Upvote Upvoted 39 Downvote Downvoted
1 ⋅⋅ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ⋅⋅ 24
ESEA S18 & TF2
151
#151
ESEA
3 Frags +
manaShooter, can we get an update on this? We're looking good for IM and Open, at this rate.

IM has 7 teams fully paid, Open has 22 teams fully paid.

I see 22 teams paid in Open, and only 7 teams in Intermediate. A total of 29 fully paid teams.

[quote=mana]Shooter, can we get an update on this? We're looking good for IM and Open, at this rate.

IM has 7 teams fully paid, Open has 22 teams fully paid.[/quote]

I see 22 teams paid in Open, and only 7 teams in Intermediate. A total of 29 fully paid teams.
152
#152
7 Frags +

Is that the only update, or has the decision been delayed?

Is that the only update, or has the decision been delayed?
153
#153
-3 Frags +

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpsbj0OoeNo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpsbj0OoeNo
154
#154
ESEA
1 Frags +
SAAM_Is that the only update, or has the decision been delayed?

Update!

[quote=SAAM_]Is that the only update, or has the decision been delayed?[/quote]
Update!
155
#155
6 Frags +
ESEA-ShootermanaShooter, can we get an update on this? We're looking good for IM and Open, at this rate.

IM has 7 teams fully paid, Open has 22 teams fully paid.

I see 22 teams paid in Open, and only 7 teams in Intermediate. A total of 29 fully paid teams.

That is indeed what mana said. What mana was asking was what is the status for esea TF2 considering the amount of teams that have fully paid.

[quote=ESEA-Shooter][quote=mana]Shooter, can we get an update on this? We're looking good for IM and Open, at this rate.

IM has 7 teams fully paid, Open has 22 teams fully paid.[/quote]

I see 22 teams paid in Open, and only 7 teams in Intermediate. A total of 29 fully paid teams.[/quote]

That is indeed what mana said. What mana was asking was what is the status for esea TF2 considering the amount of teams that have fully paid.
156
#156
4 Frags +
ESEA-ShootermanaShooter, can we get an update on this? We're looking good for IM and Open, at this rate.

IM has 7 teams fully paid, Open has 22 teams fully paid.

I see 22 teams paid in Open, and only 7 teams in Intermediate. A total of 29 fully paid teams.

29 FULLY paid, i see a bunch of teams with 4-5 players paid up right now, i don't think they'd have that many paid up without the intention to play.

[quote=ESEA-Shooter][quote=mana]Shooter, can we get an update on this? We're looking good for IM and Open, at this rate.

IM has 7 teams fully paid, Open has 22 teams fully paid.[/quote]

I see 22 teams paid in Open, and only 7 teams in Intermediate. A total of 29 fully paid teams.[/quote]


29 FULLY paid, i see a bunch of teams with 4-5 players paid up right now, i don't think they'd have that many paid up without the intention to play.
157
#157
4 Frags +

Due to the number of teams currently registered, steps obviously have to be taken. There's currently nowhere near enough teams registered to justify having 3 divisions in TF2. At the moment, we are looking at the option of removing Invite and placing the Invite teams into IM. Of course, this isn't something that anyone wants but we can't really have an Invite division with so few teams. This is in no way set in stone but I wanted to let you guys know what's going on behind the scenes as registration comes closer.

Due to the number of teams currently registered, steps obviously have to be taken. There's currently nowhere near enough teams registered to justify having 3 divisions in TF2. At the moment, we are looking at the option of removing Invite and placing the Invite teams into IM. Of course, this isn't something that anyone wants but we can't really have an Invite division with so few teams. This is in no way set in stone but I wanted to let you guys know what's going on behind the scenes as registration comes closer.
158
#158
1 Frags +

If anyone still needs a player to fill out their roster I am available.

If anyone still needs a player to fill out their roster I am available.
159
#159
12 Frags +
KillingDue to the number of teams currently registered, steps obviously have to be taken. There's currently nowhere near enough teams registered to justify having 3 divisions in TF2. At the moment, we are looking at the option of removing Invite and placing the Invite teams into IM. Of course, this isn't something that anyone wants but we can't really have an Invite division with so few teams. This is in no way set in stone but I wanted to let you guys know what's going on behind the scenes as registration comes closer.

would that mean lan is removed?

[quote=Killing]Due to the number of teams currently registered, steps obviously have to be taken. There's currently nowhere near enough teams registered to justify having 3 divisions in TF2. At the moment, we are looking at the option of removing Invite and placing the Invite teams into IM. Of course, this isn't something that anyone wants but we can't really have an Invite division with so few teams. This is in no way set in stone but I wanted to let you guys know what's going on behind the scenes as registration comes closer.[/quote]

would that mean lan is removed?
160
#160
5 Frags +

What is the minimum amount of teams needed to keep IM?

And is it really easier to axe IM than give Gravegun's Aneurysm an IM roster? :|

What is the minimum amount of teams needed to keep IM?

And is it really easier to axe IM than give Gravegun's Aneurysm an IM roster? :|
161
#161
8 Frags +
Mr_Owlif you plan on playing this season and you're not paid up by thursday night youre the reason tf2 is dead
[quote=Mr_Owl]if you plan on playing this season and you're not paid up by thursday night youre the reason tf2 is dead[/quote]
162
#162
3 Frags +

http://play.esea.net/teams/93491
is guaranteed to be paid up as long as they get a starting six.

http://play.esea.net/teams/93491
is guaranteed to be paid up as long as they get a starting six.
163
#163
-2 Frags +
UniverserulerKillingDue to the number of teams currently registered, steps obviously have to be taken. There's currently nowhere near enough teams registered to justify having 3 divisions in TF2. At the moment, we are looking at the option of removing Invite and placing the Invite teams into IM. Of course, this isn't something that anyone wants but we can't really have an Invite division with so few teams. This is in no way set in stone but I wanted to let you guys know what's going on behind the scenes as registration comes closer.
would that mean lan is removed?

Correct

[quote=Universeruler][quote=Killing]Due to the number of teams currently registered, steps obviously have to be taken. There's currently nowhere near enough teams registered to justify having 3 divisions in TF2. At the moment, we are looking at the option of removing Invite and placing the Invite teams into IM. Of course, this isn't something that anyone wants but we can't really have an Invite division with so few teams. This is in no way set in stone but I wanted to let you guys know what's going on behind the scenes as registration comes closer.[/quote]

would that mean lan is removed?[/quote]

Correct
164
#164
3 Frags +
ComangliaWell I paid up there better be a league since I'm not playing anyway. #backup

Lewis can join someone's roster that has 5 paid in the meantime if necessary.

[quote=Comanglia]Well I paid up there better be a league since I'm not playing anyway. #backup[/quote]

Lewis can join someone's roster that has 5 paid in the meantime if necessary.
165
#165
2 Frags +
4812622What is the minimum amount of teams needed to keep IM?

And is it really easier to axe IM than give Gravegun's Aneurysm an IM roster? :|

We're looking for at least 16-18 but probably more.

IM has to be able to sustain itself. I cannot manually move up teams every single season.

[quote=4812622]What is the minimum amount of teams needed to keep IM?

And is it really easier to axe IM than give Gravegun's Aneurysm an IM roster? :|[/quote]

We're looking for at least 16-18 but probably more.

IM has to be able to sustain itself. I cannot manually move up teams every single season.
166
#166
cp_granary_pro
2 Frags +

the least amount of teams there's been in IM is 14 and that was s7

the least amount of teams there's been in IM is 14 and that was s7
167
#167
0 Frags +
Killing4812622What is the minimum amount of teams needed to keep IM?

And is it really easier to axe IM than give Gravegun's Aneurysm an IM roster? :|

We're looking for at least 16-18 but probably more.

IM has to be able to sustain itself. I cannot manually move up teams every single season.

Do you know how many teams we need for invite and how many of those are coming from the current pool of IM (should the divisions remain the same)?

[quote=Killing][quote=4812622]What is the minimum amount of teams needed to keep IM?

And is it really easier to axe IM than give Gravegun's Aneurysm an IM roster? :|[/quote]

We're looking for at least 16-18 but probably more.

IM has to be able to sustain itself. I cannot manually move up teams every single season.[/quote]

Do you know how many teams we need for invite and how many of those are coming from the current pool of IM (should the divisions remain the same)?
168
#168
10 Frags +

Why not make final decisions on divisions once the final deadline hits?

There are IM teams that are still finalizing player decisions.

Why not make final decisions on divisions once the final deadline hits?

There are IM teams that are still finalizing player decisions.
169
#169
11 Frags +

I understand the push to action by putting a deadline and all, but this season looks almost guaranteed to surpass the last few in terms of paying teams. Something like removing lan is a huge consequence, particularly when things look to be on the upswing.

I understand the push to action by putting a deadline and all, but this season looks almost guaranteed to surpass the last few in terms of paying teams. Something like removing lan is a huge consequence, particularly when things look to be on the upswing.
170
#170
0 Frags +

Another thing to watch out for is alienating new clients. Most players - although there are exceptions - want nothing to do with playing top tier talent in their first season.

Another thing to watch out for is alienating new clients. Most players - although there are exceptions - want nothing to do with playing top tier talent in their first season.
171
#171
3 Frags +
Stochast1cKilling4812622What is the minimum amount of teams needed to keep IM?

And is it really easier to axe IM than give Gravegun's Aneurysm an IM roster? :|

We're looking for at least 16-18 but probably more.

IM has to be able to sustain itself. I cannot manually move up teams every single season.

Do you know how many teams we need for invite and how many of those are coming from the current pool of IM (should the divisions remain the same)?

I was planning on taking Cisco + Yomies and placing them into Invite prior to finding out that we might not have enough teams for 3 divs.

[quote=Stochast1c][quote=Killing][quote=4812622]What is the minimum amount of teams needed to keep IM?

And is it really easier to axe IM than give Gravegun's Aneurysm an IM roster? :|[/quote]

We're looking for at least 16-18 but probably more.

IM has to be able to sustain itself. I cannot manually move up teams every single season.[/quote]

Do you know how many teams we need for invite and how many of those are coming from the current pool of IM (should the divisions remain the same)?[/quote]

I was planning on taking Cisco + Yomies and placing them into Invite prior to finding out that we might not have enough teams for 3 divs.
172
#172
11 Frags +

i don't know what esea expected abruptly moving the deadline up to thursday, of course many teams won't be payed up. making decisions before the 5th will only have negative consequences.

i don't know what esea expected abruptly moving the deadline up to thursday, of course many teams won't be payed up. making decisions before the 5th will only have negative consequences.
173
#173
2 Frags +

Though I'm just going to say we appreciate the communication at least Killing. I'll try to talk to people and see about helping everyone get paid up.

Though I'm just going to say we appreciate the communication at least Killing. I'll try to talk to people and see about helping everyone get paid up.
174
#174
10 Frags +
radiumWhy not make final decisions on divisions once the final deadline hits?

There are IM teams that are still finalizing player decisions.

It would help if those IM teams at least partially pay up so I can count them in for the next season. Not paying for any players but promising to do so isn't really something I can take to my boss.

[quote=radium]Why not make final decisions on divisions once the final deadline hits?

There are IM teams that are still finalizing player decisions.[/quote]

It would help if those IM teams at least partially pay up so I can count them in for the next season. Not paying for any players but promising to do so isn't really something I can take to my boss.
175
#175
5 Frags +

How many people paid up signals a committment? 2-3?

How many people paid up signals a committment? 2-3?
176
#176
2 Frags +
KillingI was planning on taking Cisco + Yomies and placing them into Invite prior to finding out that we might not have enough teams for 3 divs.

Would getting the required IM teams paid keep invite around then? Nobody from invite has paid and I'm not sure how many teams are dead. To me it sounds like the best we can do at this point is have a two division season unless every invite team is planning on playing.

[quote=Killing]
I was planning on taking Cisco + Yomies and placing them into Invite prior to finding out that we might not have enough teams for 3 divs.[/quote]

Would getting the required IM teams paid keep invite around then? Nobody from invite has paid and I'm not sure how many teams are dead. To me it sounds like the best we can do at this point is have a two division season unless every invite team is planning on playing.
177
#177
1 Frags +
KillingStochast1cKilling4812622What is the minimum amount of teams needed to keep IM?

And is it really easier to axe IM than give Gravegun's Aneurysm an IM roster? :|

We're looking for at least 16-18 but probably more.

IM has to be able to sustain itself. I cannot manually move up teams every single season.

Do you know how many teams we need for invite and how many of those are coming from the current pool of IM (should the divisions remain the same)?

I was planning on taking Cisco + Yomies and placing them into Invite prior to finding out that we might not have enough teams for 3 divs.

Noting Dagger's post, the lowest number of teams IM has had is 14. Is it possible to move teams up from Open to confirm at least 14 teams to make sure the division stays active?

I apologize that it may seem I'm ignoring your note about divisions being self-sustaining, but maybe in the future make it clear that teams must form and commit sooner, and let this run as a well-placed warning? I believe the community would do what's necessary with more proper time allocation.

No, I'm not advocating the laziness that's been showing in "do everything last minute", for the record.

How many Invite teams would be active w/ Cisco + Yomies being moved up? How many IM teams would be active?

[quote=Killing][quote=Stochast1c][quote=Killing][quote=4812622]What is the minimum amount of teams needed to keep IM?

And is it really easier to axe IM than give Gravegun's Aneurysm an IM roster? :|[/quote]

We're looking for at least 16-18 but probably more.

IM has to be able to sustain itself. I cannot manually move up teams every single season.[/quote]

Do you know how many teams we need for invite and how many of those are coming from the current pool of IM (should the divisions remain the same)?[/quote]

I was planning on taking Cisco + Yomies and placing them into Invite prior to finding out that we might not have enough teams for 3 divs.[/quote]

Noting Dagger's post, the lowest number of teams IM has had is 14. Is it possible to move teams up from Open to confirm at least 14 teams to make sure the division stays active?

I apologize that it may seem I'm ignoring your note about divisions being self-sustaining, but maybe in the future make it clear that teams must form and commit sooner, and let this run as a well-placed warning? I believe the community would do what's necessary with more proper time allocation.

No, I'm not advocating the laziness that's been showing in "do everything last minute", for the record.

How many Invite teams would be active w/ Cisco + Yomies being moved up? How many IM teams would be active?
178
#178
5 Frags +
flatlineHow many people paid up signals a committment? 2-3?

Yes.

[quote=flatline]How many people paid up signals a committment? 2-3?[/quote]

Yes.
179
#179
7 Frags +
Stochast1cKillingI was planning on taking Cisco + Yomies and placing them into Invite prior to finding out that we might not have enough teams for 3 divs.
Would getting the required IM teams paid keep invite around then? Nobody from invite has paid and I'm not sure how many teams are dead. To me it sounds like the best we can do at this point is have a two division season unless every invite team is planning on playing.

If we have a healthy amount of teams in Open + IM then there will be another season of Invite.

[quote=Stochast1c][quote=Killing]
I was planning on taking Cisco + Yomies and placing them into Invite prior to finding out that we might not have enough teams for 3 divs.[/quote]

Would getting the required IM teams paid keep invite around then? Nobody from invite has paid and I'm not sure how many teams are dead. To me it sounds like the best we can do at this point is have a two division season unless every invite team is planning on playing.[/quote]

If we have a healthy amount of teams in Open + IM then there will be another season of Invite.
180
#180
-8 Frags +

this has to be the lowest amount of teams in every division in a long time, s18 is looking grim

this has to be the lowest amount of teams in every division in a long time, s18 is looking grim
1 ⋅⋅ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ⋅⋅ 24
Please sign in through STEAM to post a comment.