InternetIntellectual
Account Details
SteamID64 76561198273979260
SteamID3 [U:1:313713532]
SteamID32 STEAM_0:0:156856766
Country United Kingdom
Signed Up September 24, 2017
Last Posted August 6, 2018 at 6:45 PM
Posts 35 (0 per day)
1 2 3
#20 Petition to ban nutshiny and telephone_fan in The Dumpster

"There is no perfect town, nor would we want there to be," said Arminass. "A healthy town needs no Priests, but it needs for there to be error at every step. When the town ceases to be healthy, that error rears its ugly head, and the generation at the time takes care of it. If at some point the people are too weak to overcome it, the town has reached old age and must die."

"That's a lie," said the grandson. "There could be a perfect town."

"There could," said Arminass. "But then it would fall apart inward, since there would be nothing to strive for, no reason for exchange of blows or leaders."

Quite simply, a healthy forum needs shitposters, or in wider terms, people need someone to hate. To put it in context for this forum: every once in a while, the forum comes together to hate b4nny. However, there is a lot of downtime in the biannual b4nny hate threads. As of recently, perfection has done the deed of playing the major heel role. While he continues to make post after post in the open thread, people respond to his posts sarcastically and/or maliciously, which generates some sort of enjoyment to the general populous of the forum. People love to hate, and when they see someone like perfection getting ganged up upon by multiple open circlejerks at once, you are entertained.
Sentinel's post above mine proves my point.

posted about 6 years ago
#11 Is music objective or subjective? in Music, Movies, TV

Good morning all (for us Britons up at 3 am like a prim and proper man) - the question of "is music objective or subjective?" relies on the answer to a very important question - is Nihilism legitimate? To answer this, we must first define nihilism (the nihilism I am referencing):

"a doctrine that denies any objective ground of truth and especially of moral truths" - Merriam-Webster

The form of nihilism I will be talking about is "Active Nihilism" - Active nihilism is symptomatic of an increased power of the spirit. The will is strengthened and rebellious. This is the form of nihilism that does not stop at judgement, but goes on in action to be destructive towards the remaining vestiges of empty value systems. The strength of the will is tested by whether or not it can recognise all value systems as empty and meaningless, yet admit that these lies arise out of us and serve a purpose. This denial of a truthful world, Nietzsche says, may be a “divine way of thinking”. The active nihilist recognises that simplification and lies are necessary for life. The value of values becomes their emptiness. Where rationality and reason have clearly failed, the nihilist embraces irrationality and freedom from logic. The will now has an opportunity to assert its strength and power to deny all authority and deny goals and faith– to deny the constraints of existence. Nietzsche describes this state as both destructive and ironic.

Active nihilism obviously is not an end, however. It merely opens the stage for the beginning of a revaluation of values. It opens the stage for the will to take power and assert itself. Nihilism is the precursor to revaluation, it does not replace values, it only tears them away. It functions as an essential transition, and must be understood as a means and not an end. When people ask how you can be a nihilist and still be striving for something other than self-pleasure, remember this: nihilism means denial of inherent value. It does not mean denial of functionality, or loss of a desire for our actions to be constructive and produce aesthetic beauty in life. Nihilism simply states that there is no inherent morality, or in other words no morality of method, so we must be willing to do immoral things for moral ends.

When Plato wrote his metaphor of the cave, he was talking primarily about instance/essence confusions. (While most scholars prefer to think he is speaking of a dualistic world where perfect archetypes exist, his point is actually the opposite -- no such world exists, because essence is defined not by duplicating instances in a purer form, but by being the attributes in common between all instances.)

In the Platonic view, most people are looking at instances (outcomes) and believing they see a pure essence (meaning), when really what they see is specific to their participation in the event -- and therefore, like morality, is easily gamed into a "I demand freedom so you cannot force me to change, even as I force you to change to avoid inconveniencing me wherever I go," which he identifies as the decay of a civilization.

When we are children, the difference between instance and essence is clearer to us. We have recently learned words like "chair," and know that not all chairs are alike. We even draw the distinction "all chairs are like my chair" without assuming that all chairs spring from that one chair. But as time goes on, through a sleight of hand, we are convinced to build up an idealized, socially-driven version of more complex ideas that conflates to "all things like this are like the version I have most closely experienced." For example, in morality we conclude that our deaths would be an injustice, therefore all killing is wrong -- but how easily we are lured into paradox when it comes to killing those we perceive as threats.

The principle of active nihilism is one of ultimate reality: we are real, in a physical world that is real, with real consequences for any given action. There are no inherent goals, so we must pick one. If we like life, that goal is survival. If we want to maximize survival, we pick a systematic method (the scientific method) for discovering truth, or mental constructs that correspond to constructs existing in the physical world. After all, the one inherent thing to life is physical reality outside of us; everything else is up for grabs or ambiguous.

To conclude, music is always subjective, as is truth. Though a granny smith apple might appear green to you, a colourblind person might see it as a different color. A rorschach test fields different answers, but the different answers might not be inherently wrong. High level mathematics results in multiple different answers for problems in areas such as calculus. Reality is nihilism.

Best,
InternetIntellectual
clintonfoundation@nuke.africa

posted about 6 years ago
#17 album recommendations in Music, Movies, TV

These albums I am about to list are somewhat esoteric, and when you finally crawl through the thick, foggy swamp of the unknown that reveals the hiding places of these albums, you quite literally might be too stupid to understand these works of art. I'm saying that as a warning, because I can say confidently that these albums are only reserved for those who have the trained ear, the high intellectual capacity, and the willpower to say NO to the dogmatic music industries of the world, continually pumping out cookie cutter garbage to brainwash the "normies" (as I like to address them). This is for the people who want to be met with a challenge. This is for the people who have a love for wisdom. If you are able to fully appreciate these albums, I KNOW you are an intellectual.

Brockhampton - Discography
Animal Collective - Merriweather Post Pavilion
Kendrick Lamar - To Pimp a Butterfly
Death Grips - The Money Store
Tool - Lateralus
Madvillain - Madvillainy
MF Doom - Mm... Food
Run The Jewels - Discography
Tame Impala - Lonerism
Deafheaven - Sunbather
King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard - Discography
Grimes - Visions
Anything Anthony Fantano has given an 8

Thank you for at least attempting to break free of the chains of popular music. Once you have listened to all of these albums, you will finally be able to look in the mirror and confidently say, "I am free" (and totally not have stumbled into another pit of collectivism).

posted about 6 years ago
#53 what r yr politicals in Off Topic

https://i.imgur.com/64i4ttG.png

posted about 6 years ago
#278 favorite b4nny tweet? in Off Topic
Corunson*Duwatna has to get appendix removed last year*

B4nny: Oh no really unfortunate, I was looking forward to the return of STEEEEEEEEVE! Hope he has a good recovery <3

*Kaptain gets food poisoning*

B4nny: LOL what a pussy! he fears me!, good excuse to dodge lan xd

Not a fair comparison. b4nny won multiple seasons, multiple ESEA LANs and 2 international LANs with duwatna, and has quite obviously formed a bond with him. Comparing the respect he gives to a former teammate, to him trolling his opponents, and saying the latter is how he treats Europeans isn't fair at all. It feels like every stream I've watched from him, he does this same sort of trolling to his opponents in PUGs, regardless of who he is actually facing. And him making a troll tweet to Se7en is supposed to be outrageous? He literally did the same thing to members of Ascent:

https://i.imgur.com/GHPr8uc.png

On one hand, this has been too heavily dramaticized, but on the other hand, it's made the LAN event a lot more entertaining from a spectator's perspective.

posted about 6 years ago
#25 Rewind II UF: TBD in Matches
StalinPower"Where's sportsmanship?" There's no sportsmanship when you are talking about team with b4nny. He doesn't care about such things, he really wants 7 to loose more than other teams. It can be seen from his twitter(when 7 played against Ascent and SWIFT). Disgusting person. Hope Kaptain will be ok...

So how is it a surprise that b4nny is supportive of teams and players he interacts with on a daily basis in the same scene he plays in? I remember watching the i55 final and hearing the crowd be much more responsive to nerdRage having a cool moment compared to when FROYO did. Supporting whatever is local is natural. With many of the top NA players at Rewind, b4nny has seen the growth that occurred that made them into the players they are today. And while there has obviously been bad blood in the past between members of Se7en and b4nny, I believe that the support b4nny is giving to the NA teams is simply just due to the personal connections he has with the players. After all, as soon as the Granary match ended, Se7en members walked over and started chatting with FROYO members. I don't believe that this LAN is as dramatic as some of you are making it out to be.

TwiiKuuI'm not sure what I initially meant by "a man down" (very tired and frustrated) but what I'd like to make clear is that Se7en had been playing for 10 minutes with a crippled player, who was then traded for a (sorry perm) lesser player and a role shakeup, anyone in their right minds would have offered 5 minutes for Se7en to talk it over and a round restart, if not for a map restart. B4nny claims that he strives to bring Good TF2, but before anything else, TF2 is a competition, and good competitors follow good sportsmanship etiquette.
It has frustrated me very much to see such a hyped up match-up get wasted because all of this.

This idea of "sportsmanship" you are talking about is wishful thinking propagated by A) your aforementioned frustration and B) support for Se7en. The outrage would be more understandable if FROYO denied a 5 minute break, but I don't believe that Se7en even asked for one, and instead took a break in between the 2 games, which was the more sensible thing to do. A map restart is realistically too much to ask for, since no foul play occurred that somehow nullified the current match, and I don't see why any team in FROYO's situation would be willing to discard the first 2 rounds when they were able perform well with Se7en's full roster present. I'm sure we can agree that even an ill kaptain is better than Permzilla.

posted about 6 years ago
#11 Florida High School Shooting in World Events

Well well well, if it isn't the most scorching red-hot take of them all! Banning guns, it's as simple as elementary school addition, right?

If you look at these incidents and immediately look towards the idea of "banning weapons", then that's ignoring the issue underneath; why are kids growing up wanting to hurt one another in exponential rates? Could it be - a totally sick society? Because you can ban weapons all you want, but what happens when kids are still angry at their peers and they start crafting pressure cooker bombs (WHICH REQUIRE ONLY 3 INGREDIENTS)? You can take away all the firearms, blunt every knife, put metal detectors in the school entrances (INB4 3D PRINTING LOL) and wrap the students in kevlar and bubble wrap, then maybe the violence in the schools will go down. However, whatever is still making these kids sick in the head will still exist, and it statistically won't get better for them as their lives progress. Are we then supposed to inject workplaces with these same regulations aswell? Concerts? Marathons?

₩̱̦ͅɆ̜Ⱡ̦̣̥̩̭₵̫̠̻̻̩Ø̡͍̟̫̱̗̺₥͓̬̙̖̯̼Ɇ́ ̟̣̙ͅ₮̫͍̠͖̭̣̫̕Ø̡̙ ̶̗̥̘₵̘́ł̠̜͕͇̣͕̻͘₮̱̯̟Ɏ̬͉ ̻͍̰͉̮̗1͇͚̮͙̗͝7͈̯

posted about 6 years ago
#45 How do you like to spend your weekends? in Off Topic

Ponder about Nietzschean metaphysics

posted about 6 years ago
#21 Stalin, the greatest Russian leader of all time? in Off Topic
knsumetheres no way in hell im reading all that shit

That's okay, not everyone was born to be a thinking man. The average man, such as yourself, is satisfied spending your hours reading John Green books, or watching contemporary television. For me? I like to re-watch Fight Club and document my journey through NoFap. You are a part of society like everyone else, and you can be a big part, or a small part, but that is not up to you. What matters is that you are doing your best, and maybe for you, doing your best so far is racking up more expenses on Mom and Dad's electricity bill through heavy computer usage for your extended leisurely activities, and there is nothing wrong with that. Some trees will grow hundreds of feet high and stand for hundreds of years, some trees will be struck by lightning within 5 years of growth. Some trees won't pierce the skies as well as their peers, and there is nothing wrong with that. If (the hypothetical) God doesn't have a plan for us, Nature does.

Best,
InternetIntellectual
clintonfoundation@nuke.africa

posted about 6 years ago
#17 Stalin, the greatest Russian leader of all time? in Off Topic

InternetIntellectual here. I see the question that has arose, and in order to prepare my mind to answer this question, I have done the following: eat chicken, rice, and broccoli for every meal of the day, watch 4 Jordan B. Peterson lectures, intake 4 doses of Super Male Vitality, and to conclude, practice my knowledge of logical fallacies on my custom Quizlet set. Now, my answer to this question? It depends.

In 1928, one of Stalin’s goals was to rapidly develop a heavy industry. Stalin wanted to make the Soviet Union an industrial fortress and a strong nationalistic state. He figured to make Russian communism succeed industrial power was immediately needed. This was to be achieved by creating a command economy, which had meant that the industry was being forced to industrialize. Lenin had previously destroyed the power of private businesses to create a manageable industry. Therefore, when Stalin came into power, most of the major industries were already in government hands. Stalin had stated that stated that the Soviet Union was behind advanced societies, and that they had to industrialize quickly before ‘enemies’ would crush them. Heavy industry was essential for defense and for supplying agricultural tractors and combines. Stalin had believed that equality and democracy had to wait until the Soviet Union had a thriving industrial economy. In 1928, Stalin replaced Lenin’s New Economic Policy (NEP) by the first Five-Year Plan. Where within a five-year period, each business was given a target that it must reach. The punishments for failing to meet the target were extremely severe. Many people were forced to work against their own will but Stalin felt that the policy was essential. The first three Five-year Plan from 1928 to 1941 increased production about 400%. By the mid-1930s Russia had surpassed the 1913 production figures of iron, coal and oil. There was no country ever known to industrialize so quickly. As a result, unemployment had been abolished. As Stalin was industrializing the country, he felt it was necessary to collectivize the farms of the country.

As heavy industry developed, agriculture was to be collectivized. In 1929, collectivization began. There would be no more individual farms, and no more individual farmers selling their goods independently. The farmers were required to hand over a certain amount of produce to the state each year. The young, large-scale, socialized agriculture, growing now even faster than big industry, had a great future and could show miracles of growth. Collectivization was mainly directed against the kulaks, which were the rich peasants who owned their own land. Basically, Stalin would take land from the people who had owned it since 1861. Many peasants were forced to work for the state as a part of a collective commune. Some peasants and many kulaks resisted collectivization. They slaughtered their own cattle rather than to turn it over to the government. As a result, they were killed or sent to labor camps called the ‘gulags’. By 1934, 70% of all the farms in Russia were collectivized and the kulaks were eliminated as a class. On the collective farms, peasants would be paid wages in return for handing over the produce to the government.

Under Stalin’s power, the Soviet Union became more involved in international affairs. During the WW1, Russia did not play a major role in the Great War. They didn’t have a strong military and their economy was weak. Even in the past, Russia was not active in international affairs as they were under Stalin’s control. In 1934, the Soviet Union joined the League of Nations and made diplomatic agreements. This made Russia’s defense stronger than the German oppression. Before WW2, both the axis powers and the democracies realized that the balance of power in Europe depended of which side Russia joined. If they joined Britain and France, Hitler would be forced to fight a two-front war. Both sides entered negotiations with Russia, but Stalin and communist Russia had been distrusted by both sides in the past. On August 23, 1939, Stalin and Hitler signed a non-aggression treaty. This Nazi-Soviet pact was shocking to all countries, but Russia had stated that it was for national self-interest only. Stalin wished to avoid war until, at least Russia was prepared. But later, Stalin was aware that Germany might eventually attack his country. On June 1941, German troops invaded Russia. Hitler’s invasion on Russia, convinced the Soviet Union to join the ‘Grand Alliance’, which consisted of only Great Britain and the United States. Then later 26 other nations signed the Atlantic Charter, which was the beginning of the formation of the United Nations. By February 1943, Russia successfully stopped the German advance, which had attacked Stalingrad. Russia’s military, as a result, became stronger.

Therefore, although people had died through Stalin’s cruel methods of making Russia powerful, he deserves the title of the ‘Father of the USSR’, because he successfully industrialized the country, collectivized the farms and made the Soviet Union more active in international affairs. Within ten years, a primarily feudal country changed into an industrialized one. He also collectivized the farms for the good of the people as a whole. He leaded Russia into gaining more victories for the country by becoming more involved in worldwide affairs. Like a father, he guided his child, the USSR, to become stronger and more powerful among others. By setting crucial goals for the country, the Soviet Union became stronger than it was before Stalin was in power. The only question that concerns many is, were there any other alternatives of achieving his goals, without killing millions?

To answer this question, we are able to compare Stalin to another infamous man who is known for killing millions: Adolf Hitler. Both the Nazis and the Soviets thought globally but acted regionally. The men and women who made the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 had dreamed of a world revolution, but they had to concentrate instead on making a Eurasian state. After the workers of the world failed to unite, Russia’s revolutionaries built a regime around their own revolution, the Soviet Union, whose task was to embody “socialism in one country.”

In the 1920s and 1930s, thought Stalin, the British fleet presided over an imperialist world of global free trade; all that remained for him was the selfcolonization of the USSR.1 This meant above all the control and exploitation of fertile lands in Ukraine and southern Russia, where a surplus could be extracted and used to finance industrialization and defense. Stalin was particularly concerned about Soviet Ukraine, since it had to be simultaneously mastered by violence and protected from the influence of the capitalist states on its western border, such as Poland. He feared that Ukraine might be lost to the imperialists of the capitalist world, but he only slowly grasped the specific German threat.

Adolf Hitler’s quite different vision of ideological transformation was also global in principle but regional in practice. In his view the Jews were Germany’s misfortune, not only at home, but abroad. They had, he believed, created the heartless British and American finance capitalism that dominated the world. In the long run, Germany must rescue the world from pernicious Jewry. In the meantime, destroying the Soviet Union, which Hitler also alleged was dominated by Jews, would make Germany a continental power capable of fulfilling its global destiny. German modern industrial accomplishment would be balanced by establishing a new agrarian colony in Eastern Europe, above all Ukraine.

posted about 6 years ago
#279 ESEA Season 27 Open Discussion in TF2 General Discussion

https://i.imgur.com/BZ6AnRu.jpg

My Awesome Team Just CRUSHED This Dumbass CSGO Team
5҉͘ ͟-̵ ̕͡0̷ ͘͡.҉̡.͟.̴͢͞.
NO SURVIVORS

posted about 6 years ago
#38 rate the image above. in Off Topic

7/10

https://i.imgur.com/B9VP6pG.jpg

posted about 6 years ago
#5 open letter to everyone who lies about damage in The Dumpster

Me: "Medic Took 0"

https://i.imgur.com/XZX8pXL.jpg

My Team:

https://i.imgur.com/WOLIX6N.png

posted about 6 years ago
#611 worst steam profile in Off Topic

https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198237193302

posted about 6 years ago
#7 What if... in Off Topic

InternetIntellectual here. I have done much thinking, gone through many bowls of pipe tobacco, and watched all Jordan B. Peterson lectures I can get my hands on. Officially, I am here to say that: The Earth is flat.

This is a belief I hold as the beginning of an ongoing search for truth and certainty. It is a starting point - an intellectual foundation on which I feel further knowledge can soundly be built. Much as Descartes did in his Meditations on First Philosophy, I wish to start from a place of certainty and build upon it. The Flat Earth is an obvious truth to me now. My senses show me and my reason confirms it.

However, my belief that the Earth is flat is not a popular one and it is not a belief I have always held. Like most people, I was taught from an early age that the Earth is a rotating sphere which, along with a collection of other spherical bodies, revolves in an elliptical orbit around our Sun. To most of you, this will seem like an obvious and unarguable fact. It is something you have been told by teachers. Told by parents. Told by textbooks. It is something you are utterly sure of. And, more than likely, it is something you have never truly investigated. It isn’t surprising, then, that people believe so strongly that the Earth is a sphere. We are bombarded every day of our lives with information. Television, radio, books and the Internet all compete to tell us things. Society agrees that some ideas are worth debating and that others are not. The idea of a spherical Earth falls into that second category. At some point, our society decided with great certainty that the Earth is a sphere and, consequently, that further consideration is unnecessary and anyone holding an opposing viewpoint is unworthy of debate. That the Earth is spherical is a ‘fact’ and we are, from an early age, told to accept it without question and in the face of our own first-­hand experience. But as 16th Century mathematician Pierre-­Simon Laplace stated, "The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness." The Spherical Earth model is truly extraordinary and runs contrary to all of our senses. Consequently, the burden of proof is extraordinary - and this burden has never been met. But, because the idea is so firmly ingrained in our culture, few of us bother to hold the Spherical Earth model to account.

This tendency to firmly maintain beliefs while intentionally disregarding opposing evidence – particularly evidence in the form of first-­‐hand experience - is intellectually dishonest and unscientific. Man’s quest for truth is furthered only through experience and reason. During the 19th Century, Samuel Birley Rowbotham pioneered an approach to astronomy called Zetetic Astronomy. Zeteticism stresses the importance of reason and experience over the trusting acceptance of dogma. This emphasis on experience as the only source of true knowledge dates back to ancient Greek empiricists such as Aristotle and was also prominent in the more recent British empiricism espoused by John Locke. In his An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Locke states, “No man’s knowledge can go beyond his experience.” While second-­hand ‘knowledge’ is often a useful tool for dealing with practical, day-­to-­day tasks, it should not be mistaken for truth and certainty.

Godspeed, all my brothers who are joining me in this quest to pull back the curtain and show the world the truth.

posted about 6 years ago
1 2 3