JynxiitwiikuuZolakwhy creating all this shitstorm?
The first page and a half was brigaded by the bottom of the European barrel to stir up a controversy on the basis that, if they lie and cry hard enough, the situations "Degu/Pred" and "Samski/Puo" would be considered "equal" and therefor the outcome should be the same, unfortunately for them, in the real world, those situations are not the same.
People just want there to be no hypocrisy when it comes to punishing 'toxicity', people like you - safe space utopia crusaders - proved that whining and crying in a thread gets you what you want. Just because you dont agree with it doesnt make it any worse than what has happened in other instances.
It doesnt matter if these situations are 'equal' or not, what matters is that the rules are very grey and are being made up as we find we ourselves in these new situations, and it seems from my point of view that all of the people making the rules are a hivemind of 'no meanies!', making it feel very one sided when things like this come up.
No they're just doing 'hurr durr, our friend got banned so this person should be banned'. So they act like ball bags and whinge about admins.
In reality samski made a cunt of a comment in a private mumble that puoskari was not in. He didn't make his comment directly to puoskari, which is why its not the same as pred's actions, ergo the response is not hypocritical. I couldn't really call for you to be banned if you now went and called me every name under the sun to your friends. Its really fucking simple and it's tiring having all the pointless sniping at admins
Whether he deserves to be banned for what he actually did do is another point. I don't think so but yeah. Maybe for deleting the evidence.