PuoskariwonderlandI didn't say anything about sensitivity but nice one.Nor did I say that you said so. What I said was telling someone the best way of aiming on scout is like saying what is the best sens, it's stupid. You should play with what you're comfortable with, some are more comfortable with flicking, some on tracking. If you just force yourself to do something that's supposedly "the best way" but you're not comfortable with at all you might not improve at all. As you said, personal preference.
Oh please, tell me about accuracy in quake while entirely tracking being worse, I just told in the separate post that entirely tracking isn't ideal at all in quake, because you have to give up your movement a bit every time you want to aim, while also you have to use projectiles which you really want to flick if you want to actually hit something and react fast where to shoot.
EDIT: I can't care enough to think my head through every scout's aim in prem/invite to remember whether some actually just entirely flick aimed or all flick+track, but I have a feeling that most of the top competitive flickers' aims have developed into the track+flick, the ones with slower sensitivities at least.
in one post you state the best sensitivity range, then in the next post you write saying a certain sensitivity is best is dumb. I glazed over the rest.
my quake point just look at great aimers, 45%LG 65-70% rail.
pure tracking aim is much harder and lower accuracy than track + flick.
every really good scout does tracking + flick, because its the optimal style.
like what is your argument, are you actually trying to tell me you should aim with only flicking or only tracking with a shotgun? its not personal preference, that is straight up bad.
honestly don't even answer, I didn't want to write more than a one liner in this thread tbh cause its basic. and you are entitled to your own opinion like I am and everyone else.