This is definitely a cool concept. That said, I think the implementation can make a world of difference.

It would be great to have this implemented using a client-server architecture. Move the majority of the bot's functionality into a separate backend and give it a clean HTTP-based API. Then, you can allow various clients to connect to it, the most obvious of which would be the web-based point-and-click interface, as well as an IRC bot that simply utilises the aforementioned API. This would also allow for much more creative clients, if anybody chooses to create one, given that the API is open.

I think this is a much cleaner solution than the more obvious option of building a graphical interface as a layer on top of the IRC connection. Of course, this is easier said than done, as it creates a decent amount of additional work.

All this brainstorming aside, thank you for all of your work on this front. I'm sure atf2, even in its current state, has helped a lot of people uncomfortable with IRC.

No Linux support this time around. =/

I'm going to have to agree with wareya about atf2.org. It's just a qwebirc installation that auto-joins a few relevant channels. In fact, I'd consider it worse than traditional IRC clients, because connectivity issues become more of a nuisance with qwebirc.

Also, irssi master race.

Currently, the HTML structure for these blocks is:

<code>blah<br />
blah<br />
blah</code>

A solution would be: (of course, doing this in the style sheet is a better idea.)

<code style="white-space: pre;">blah
blah
blah</code>

Or, alternatively:

<code><pre>blah
blah
blah</pre></code>

Basically, anything to let the rendering engine know that the code is pre-formatted should leave the white space intact.

Of course, make sure to remove any line breaks nested between the code tags.

There were quite a few people on it earlier today.

QuickFire Rapid: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B007VDLVD4

Get this and some custom key caps to get rid of the branding.

Agreed. Forwarding tf2centre.com to tf2center.com should solve this.

I think this is a bad idea. However, my opinion here is mostly irrelevant because there is no decent way to implement this in the first place.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system

Audio-Technica ATH-AD900: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0006OQY2S

Amazing sound quality and incredibly comfortable. It's at a good price now, too.

I'd argue that these are the best headphones for under $300.

Good work.

What language is it written in, and is it open source?

I love you.

Maybe eventually. They are mostly the same with some minor change. (The _bottom ones have the side stats bar at the bottom, mostly for 4:3 and 5:4 users, and the 16v16 ones just extend the scoreboard down to make room for an extra four players on each side. The 6v6 one is pretty different in layout, but I'll probably modify it to fit in with the rest at some point.)

I released it in a half-complete state, so there are quite a few pages of changes/additions, bug reports, feature requests, etc..

Please elaborate.

I won't be adding it to the actual HUD. I'd help you add it, but I don't have access to TF2 right now. Maybe you can look at another HUD and see how they do it? It's probably done through the HudPlayerHealth.res file.

You must be doing something wrong. You'll need to post more information for me to be able to help you.