Talking about Main and under here. Restrictions should be experience based. If you played played main last season and are playing intermediate this season you are sandbagging. If you pounded in your first season of sixes, move up one division and are still pounding, you are not sandbagging. If you have the same amount of sixes experience as your competition, it is fair. If you have more experience and played at a higher level than where you are now, then it's not fair. It's that fucking simple. It's not hard to go from open to main in three seasons. If you feel like you need to go down a division, then you're shit at the game. You don't get to go down and play less experienced competition, you get to lose and be a hardstuck shitter. If you're competition has the same amount of experience, it's fair, no matter how much better you are. If you're a shitter who can only compete with against less experienced players, it's not fair.
Meanwhile we have the rgl admins basing restrictions off logs. My teams pocket scout with one season of open sixes experience got restricted in intermediate because he does 300dpm... Meanwhile the first place IM team has two shitters who played main last season.
Make Main and under experience based and we will actually see who the good players are. The high level teams will consist of players who improve fast and move up each season. It would be a lot more interesting. Results wont be skewed by retards like danny o who get to play in open after 7 seasons/3 years of sixes experience in UGC.