daily
Account Details
SteamID64 76561198055675720
SteamID3 [U:1:95409992]
SteamID32 STEAM_0:0:47704996
Country United States
Signed Up September 7, 2016
Last Posted November 7, 2020 at 10:10 AM
Posts 170 (0.1 per day)
Game Settings
In-game Sensitivity 2.8
Windows Sensitivity Default
Raw Input 1
DPI
400
Resolution
1024x768
Refresh Rate
144hz
Hardware Peripherals
Mouse Zowie EC2-A
Keyboard Corsair K70
Mousepad Corsair MM300
Headphones Beyerdynamics DT880s
Monitor ASUS VG248QE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ⋅⋅ 12
#47 :thinking: in TF2 General Discussion
thesqrtminus1why are you shitting something thats giving this dying game free exposure

it doesnt matter if its absolute garbage the channel thats producing it has over 100k subs this is going to bring attention to the game

smh

Yeah, watch out for the heavy mains coming to you in the near future.

posted about 6 years ago
#42 :thinking: in TF2 General Discussion

I am the demo that Ardy killed in that video and I did not sign a release form. I will see Ardy and his team in court.

posted about 6 years ago
#11 Packet Choke Issues in Q/A Help

Added you on Steam to possibly help.

posted about 6 years ago
#19 daily lft - high/mid scout in Recruitment (looking for team)

bump can also play medic

posted about 6 years ago
#5 It's another one of these threads in Videos

that video is just his opinion

ps. this video is just his opinion

ᵈᶦᵈ ʰᵉ ᵐᵉᶰᵗᶦᵒᶰ ᶦᵗ ʷᵃˢ ʲᵘˢᵗ ʰᶦˢ ᵒᵖᶦᶰᶦᵒᶰ﹖

posted about 6 years ago
#5 Earphones - In-ear headphones in Hardware

Dang, I'm sad you want in ears on the cheaper side. I was going to recommend my Etymotic ER4s. I had a mold of the inside of my ear made at a otolaryngologist, and sent them off to ACS Custom for their custom made ear sleeves. About $350 in total, but I'm very happy with the results.

To actually be helpful though.. people always recommend the MEE audio M6 and M6 PRO. Both cheap, ($20, and $45) respectively. Sturdy, and still have a nice flat sound signature.

posted about 6 years ago
#77 n3 lft s24 in Recruitment (looking for team)

n3 is exceptionally nice, hes fun to play with. He is also supposedly a good scout.

posted about 6 years ago
#17 daily lft - high/mid scout in Recruitment (looking for team)

bump

posted about 6 years ago
#9 1 gbps vs 10 gbps ethernet in Q/A Help
Setsul#2/#6
SFP+ with twinaxial copper is garbage, specced to 10m for 10G. Standard Cat6 can do 55m, Cat6a 100m.
SFP+ optical is specced for 10km 10G and that is much overkill and so ridiculously expensive that I've never seen that being suggested for a home network.

I mean yeah. Nothing changes, like I said, stick to consumer friendly and probably more than enough 1Gb. Not arguing for people to buy SFP compatible switches, then the modules, then the cables, and then the NICs.. It's just as of right now, it's the cheapest way to pull off 10Gb in a home network.

posted about 6 years ago
#6 1 gbps vs 10 gbps ethernet in Q/A Help

SFP+ probably isn't what you're thinking it is.

With SFP+, you're capable of pushing 10Gb between devices. Locally. It's expensive (compared to Cat5a 1Gb), and they require special connectors and cables you'd have to buy online and then install. Then in order to really be effective you need a switch that would support it. Those aren't cheap exactly either, and then not only all of that, but every device you want connected to 10Gb has to be able to reach the said network switch.

To put it plainly, there is a lot of money (compared to not doing it), and planning that has to go into having an enthusiast networking setup. You're much better off grabbing a much cheaper 1Gb managed network switch off of Amazon, and connecting everything to that. Your modem/router would plug into the switch, and the switch would then distribute any actual Internet connectivity through the port you have the modem plugged into.

Just lookup SFP on Google Images if you don't believe me.

posted about 6 years ago
#4 1 gbps vs 10 gbps ethernet in Q/A Help
Starry_NebulaedailyStuff

.

Thanks for your help. How can you find out what your provider allows?

(also i wish you didn't edit your post I understood what you were saying, oh well)

You would just have to check with whoever pays the bill for it, they would likely know. If you pay, then check with your ISP. They can tell you over the phone or probably online.

Also I edited it because while it was true at one time that providers used cache servers a lot, they don't really now'a days, so the example was quite outdated, and hard to follow for people who don't really know a lot about networking or computers in general.

Edit: Remember your speeds almost always up to the advertised amount. They aren't guaranteed.

posted about 6 years ago
#2 1 gbps vs 10 gbps ethernet in Q/A Help

Okay, so a few things.

1.) Your internet speeds are only as fast as your ISP provides. This means that if you get 100Mbps download and 50Mbps upload from your provider, Cat6 cables that can do 10Gb are not going to benefit you anymore than Cat5a cables that can do 1Gb. This is especially true if the modem/router your provider has given you doesn't even have ports that support that speed. Most now days will have 1Gb ports, but unless you're an extreme enthusiast, you're not seeing 10Gb without SFP+, which I would bet almost everything you don't have.

2.) New cables are always a great purchase, especially if your's are real old. Cables can break down over time, and while unlikely, can hinder performance. The important thing is really what the cable is made out of. Do some research about shielding inside of Ethernet cables. Shielded Ethernet cables reduce noise, which could help with performance, but it certainly isn't going to give you any more speed than what you should be expecting.

3.) A VPN can theoretically give you better peering options and routing, if your ISP's suck. A lot of people do this for streaming services such as YouTube or Twitch.

Edit:

I forgot to mention that although having higher speed rated cables won't improve your Internet speed, they certainly can improve local network speed. Devices connected via your modem/router or a switch if you want to get fancy will share data at the maximum speed supported by the ports on your device. In my case, devices connected in my house all go through my 1Gb port Cisco switch, so streaming movies and music from one to the other is quick.

posted about 6 years ago
#14 daily lft - high/mid scout in Recruitment (looking for team)

bump

posted about 6 years ago
#15 Mobile hotspot question in Off Topic
SetsulYou obviously still have to connect all other pcs to it and iirc manually set the IP adress on each pc.

This is correct. Consumer versions of Windows don't have any kind of DHCP server built-in like your router/modem would. Make sure all hosts are within the same subnet (aka. use the same subnet mask) and fall within a network that the subnet mask encompasses.

Settings like the following would allow each PC connected to talk to each other.

IP address: 192.168.1.1-254
Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
Default gateway: IP of the machine hosting the network.

Keep in mind not all wireless chipsets are going to support broadcasting a network. If not, your best bet is to get a really cheap network switch (that can be found online for $20-30), and connect everyone to it via Ethernet.

posted about 6 years ago
#45 private music trackers in Music, Movies, TV
the301stspartanlumieresi'd recommend starting on something else like notwhat or a general private tracker, build your ratio and then get into apollo/red through user class forums etc. it's kind of a slow process but if you're not willing to wait then you're probably just going to get banned from private trackers anyway. this way you'll at least understand how ratio building works, whether or not you want to invest in a seedbox, etc.

and finally to those saying they don't understand the point of private trackers it's kind of something you have to experience to see the value. rather than searching through tons of sketchy ass public sites you have everything you could want, well seeded, full FLACs and vinyl rips, etc. if all you download is 128/320kbps albums then yeah it's probably not worth your time, but for anyone who listens to a lot of music it's kind of like valhalla.

But if you have money for audiophile gear to enjoy your 24bit 96000hz vinyl rips and money for a seedbox, you also have money for direct download premiums/ usenet accounts or actually just buying your music, and all of those seem much less laborious to my uninformed self than getting into high level torrenting?

A large reason for these large repositories of music that can be downloaded is that a lot of the time music is just not available, free or commercially.

posted about 6 years ago
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ⋅⋅ 12