Can't wait to try out the new stuff in the ping section!
Upvote
Upvoted
29
Downvote
Downvoted
FPS Improvement Compilation
posted in
Customization
DO NOT. I REPEAT. DO NOT. TAKE THIS IDIOTS ADVICE ON NETWORKING. HE IS A FOOL AND HIS "DNS" IS JUST AN ANOTHER WAY FOR HIM TO SPY ON US. REPORT THIS GUIDE AND GET THIS SICKO BANNED OFF STEAM.
DO NOT. I REPEAT. DO NOT. TAKE THIS IDIOTS ADVICE ON NETWORKING. HE IS A FOOL AND HIS "DNS" IS JUST AN ANOTHER WAY FOR HIM TO SPY ON US. REPORT THIS GUIDE AND GET THIS SICKO BANNED OFF STEAM.
Organized the guide, rewrited some sections, added pictures and another ping fix.
hf
Organized the guide, rewrited some sections, added pictures and another ping fix.
hf
hf
HatimHow come 16:9 resolutions eat more FPS than 16:10 then ? considering the width times height is way more ?
Look at the actual numbers you posted...
1920 x 1080 > 1680 x 1050
[quote=Hatim]How come 16:9 resolutions eat more FPS than 16:10 then ? considering the width times height is way more ?[/quote]
Look at the actual numbers you posted...
1920 x 1080 > 1680 x 1050
Look at the actual numbers you posted...
1920 x 1080 > 1680 x 1050
MedusaHatimHow come 16:9 resolutions eat more FPS than 16:10 then ? considering the width times height is way more ?Look at the actual numbers you posted...
1920 x 1080 > 1680 x 1050
1680 px x 1050 px (16:10 ratio) > 1280 px x 720 px (16:9 ratio)
2073600 pixels > 1764000 pixels **difference of 309600 pixels**
1680 x 1050 = 226.65 fps
1280 x 720 = 223.18 fps **Difference of approx. 3 fps**
1920 px x 1080 px (16:9 ratio) > 1280 px x 720 px (16:9 ratio)
2073600 pixels > 921600 pixels **difference of 1152000 pixels**
1280 x 720 = 223.18 fps
1920 x 1080 = 222.84 fps **Difference of approx. 1 fps**
Conclusion my snarky friend ? :)
[quote=Medusa][quote=Hatim]How come 16:9 resolutions eat more FPS than 16:10 then ? considering the width times height is way more ?[/quote]
Look at the actual numbers you posted...
1920 x 1080 > 1680 x 1050[/quote]
[b]1680 px x 1050 px (16:10 ratio) > 1280 px x 720 px (16:9 ratio) [/b]
2073600 pixels > 1764000 pixels **difference of 309600 pixels**
1680 x 1050 = 226.65 fps
1280 x 720 = 223.18 fps [b]**Difference of approx. 3 fps**[/b]
[b]1920 px x 1080 px (16:9 ratio) > 1280 px x 720 px (16:9 ratio) [/b]
2073600 pixels > 921600 pixels **difference of 1152000 pixels**
1280 x 720 = 223.18 fps
1920 x 1080 = 222.84 fps [b]**Difference of approx. 1 fps**[/b]
Conclusion my snarky friend ? :)
Look at the actual numbers you posted...
1920 x 1080 > 1680 x 1050[/quote]
[b]1680 px x 1050 px (16:10 ratio) > 1280 px x 720 px (16:9 ratio) [/b]
2073600 pixels > 1764000 pixels **difference of 309600 pixels**
1680 x 1050 = 226.65 fps
1280 x 720 = 223.18 fps [b]**Difference of approx. 3 fps**[/b]
[b]1920 px x 1080 px (16:9 ratio) > 1280 px x 720 px (16:9 ratio) [/b]
2073600 pixels > 921600 pixels **difference of 1152000 pixels**
1280 x 720 = 223.18 fps
1920 x 1080 = 222.84 fps [b]**Difference of approx. 1 fps**[/b]
Conclusion my snarky friend ? :)
Frozystep 1, install comanglias config
step 2, done
R4ndom's config gives about 10 fps more, but only if you have a compatible rig.
[quote=Frozy]step 1, install comanglias config
step 2, done[/quote]
R4ndom's config gives about 10 fps more, but only if you have a compatible rig.
step 2, done[/quote]
R4ndom's config gives about 10 fps more, but only if you have a compatible rig.
HatimHow come 16:9 resolutions eat more FPS than 16:10 then ? considering the width times height is way more ?ComangliaBenchmarks for Aspect Ratios
4:3
1280 x 1024640 x 4802639 frames 11.506 seconds 229.35 fps ( 4.36 ms/f) 11.492 fps variability2639 frames 11.525 seconds 228.98 fps ( 4.37 ms/f) 11.855 fps variability
16:10
1680 x 10502639 frames 11.643 seconds 226.65 fps ( 4.41 ms/f) 11.369 fps variability
16:9
1920 x 10801280 x 7202639 frames 11.843 seconds 222.84 fps ( 4.49 ms/f) 11.428 fps variability2639 frames 11.825 seconds 223.18 fps ( 4.48 ms/f) 12.324 fps variability
You are comparing a difference of, at most, 75 nanoseconds.
[quote=Hatim]
How come 16:9 resolutions eat more FPS than 16:10 then ? considering the width times height is way more ?
[quote=Comanglia]Benchmarks for Aspect Ratios
[b]4:3[/b]
[i]1280 x 1024[/i]
[code]2639 frames 11.506 seconds 229.35 fps ( 4.36 ms/f) 11.492 fps variability[/code]
[i]640 x 480[/i]
[code]2639 frames 11.525 seconds 228.98 fps ( 4.37 ms/f) 11.855 fps variability[/code]
[b]16:10[/b]
[i]1680 x 1050[/i]
[code]2639 frames 11.643 seconds 226.65 fps ( 4.41 ms/f) 11.369 fps variability[/code]
[b]16:9[/b]
[i]1920 x 1080[/i]
[code]2639 frames 11.843 seconds 222.84 fps ( 4.49 ms/f) 11.428 fps variability[/code]
[i]1280 x 720[/i]
[code]2639 frames 11.825 seconds 223.18 fps ( 4.48 ms/f) 12.324 fps variability[/code][/quote][/quote]
You are comparing a difference of, at most, 75 nanoseconds.
How come 16:9 resolutions eat more FPS than 16:10 then ? considering the width times height is way more ?
[quote=Comanglia]Benchmarks for Aspect Ratios
[b]4:3[/b]
[i]1280 x 1024[/i]
[code]2639 frames 11.506 seconds 229.35 fps ( 4.36 ms/f) 11.492 fps variability[/code]
[i]640 x 480[/i]
[code]2639 frames 11.525 seconds 228.98 fps ( 4.37 ms/f) 11.855 fps variability[/code]
[b]16:10[/b]
[i]1680 x 1050[/i]
[code]2639 frames 11.643 seconds 226.65 fps ( 4.41 ms/f) 11.369 fps variability[/code]
[b]16:9[/b]
[i]1920 x 1080[/i]
[code]2639 frames 11.843 seconds 222.84 fps ( 4.49 ms/f) 11.428 fps variability[/code]
[i]1280 x 720[/i]
[code]2639 frames 11.825 seconds 223.18 fps ( 4.48 ms/f) 12.324 fps variability[/code][/quote][/quote]
You are comparing a difference of, at most, 75 nanoseconds.
hey guys he updated it
+ benchmark section
+ r4ndom cfg
hey guys he updated it
+ benchmark section
+ r4ndom cfg
+ benchmark section
+ r4ndom cfg
^ Thanks dawg.
Updated as of 13/11/2015:
+TimerResolution
+Registry Tweaks
+System Restore and Hibernation Disable
Special thanks to Cloudy for his own compilation of TF2 tweaks.
^ Thanks dawg.
Updated as of 13/11/2015:
+TimerResolution
+Registry Tweaks
+System Restore and Hibernation Disable
Special thanks to Cloudy for his own compilation of TF2 tweaks.
Updated as of 13/11/2015:
+TimerResolution
+Registry Tweaks
+System Restore and Hibernation Disable
Special thanks to Cloudy for his own compilation of TF2 tweaks.
Please
sign in through STEAM
to post a comment.