things don't really belong in your asshole, but if you wanna put em there I ain't one to judge

The difference is the top 4 teams actually placed in the standard prize distribution of a competition, the other teams didn't they just existed in the division. 2-4 demonstrate that they are at least somewhat competitive even if they aren't trying for 1st or think they can get it. The payout for 5-6 is mostly just because I think tf2 would struggle to get enough teams for mid invite if they just have to pay large fees every season in exchange for nothing.

5-9th place invite shouldn't be getting any prizes imo it discourages competition and help to enable the low-invite cirlejerk to continue to exist. I don't see why you'd want the same little cry babies who don't have a chance of beating froyo and don't even aspire to beat them to continue to take up invite spots rather than bringing in new blood who will at least improve and dream of beating froyo.
You might want to have 5-6 reimbursed for there league fees for placing that high each season, but paying out the 7-9th for just existing feels stupid af especially when the top advanced teams are probably better than or at least competitive with them.

3mil infections / 217k is about 14% that's before taking into account chinas blatantly false numbers and keep in mind death rates will likely go up as infections increase because there won't be enough staff or medical supplies to treat everyone

You understand millions of people will die of starvation if the lockdown continues much longer right, but I guess it's just gonna be poor brownies in countries you don't care about so it's nbd right :) #keepthewhitiessafe

It's pretty amazing that the most toxic people are always one's the tf2 community defends

Also to blame capitalism for deaths of people because they didn't give those people the resources they need is absurd. Are you to blame for every person who dies because you didn't take up a job as a relief worker to save them, must every person make a sacrifice for the benefit of others or be responsible for harm that comes from not making said sacrifice?

Food and medicine isn't just a distribution problem, it's mainly a storage problem it doesn't matter if we drop a literal ton of food onto every starving African village the food will spoil in days and they don't have the necessary medical knowledge to properly dose and apply most medicines you can give them. I know it's really easy to blame everything on "greedy capitalists", but these problems are much more complex than you're making them out to be.

I don't know dude mao and stalin intentionally starved people, tortured and imprisoned people I think it's pretty reasonable to blame those deaths on the government whereas your desire to blame the inherent principles of scarcity and the fragility of human life on capitalism is kind of laughable.

When I've lived with someone for years and I ask them to get milk at the store, but don't specify the exact % fat of milk I want and they get me the wrong one. Like do you even know me?

You sure get some quality admins when you just take the first retards to apply :)

when you get into a stalemate you can do other things than sac your roamer

Pelosi having to fight harder means she must have someone to fight against (republicans/trump), saying it's the best the senate could do further implies that the other branches of government were opposed to it. I don't know how little you know about the political landscape, but the speaker of the house of opposition party is generally in direct opposition to the president as long as it is politically beneficial. Maybe mustard was trying to say Pelosi didn't want a better relief bill, but idk why'd you say fought if that's what you meant.

Renting to someone is seen as a service you're continually purchasing, a mortgage is just a loan on something you already theoretically have bought.

I think the implication of your comments was pretty clear, but we can pretend you didn't mean it if you want :)