I've been using this for like three weeks now and the difference was huge for me and I don't think I'll go back to regular non-capped/non-vsynced fps. I don't know if it's because I have a pretty old monitor though, XL2411T from 2014, but the image is so much clearer with than without, it's night and day.

I've not really noticed any input lag at all, maybe just old people things, and even if it's there, the picture clarity is worth it for me over the tiny amount of possible reaction time I'm missing.

I'd suggest that any one tempted to try this, go for it, it doesn't take long at all to set up and it can be super worth if you like it.

GREENRAB IS MY FUCKING BOY

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.vykFUdiQ5a4RSw63ZB9tswHaEc%26pid%3DApi&f=1

https://i.imgur.com/JFlFOCI.png

Pretty sure it's "linespacing" in the BluePlayerList/RedPlayerList part of scoreboard.res

It looks like it's just omphud with the damage numbers (huddamageaccount.res) taken from grapehud.

Follow up on this, what Collaide said was exactly correct. It took me two weeks or so to get used to the ever-so-slightly different grip, and the mouse feels amazing now. I'd recommend it for anyone that likes the g403 and wants a wireless mouse with a new hero sensor.

Personally I still render in 1440p from Vegas for stuff recorded in 1080 simply for the extra bitrate allowance on youtube.

I've heard from other people that they've had the same problem with uploading a raw video from shadowplay, with max bitrate too, I think the problem may be due to how the raw video is encoded.

What bitrate are you using when you upload?

Lots of people in tf2 these days upload their videos at 1440p, even if it's 1080 upscaled, because youtube has a much higher bitrate allowance for 1440p videos.

If he's as keen as you say, hit me up on steam.

aHUD without the box animations

Honestly I feel that the ETF2L rule could be adopted and maybe changed a little but it's pretty fair, as long as it's applied properly.

"A team’s active line-up may only consist of a limited amount of higher skilled players that joined after the Provisional Tiers were published. A point system is used to determine this restriction. A player will be given one “point” for each tier of experience higher than the division of the team the player joins.

Example: In 6v6, a Division 2 player joining a Low team will count as two points, which puts the team above the one point limit. For Season 37 experience we will look at matches from Season 34 onwards."

This would mean that the team gets one warning for each match played with this player, and the third warning means permamently losing one league point, in ETF2L at least. This could be changed to be harsher to really put off sandbaggers. I personally played in div 1 a while ago as scout, then when I joined a mid team as soldier was told by admins I couldn't play scout, which was perfectly fair.

The former

A hot chocolate and a tennents

Regardless of your stance on the plugins, if the admins never try them out in a season, people will cry endlessly about not having them in a season.

This way, if it goes well and people like the plugins/changes, good job admins. If people don't like them, we revert and admins don't have to deal with people crying about not having the changes tested.