond enough research and evidence to take action on it
Not one of those studies you cited proves that humanity has contributed any significant amount to climate change. CO2 levels and global temperatures were constantly changing well before modern man even existed. Since climate scientists draw conclusions that vary so wildly regarding the extent to which human emissions have affected the climate, an impartial observer might say that climatology is just a pseudoscience and none of them really know what they're talking about. You may as well claim that 97% of strippers endorse the man-made climate change theory and it would carry the exact same weight.
posted 1 month ago
#56
1 of the koch brothers died
in
World Events
CollaideAhaha hilarious jokes my dude I like the part u said there's no evidence climate change is man made, that was really funny.
Are you ok? Lol
JarateKingMan-made climate change isn't even just a hard scientific fact, it's trivially true. We know the amount that certain gasses contribute to a greenhouse effect -- this is an experiment you can do in your backyard with a little effort. We know the rough amount we've been pumping into the atmosphere, double-checked by measuring the composition of the atmosphere. Do some basic multiplication and you see that there is an increase in average temperature. And what do ya know, we've also noticed that exact same increase as our greenhouse gas levels increased.
Hmm when you put it like that it does seem very simple. You can't cite a single piece of research that backs up any of that though, because it doesn't exist.
posted 1 month ago
#50
1 of the koch brothers died
in
World Events
CollaideAhjahaha so funny me likey
I wasn't trying to be funny, sir. I read a little about him and it seems he just made a lot of money and used it to promote his personal beliefs, something that I'm sure you would do if you could afford lobbyists and think tanks. Given that there's still no empirical evidence that climate change is man made, it's not like he was some kook maliciously denying hard scientific facts or anything. So yeah, I'm thinking he's based.
posted 1 month ago
#43
1 of the koch brothers died
in
World Events
Sounds like this guy was pretty based
posted 1 month ago
#32
Jeffrey Epstein
in
World Events
Just LMAO if you think he's really dead. He 100% had dead man's switches detailing everything so he couldn't be silenced by anyone he has dirt on, it's why they got him released the last time he was arrested. This time they swapped him for a body double and got him out. Wake the fuck up people
posted 2 months ago
#6
Family Mann
in
Off Topic
American men don't have foreskins, they ritualistically cut them off at birth to make anti-aging face creams for their benevolent Hollywood overlords.
posted 2 months ago
#14
Global Whitelist Data Gathering
in
TF2 General Discussion
Excuse me but this is the global whitelist, therefore NA do not get an opinion.
Winger is straight up broken, especially on mids like granary, process, and gullywash. I honestly don't think most people even realise how many useful winger jumps there are. It's really strange how everyone cries about scout class constantly yet nobody thinks "Hmmm maybe this unlock that lets him take the high ground whenever he wants has something to do with it."
Crossbow is broken too but will never, ever be banned because most m*dic mains are too braindead to even know what critheals are these days. Sad!
Mantreads are great for sacking into last on some maps, please unban
posted 5 months ago
#17
Ombrack
in
TF2 General Discussion
Casting seems really hard, I respect anyone who has the balls to try it. Even french 'people'
posted 6 months ago
#99
cyanic team fortress 2
in
TF2 General Discussion
Also where do you guys think this stacks up against that time Samski said Puoskari should have killed himself? Think we need some sort of ranking system
posted 7 months ago