SnerkThis thread has turned into a "material design" hud showcase. Anyone trying to make something new gets shit...
Do you even know what material design is supposed to be like? I think you're getting confused between "minimalist design" and "material design". They are different, but have their similarities.
#5043 - 11 frags. NOT material design.
#5047 - 6 frags. NOT material design.
#5055 - 61 frags. I'm not exactly sure what Devamar is going for here in terms of "material" or whatever you think. But I think the main reason why this got so many frags is because the animation and menu is amazingly well-made. Hell, every piece of work Dev has done & posted here gets tons of frags, most likely because he does things a lot of HUD makers haven't done.
#5057 - 22 frags. NOT material design.
#5063 - 13 frags. NOT material design. Looks like a modified kbnhud by the font of the health targetid.
I think post #5064 didn't do that well because the font is not something everyone will like. People these days seem to like more minimalist fonts and images. Having lines on your screen with angles and a hard to read font is probably not that attractive to the average user. Whereas a font like Roboto or Helvetica is used quite often because of how easy to read it is, and everyone seems to like it because of that.
I know perfectly well what material design is, and I know there has not been posted a lot of it the last days/weeks, but that wasn't really the point of my comment. The point was that there are a lot of similar ideas and huds in this thread, and as soon as someone experiments with something different, they just get shit feedback. I'm in no way saying the other huds in the thread are bad, as I use a simple HUD with the Roboto font myself, and the frags Devamar gets are well deserved. I just think straight up saying something someone else has made is bad is kind of unnecessary.