Idk, personally I don't find "is X made using Y tools/methods" a very useful frame for determining how I think about X. You see this a lot in software where people will soyface over something because it is written in rust or something. What actually matters is if a tool is useful, the provenance is kind of irrelevant 99% of the time other than as trivia (like yes it is cool that roller coaster tycoon is hand rolled asm, but that doesn't make the game better or worse).
Over the decades, the skill floor of producing software has always decreased. Compiled languages, then garbage collected languages, then high level scripting languages etc, all make writing software much easier and lower barrier to entry. LLMs are another step on this path, decreasing friction even further, allowing more people who have less taste/intelligence/sprezzatura etc create software. Is that net good or bad? Probably good. Does it result in some slop on your feed? Absolutely. But end of the day you probably shouldn't let how some piece of software was created hold too much weight in your thought process.
At the end of the day, there has always been slop. Now there is much more slop, but also quite a few more genuinely interesting and useful projects that wouldn't otherwise exist. I think it's fine to rag on people a bit if what they are making is flat out dumb, but it's wasteful to sneer at something just because someone is using a dev tool that you don't like.