Tino_You cant gish gallop in text you moron. You have infinite time to respond to each point.
The essence of gish gallop is overwhelming the opponent with countless arguments and information you braindead leaf, there is no universal definition for this term.
HaXxorIzedThe problem with your attempt to portray this as a gish gallop is twofold.
- There are really two ideas being discussed - the issue of Endogeneity confounding 'basic' statistical analysis that doesn't adjust for it; and then establishing how the idea of Redlining is just an example of an omitted variable (source of bias) that means the analysis being offered in this thread is flawed if it doesn't consider it The topic sentences establish this quite clearly.
- If you intend to make sweeping judgments on the behaviour and motivations behind large groups of human beings, you are making an overwhelming claim. The evidence and analysis you use for that claim should reflect the scope, breadth, and depth of it.
Anyway, if I was writing a dissertation I'd use latex. Formatting is more fun there!
He linked like three studies. Say what you mean in three paragraphs if you want to be verbose. You raise two issues, but support each of these issues with a total of 40 links, quoting your friend, put in some personal thoughts, find space to be patronizing every second sentence, the structure is also all over the place. This is completely incoherent. For the record, I do not question the validity of what you said, just the dishonest format and mannerism you chose.