koeitje's Profile

Account Details
SteamID64	76561197978836687
SteamID3	[U:1:18570959]
SteamID32	STEAM_0:1:9285479
Country	Netherlands
Signed Up	July 18, 2012
Last Posted	October 6, 2013 at 9:23 AM
Posts	118 (0 per day)

Game Settings
In-game Sensitivity
Windows Sensitivity
Raw Input
DPI
Resolution
Refresh Rate

Hardware Peripherals
Mouse
Keyboard
Mousepad
Headphones
Monitor

#68 9-11 Remembrance in Off Topic

mthsadKoeitjeHallowpretty sure japan (geographically) was untouched by ww2 at the time of the bombings. the fact that japan had troops in china/the pacific doesn't change anything for the civilians in the cities.Nuking military targets wouldn't have had enough of an impact. I guess Al-Qaeda went by the same logic.read in a news article a long time ago that they avoided military and nuclear targets because they didn't want things to get out of hand
the hijackers flying the planes were actually left up to the choice of what they wanted to attack

Avoiding nuclear targets I understand, but military? They already bombed several US military targets prior to 9/11?

posted about 10 years ago

#66 9-11 Remembrance in Off Topic

Hallowpretty sure japan (geographically) was untouched by ww2 at the time of the bombings. the fact that japan had troops in china/the pacific doesn't change anything for the civilians in the cities.

Nuking military targets wouldn't have had enough of an impact. I guess Al-Qaeda went by the same logic.

posted about 10 years ago

#63 9-11 Remembrance in Off Topic

wonderlandKoeitjeTwinqeKoeitjeAll I say is that a nation that had no qualms about wiping two cities off the face of the earth shouldn't be so strung up about losing close to 3000 civilians during a time of war.
The U.S. was not considered at war when 9/11 occurred.Al-Qaeda (and other Jihadist groups) is always at war against the enemies of Islam. Just because the United States didn't recognize this until after 9/11 it does not make it any less of a war prior to 9/11.
lol. of course it was less of a war prior to 9/11 and prior to the US declaring war. they were attacked during peace time and your argument is trash.

it doesn't matter if Al-Qaeda considered it a war because were talking about how the US feels about being attacked so it only matters if the US thought they were at war, which they didn't.

I guess you forgot about the 1998 US embassy bombings? (and the US response where they made short work of some nice civilian targets)

posted about 10 years ago

#60 9-11 Remembrance in Off Topic

TwinqeKoeitjeAll I say is that a nation that had no qualms about wiping two cities off the face of the earth shouldn't be so strung up about losing close to 3000 civilians during a time of war.
The U.S. was not considered at war when 9/11 occurred.

Al-Qaeda (and other Jihadist groups) is always at war against the enemies of Islam. Just because the United States didn't recognize this until after 9/11 it does not make it any less of a war prior to 9/11.

posted about 10 years ago

#54 9-11 Remembrance in Off Topic

All I say is that a nation that had no qualms about wiping two cities off the face of the earth shouldn't be so strung up about losing close to 3000 civilians during a time of war.

posted about 10 years ago

#52 9-11 Remembrance in Off Topic

kuzaKoeitjeA. That was in Japan. I understand that deploying weapons of mass destruction on civilians is not something to be proud of, but still.
B. Not here on the forums.
That was just one of the many search results. There were many candle light vigils in the US for this. SO again, do some research before you make an argument because you just look more stupid every time you post.

posted about 10 years ago

#50 9-11 Remembrance in Off Topic

kuzaKoeitjeI MUST HAVE MISSED THE HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI REMEMBERENCE?mage24365I know I'm going to sound like a dick for saying this, but seriously: No other country cares this much about a terrorist attack 12 years after it occurred. We don't need to forget that it happened. We do need to move on. We sound like that crazy bitch who's still crying over a breakup 12 years later. Yes, the events were tragic. But events like these happen more often or more devastatingly all the time in other countries. Did you see people reading off the names of those lost in, say, Hiroshima 12 years later? Because, quite frankly, that's pretty similar except 36-66 times as many people died.
My point is, we need to move on. Not forget, but move on. My condolences to anyone who lost a loved one in the attack. I do feel sorry.
It would be great if some of you guys making arguments did some research before you opened your stupid mouths.

A simple Google search and I find that many groups and countries are having a 68th anniversary remembrance of Hiroshima this year.

http://www.voanews.com/content/japan-marks-68th-anniversary-of-hiroshima-nuclear-bombing/1724114.html

A. That was in Japan. I understand that deploying weapons of mass destruction on civilians is not something to be proud of, but still.
B. Not here on the forums.

posted about 10 years ago

#45 9-11 Remembrance in Off Topic

I MUST HAVE MISSED THE HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI REMEMBERENCE?

posted about 10 years ago

#43 The Mouse/Mousepad Thread (last updated Sep. 9, 2013) in Hardware

AlykaKoeitjeAlykaare there any mouse that has 400 dpi that cant be change except for wmo or intellimouseWhy must it be unchangeable?yes like wmo but other brand

That is not an answer to my question.

posted about 10 years ago

#38 The Mouse/Mousepad Thread (last updated Sep. 9, 2013) in Hardware

Alykaare there any mouse that has 400 dpi that cant be change except for wmo or intellimouse

Why must it be unchangeable?

posted about 10 years ago

#33 The Mouse/Mousepad Thread (last updated Sep. 9, 2013) in Hardware

povohatI feel where you are coming from Koeitje. It appears as though the OP is a list of all the mice that people use, regardless of whether they are actually good or not. I personally would not recommend a lot of the mice listed because of their objective flaws.

Having said that, Sheep uses a g9x (adns-9500) and it appears as though he isn't struggling that much with the inconsistent nature of its tracking.

Just imagine what he could do with a mouse that actually tracks his hand perfectly.

posted about 10 years ago

#28 The Mouse/Mousepad Thread (last updated Sep. 9, 2013) in Hardware

tranchemusicComangliaAlso
Why are you adding Laser mice? They're awful compared to optical.
That's pretty well negligible. If your laser mouse is awful, it's because that particular sensor is bad and not the technology in general. I've never had an issue with mine misreading or cutting off or anything, on any surface.

EDIT: To clarify, laser and optical are essentially the exact same technology. One of them generates EMR through an LED, the other does through a laser. They both read them in the same way.

I like my Steelseries mouse because it's sturdy and comfortable as fuck (rubberized Sensei raw). The accel is barely noticeable, you can still build muscle memory for it just as easily as anything else. It's a lot less of an issue than the angle snapping my logitechs have had.

There is not a single good laser mouse out there. You can't get used to the acceleration on ADNS-9500/9800 mice because it's not linear but more like a sinus wave.

Special image for all the minus fraggers

http://cdn.overclock.net/3/3a/350x700px-LL-3a123337_belsqdbh6ng4hh0nr.gif

posted about 10 years ago

#22 The Mouse/Mousepad Thread (last updated Sep. 9, 2013) in Hardware

TooniKoeitjeOh, so we are just adding shitty mice to the list for the sake of it or what? If you actually want to make a list at least try and make it a proper list and remove all the laser mice (+the Kana). Also remove the DPI while you are at it, you might as well add the colour of the mouse feet to the list because that says as much about the performance as the DPI.
kana is ok as long as you don't set the dpi above 800, i agree with you on everything else tho

Either way you are better off just waiting for the Kana V2 considering that will have the ADNS-3090

posted about 10 years ago

#15 The Mouse/Mousepad Thread (last updated Sep. 9, 2013) in Hardware

People actually minus frag me for truthbombing. Ok.

posted about 10 years ago

#13 The Mouse/Mousepad Thread (last updated Sep. 9, 2013) in Hardware

Oh, so we are just adding shitty mice to the list for the sake of it or what? If you actually want to make a list at least try and make it a proper list and remove all the laser mice (+the Kana). Also remove the DPI while you are at it, you might as well add the colour of the mouse feet to the list because that says as much about the performance as the DPI.

posted about 10 years ago