ok, ignore the fact that you were not involved in bowl's ban, you, as previously stated, are involved in all bans relevant to sixes in some way, but i'll take your word on this one. why are the guidelines for bans (for the same reason) so case-by-case when they are literally the same at face value. (one person alts, another person alts, yet they receive a different punishment.) i'd like for you to answer the other questions that I have as well.
edit: rgl admins handle bans in their respective leagues, hl admins handle hl bans, 6s admins handle 6s bans.
additionally, if you didn't handle this ban, i will assume that sigafoo was involved with it full-time, considering you're a 6s admin, not a hl admin. therefore, why hasn't sigafoo answered the questions of the community in the past threads that have been created in relation to bans? i'm not attempting to create drama here, i'm just concerned about the unfair treatment of players based on the personal relations of admin-player
edit 2: https://i.gyazo.com/a69c0d834b24524b3196695b62b0f603.png he's active on tftv, it seems he just chooses to answer the questions that do not taint rgl's public image, you can only ignore the criticisms from your playerbase for so long before the bomb explodes
edit 3: https://i.gyazo.com/7d070486b101839c4ab3972d7dd2e9c0.png i also hope that the rgl admins are not going back on their mission statement and making rash, unfair ban decisions. that would really hurt the image of an otherwise consistent and admirable league.