No one is going to ban him calm down. It was just a bad joke because he said some really stupid things to people in pug.na last night. Anyone that actually thought he was going to get banned from a petition is pretty silly.
HardcoreMake a rule saying don't be a dick, and then let everyone make complaints against everyone else because literally nothing bad can happen over a precedent of banning someone you don't like. Totally. Great idea.
See, again, you're missing the point.
This isn't one person disliking another, this is a case where the very, very large majority of players are lodging a complaint. Besides, like I said, it's not actually what's going on here. My point was merely hypothetical.
See, again, you're missing the point.
This isn't one person disliking another, this is a case where the very, very large majority of players are lodging a complaint. Besides, like I said, it's not actually what's going on here. My point was merely hypothetical.
synchroHardcoreMake a rule saying don't be a dick, and then let everyone make complaints against everyone else because literally nothing bad can happen over a precedent of banning someone you don't like. Totally. Great idea.See, again, you're missing the point.
This isn't one person disliking another, this is a case where the very, very large majority of players are lodging a complaint.
The fact that there's a discussion about this at all shows that someone gives a shit, and the fact that there are people in the thread who don't want him banned means some people, regardless of how they think of him, don't want or do not think he deserves to be banned. Banning people for being shitlords or shitters is unfair, especially when (from what I've read in the thread) all they've done is shittalk and be really fucking annoying. Obviously, muting isn't really an option, but you could just not pick him, or tell him to fuck off. If he won't listen, he probably has autism and you should be more understanding and then tell him to fuck off again.
But I'm just some subopen4lyfe shitter, I've never actually played with him.
See, again, you're missing the point.
This isn't one person disliking another, this is a case where the very, very large majority of players are lodging a complaint.[/quote] The fact that there's a discussion about this at all shows that someone gives a shit, and the fact that there are people in the thread who don't want him banned means some people, regardless of how they think of him, don't want or do not think he deserves to be banned. Banning people for being shitlords or shitters is unfair, especially when (from what I've read in the thread) all they've done is shittalk and be really fucking annoying. Obviously, muting isn't really an option, but you could just not pick him, or tell him to fuck off. If he won't listen, he probably has autism and you should be more understanding and then tell him to fuck off again.
But I'm just some subopen4lyfe shitter, I've never actually played with him.
a petition with his picture and comments like
Adolf Hitler BERLIN, CA about 22 hours ago Liked 0
HE IS WORSE THAN ZE JEWS!!
if you take this remotely serious you're way too gullible, and people are so fucking sensitive now. when did everyone's balls just shrivel up? say something back, don't hide behind 13 alt accounts and cry like a 12yearold
[quote]Adolf Hitler BERLIN, CA about 22 hours ago Liked 0
HE IS WORSE THAN ZE JEWS!![/quote]
if you take this remotely serious you're way too gullible, and people are so fucking sensitive now. when did everyone's balls just shrivel up? say something back, don't hide behind 13 alt accounts and cry like a 12yearold
This thread should have ended with my post. Thanks for coming out everyone have a good night!
synchroI'm pretty sure "nobody gets along/enjoys playing with him" is exactly the right reason to not let somebody participate in a community-run system.
Not saying that's the case here, but seriously, how can you honestly say that 90% of the players not enjoying their PUGs with someone isn't a good reason to ban them from said pugs?
then don't pick him
Not saying that's the case here, but seriously, how can you honestly say that 90% of the players not enjoying their PUGs with someone isn't a good reason to ban them from said pugs?[/quote]
then don't pick him
This was just a ploy to get Bl4nk shirtless on stream and potentially wasted. Mission accomplished, sorry a few nerds got butt hurt along the way.
Thanks to all the viewers who helped us push the 50 signs to get the skin showing and thanks to the 10 who didnt sign so we didnt have a shitfaced Bl4nk after 2 shots. (disgraceful)
Thanks to all the viewers who helped us push the 50 signs to get the skin showing and thanks to the 10 who didnt sign so we didnt have a shitfaced Bl4nk after 2 shots. (disgraceful)
I think this is blown a little out of proportion. It is simple enough that if you don't want him to play then don't pick him.
Nobody wants to deal with him. It's not hard to understand.
YouMustMikeNo one is going to ban him calm down. It was just a bad joke because he said some really stupid things to people in pug.na last night. Anyone that actually thought he was going to get banned from a petition is pretty silly.
He would have if everyone would've jumped on the bandwagon. Don't kid yourself. People are fucking assholes if you let them be.
At least you guys are trying to save face. Something I've seen Dflame do all the time.
He would have if everyone would've jumped on the bandwagon. Don't kid yourself. People are fucking assholes if you let them be.
At least you guys are trying to save face. Something I've seen Dflame do all the time.