hamaham
Account Details
SteamID64 76561198051497921
SteamID3 [U:1:91232193]
SteamID32 STEAM_0:1:45616096
Country Sweden
Signed Up June 15, 2016
Last Posted April 16, 2024 at 8:17 AM
Posts 1046 (0.4 per day)
Game Settings
In-game Sensitivity 2
Windows Sensitivity 6
Raw Input  
DPI
800
Resolution
640x480
Refresh Rate
160hz
Hardware Peripherals
Mouse steelseries ikari
Keyboard DELL AT102W
Mousepad  
Headphones  
Monitor SyncMaster 957MB
1 ⋅⋅ 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ⋅⋅ 69
#2 [AU/NZ] The Palaise Limitless 6v6 Tournament! in Projects

guys... april fools was 2 days ago lol

posted about 5 years ago
#6 Team High School II Dating Sim in Projects

won't lie kinda wanna marry froyo-chan

posted about 5 years ago
#8581 stream highlights in Videos

not tf2 but i saw this today and it was so beautiful i almost shed a tear
never have i wanted to maincall and use this call when dealing massive damage as much as i have after i saw this simple clip
https://clips.twitch.tv/RockyScaryAubergineFreakinStinkin

posted about 5 years ago
#11 What happens after you die in The Dumpster

tf2 gets a major without removing "restrictions"

posted about 5 years ago
#70 Which type are you? in Off Topic

grass fire normal flying rock ground electric fighting psychic ghost ice dragon shadow
either one of these 2

https://i.imgur.com/VvUFKcL.png

posted about 5 years ago
#37 ETF2L admin credibility in TF2 General Discussion
AoshiThe fact that you're defending it in this manner really makes it seem like "We would only get a minor warning so we broke the rules to get to playoffs". Which is the overall feeling we got from this case as a whole.

I can understand now why you get that feeling but if that decision is based on what we typed in game it's taking our words way out of context, we believed you could play with someone 2 divs above, when they then say "Swi can't play scout since he played prem" we, at least I, took that as a "Swi isn't allowed to play because he was in prem" (which is why I in all caps also write about it being 2/2 points, I was wrong in this case about the rule but it wasn't like we planned to get carried and we would rather have played with mid medic mercs, but they got denied.) we were still very focused on the fact that they told us in steam chat that "we're denying all your mercs because you didn't wanna reschedule" (mind you that no default date was set and we agreed to play on one of their days that they had offered us to choose from)
the "try to default" comment was a passive aggressive thing I said since I consider forcing a team to play 5v6 is default hunting.

I didn't think we'd be getting a warning in the first place but later on when I reread the rule realized that it would've been a minor warning, at this point I had already agreed to switch to scout.
The point still stands though that they continued playing when given the option to restart if they felt it was unfair.

Show Content
RED NeuTronas AdminaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAdmin's response:
RED NeuTronas Right after some discussion we've come to the conclusion that restarting the game without swi will make for a much more fair ga
RED NeuTronas me
RED shpee (gone wild) !lg
BLU hamaham - formerly scout kk
RED foz merc so can u play without swi from now on then?
posted about 5 years ago
#29 ETF2L admin credibility in TF2 General Discussion
FireThe main question to me is, since you already played until the tie with Swi on scout even tho it was breaking the rules, would that alone not already justify a default loss for that map?

No, experienced players only give minor warnings. We had no warnings prior and wouldn't be impacted by one, there was no indication that it would be defaulted since I have never seen it happen before, and I've been around since 2014.

FireWould you even have the choice to say "oh they noticed it was not allowed, guess we just replay and see what happens"?
Because if that is not the case, then you were indeed misinformed, but it had no influence on the outcome of the match. You already played most of the map and the way you played it was not following the rules, thus you get the default loss for that map unless the opponents want to replay (which they apparently didnt).

This legit doesn't make sense since teams that have won with higher experienced players in other matches have ONLY gotten minor warnings, never did the losing team get default wins or options to replay.

posted about 5 years ago
#26 ETF2L admin credibility in TF2 General Discussion
FiredaybraekIf LR had any doubt that he was able to play they should have double checked it. It seems like Surstromming genuinely thought he could play, so if no team bothers to check or bring it up to the admins. If they were aware beforehand as they seem to be, they should not have readied up and instead should have contacted an admin to confirm that.Meh i dont think you should really blame the opponents for the other team breaking a rule.
Each team is responsible for knowing the rules and their roster themselves, and LR even told them that what they do is against the rules. At least at this point imo LR did everything they should have, and Surstromming are the ones who should have doublechecked if they made a mistake in understanding the rules.
To me this clearly shows they were not hunting the default win, as they explicitely told the other team that what they were doing is wrong (given that it was before the game started or in a reasonable timeframe during the beginning of it), but it is not their responsibility to make sure that another team wont get punished for breaking the rules and put effort into getting an admin.
If you dont bother getting an admin and in the end it turns out you were on the wrong side then its your own fault.

The situation isn't "which team was more in the wrong" but rather that admins are unreliable and inconsistent.

LR are aware that Swi is going to play scout, never at any point during the game do they talk to admins or want to pause, they manage to even the scores and force a golden cap.
They contact admins and get told that "Restarting the map with Swi on med would be more fair, unless you don't feel the need to."
I contact admin and ask about the rule and ask if we will get a minor warning if we just continue playing with Swi on scout, I get the response "No, it'll be a default, I can allow Swi to play medic for the rest of the game but that's it"
LR switch to golden cap config and I switch to scout and Swi goes medic, we both ready up. This means that they did not feel a need to restart the game.
We switch to snakewater and we manage to win that map as well, giving us 5 points and them 1, we had 21 and they had 24 before this match, making it so we get into playoffs instead of them.
They complain to admins and manage to get granary defaulted, making them get into playoffs.

Had we known that we would get defaulted regardless of me going scout in golden cap we would have obviously picked to restart, but the decision was theirs to make and they did not feel the need to restart.

The excuse that it was a playoffs deciding match should not matter for any game in the top tables as all the games are fixed. They all matter equally towards getting into playoffs.

posted about 5 years ago
#17 ETF2L admin credibility in TF2 General Discussion
TimTumGazI get it though.The rulebook needs some (meaningful) adjustments asap. LR knew the other team is breaking the rules by having Swi on scout but chose to wait until after the game and I know exactly what was going on in their mumble: "if we beat them it's fine but if we lose we can just get the default". If people accept to play the entire match after the first mid this rule just shouldn't apply anymore. They knew exactly what they were getting into and they did nothing to prevent it even though they could have.
It's not the responsibility of LR to check if everyone on Surstromming's roster is allowed to play. They even warned them as far as I can see while they could've said nothing at all. Surstromming should've checked with the admins, but instead they responded with 'unlucky, he can', 'we can play with him :)' and 'unlucky :))'

If admins hadn't decided on the spot to judge the game differently we'd have gotten a minor warning and that's it. No point penalty. Yeah it might be a dick move to willingly get a minor warning to secure playoffs but so is denying all mercs.

They contacted admins AFTER the map as well, they got permission to replay map or play golden cap and later on after both maps had been played got permission to take default apparently? Why didn't they just force us to replay the map? All admins told me was to play scout or get defaulted

posted about 5 years ago
#12 ETF2L admin credibility in TF2 General Discussion

The merc rules needs a change when it comes to 6s as there is nothing preventing people from denying all mercs, not even their social status as everyone can blame someone else who was on the team at the time and people won't bother more than that. ETF2L isn't big enough to warrant every team having substitute players and being forced to play 5v6 is super lame.

As for the official I find it a bit annoying that they were given an option to restart the granary map when we tied and had to play golden cap, I was told to play scout at this point which I did and we won. Only then do they take a default win. We were never given the option to replay the map.

posted about 5 years ago
#8 ETF2L admin credibility in TF2 General Discussion
GazI mean Swi gave everyone on the other team the McDickin' on scout
Although the rematch is a pretty good idea to fix this clusterfuck imo

It's very possible to do a rematch if it's done before Wednesday 21:15 as that is when Team Lithuanian Rhapsody have their first round of playoffs against Team goonsquad.
Alternatively it can be done any time during the week if that official gets rescheduled to a later date, might be an issue for Team Lithuanian Rhapsody considering the times they offered us that we could choose from due to their team having highlander players who are equally as dedicated to highlander as they are to 6s.

ZestyDoes the 2 point limit rule cited in the comments of that match page mean that you can't have >2 points or ≥2 points? Assuming its the former?

The rule is worded strangely in my opinion, I'm no linguistic professor but limit being 2 sounds like you have up to 2 points to me at least, but in this case means you in fact only have 1 point.

posted about 5 years ago
#58 Mass shooting at Christchurch, New Zealand in World Events
Seinfeldhamahamseen some twitter folks say "don't talk about it, he just wants fame and glory and doesn't deserve it" and while yeah that's why some folks tend to go out by shooting shit up, when it's politically driven like this one it's pretty important to remember shit some ideologies can make you believe and even go as far as to act on it
it's like saying "forget about the holocaust, nazis only wanted attention"

discussing the tragedy and making sure those affected are remembered is important, and it's equally important we make sure this never happens again, but my post was in direct reference to mustard overlord posting an image of his 4chan posts which contained links to his crackhead manifestos, which should not be read by anyone ever

i was talking about people who posted it on twitter, i saw h3h3 and ben shapiro do it

posted about 5 years ago
#2 Old version of cp_snakewater_final1 in TF2 General Discussion

http://comp.tf/wiki/Snakewater

posted about 5 years ago
#18 Mass shooting at Christchurch, New Zealand in World Events

seen some twitter folks say "don't talk about it, he just wants fame and glory and doesn't deserve it" and while yeah that's why some folks tend to go out by shooting shit up, when it's politically driven like this one it's pretty important to remember shit some ideologies can make you believe and even go as far as to act on it
it's like saying "forget about the holocaust, nazis only wanted attention"

posted about 5 years ago
#174 RGL 6s league in TF2 General Discussion
https://i.imgur.com/miRCTKB.png

to understand this image you must first understand the history of sigafoo

posted about 5 years ago
1 ⋅⋅ 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ⋅⋅ 69