FreudCan't think of a good way of phrasing this, but I don't think you should be giving out advice based on justification this weak.
Since this is an Essentials.TF server, and someone with the Essentials.TF label said to use 132 update/cmdrate, I figured there was a good reason the server owners are saying to use that. I am also curious why they said to use 132 instead of 133.
FreudI'm not sure what your logic is here. If compression reduces the average packet size to X% of what it was originally, only X% of the original bandwidth will be used. This saving will apply regardless of the rate packets are being sent at.
If packets are being sent at a faster upload speed in bytes per second, the benefits of compression in terms of speed diminish. Also, the load from compression increases the more packets you're sending.
ArieThe point is reduced transmission times and fitting all packets within sv_maxrate, it's a trade-off.
The rate settings are increased anyway, so fitting packets into the rate isn't really an issue.
ArieThe time you lose (<0.02ms) to compress a packet is gained by having to spend less time transmitting it (because it's now smaller).
With a higher rate setting, bytes are being sent faster and thus the transmission time you save from compression is less.
ArieI'd stick with the defaults (both client and server) over lists of TF2 client and server cvars with no data/benchmarks.
The defaults aren't designed for this higher cmd/update rate. It is more optimal to change them. Though, I agree that some of the more controversial settings might be best to discuss later since this thread is mainly about tickrate rather than net settings.