NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198047126327 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:86860599] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:43430299 |
Country | Canada |
Signed Up | October 2, 2012 |
Last Posted | October 17, 2023 at 10:10 PM |
Posts | 2079 (0.4 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
busdriver obv
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Elyg7cad2dY
should also include poker II. ive heard great things about them and i get mine tomorrow
you shattered all my glass feelings for sure
hooliHellbentFucking amazing monitor buy one now if you haven't alreadytypical dumb hellbent noob
Lightboost !!!
if you dont want me to call you bad then dont pick a fight
god youre like mason but with no balls
http://www.blurbusters.com/zero-motion-blur/lightboost-faq/LightBoost does increase input lag by half a frame.
Since input lag for top edge of screen can vary from bottom edge, and strobe backlights give interesting behaviors — For the average ASUS/BENQ 120Hz LightBoost screen, non-LightBoost TOP/CENTER/BOTTOM is 3ms/7ms/11ms while LightBoost TOP/CENTER/BOTTOM is 11ms/11ms/11ms. This averages out to half a frame added input lag (3ms -> 7ms) with LightBoost.
it's literally in the thread
not sure what the typical 'human brain refresh rate' is supposed to be. now testing it ya i can see a very insignificant input lag, but also pretty awful blur whenever i decide to flick/rj.
but whatever go back to your fast-paced sticky trap placement if that's really what is superior for you
hoolitypical dumb hellbent noob
144 hertz is better than 120 hertz lightboosted
the amount of input lag present when lightboosted is unacceptable and the smoothness of 144 hertz is far more beneficial than how clear individual 120 hz frames are
i'd still get the monitor, best monitor on the market and 144 hertz is great
edit: try both and see for yourself
I've obviously tried both and like the lightboost more. Apart from me doing quite a lot of jumping, I also flick aim quite a bit so having heavily reduced motion blur is worth the 7ms or so input lag that I can't even notice.
It makes sense to me that scout mains, and demos that stare at the same sticky trap for 12 minutes while their team disintegrates around them would enjoy 144hz more as they are not flicking nearly as much, but then again why argue with the king of useless information.
Try both and pick what feels best instead of theorizing how a loss of 1/40th of the normal human reaction time will effect your gaming experience.
Fucking amazing monitor buy one now if you haven't already
Lightboost !!!
hooli continues to surprise me with his stupidity
time after time after time idk how you do it man
I also loved how you just had alfa as sniper instead of scout
MaxHaxBe free from mon-thursday 9est-11 est.
praise allah
id do it for free
i love me some black man