| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561198071785065 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:111519337] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:55759668 |
| Country | Italy |
| Signed Up | November 15, 2015 |
| Last Posted | April 2, 2024 at 9:54 PM |
| Posts | 2103 (0.7 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | 6.91 |
| Windows Sensitivity | 6/11 |
| Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
400 |
Resolution |
1920x1080 |
Refresh Rate |
240hz |
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | Logitech G Pro |
| Keyboard | Logitech G Pro Keyboard |
| Mousepad | Steelseries QCK + |
| Headphones | Apple earbuds |
| Monitor | Alienware 240hz |
fightI don't want my steak still alive, and I don't want it fossilized
anyone who cooks food to anything but medium doesn't understand how cooking works
Sure steak and burgers being cooked medium is good but how do you stand eating mushy french fries?
Opinions on well done food? I personally love having things like fries burnt.
the301stspartanReeroThis is the problem. When people judge posts by frag count and let it sway their decision to contribute to a discussion.
If you let the prospect of getting downfragged keep you from posting your opinion, it was never strong enough to be worth posting to begin with.
It's certainly in the realm of possibility that someone could have a strong argument but is also just insecure of themselves and can make the mistake of taking down frags to heart
the301stspartanI see your point now, but in an ideal setting I would think that you +frag people you agree with, -frag shitposts and don't vote on contributing posts even if you disagree with themThat seems overly complicataed and not intuitive. +frags and -frags should be analogous in usage.
eg.
guy
My stance on this is x and here is why
3 people agree
1 person doesn't
+3
other guy
my stance on this is contrary to guy and here is why
3 people disagree
1 person agrees
+1
shitposter
xD I am not contributing to the discussion
4 people agree this is a shitpost
-4
As you see, in a perfect setting by not voting on something you disagree with, you are successfully showing disapproval towards it.
True, which is why I stated its observed as best case scenario. Unfortunately, while many people find votes silly (me included) there are some who hold unpopular opinions and when they see their opinion get downfragged like shitposters normally do, they fear they will also get downfragged and treated the same as a shitposter (given that most frequent shitposters carry that reputation with them). This creates an environment where some unpopular opinions are suppressed which is unhealthy for forums and political discussions.
fatswimdudethis isnt reddit though where -votes can sort controversial but well-written comments to the bottom. -frags are completely functionless
if someone is basing their view of your opinions off of frag count they probably shouldnt be participating in intelligent discussions in the first place
just -frag stuff if u dont like it and +frag it if u do its not supposed to be a fully thought-out decision
This is the problem. When people judge posts by frag count and let it sway their decision to contribute to a discussion.
the301stspartanReeroI get your point now, but nowhere in my post did I say that anyone had to contribute to the post after rating. I was just expressing that I normally only -frag shitposts, my bad for not expressing that eloquently.
Ye but by your rules, that would be the only valid way to show your disapproval of the content of the post.
I see your point now, but in an ideal setting I would think that you +frag people you agree with, -frag shitposts and don't vote on contributing posts even if you disagree with them
eg.
guy My stance on this is x and here is why
3 people agree
1 person doesn't
+3
other guy my stance on this is contrary to guy and here is why
3 people disagree
1 person agrees
+1
shitposter xD I am not contributing to the discussion
4 people agree this is a shitpost
-4
As you see, in a perfect setting by not voting on something you disagree with, you are successfully showing disapproval towards it.
the301stspartanReeroI don't understand why $layer is being -fragged. Political opinions aside he put much effort and time into forming an articulate and convincing argument but people are -fragging him only because they disagree with him. I know minus frags might seem silly but I thought only shitposts and poorly made posts (Not $layers) are supposed to receive -frags..
If you're trying to say that everybody on this video game forum is supposed to undertake a structural, logical and syntactic analysis of every post to discern if it's objectively worthy of a + or -frag before rating it regardless of your own opinion of the comment and afterwards reply to the comment in detail to explain why all opinions presented in it are ridiculous and dumb,Show ContentI'm gonna -frag ur post
I get your point now, but nowhere in my post did I say that anyone had to contribute to the post after rating. I was just expressing that I normally only -frag shitposts, my bad for not expressing that eloquently.
AvastJust because someone puts in the time to make something and explain themselves does not mean it makes sense.
Once again, point taken but I never was arguing that slayer shouldn't be -fragged because his argument made sense but that I felt that he shouldn't have been -fragged because he was contributing to the discussion just like everyone else.
I don't understand why $layer is being -fragged. Political opinions aside he put much effort and time into forming an articulate and convincing argument but people are -fragging him only because they disagree with him. I know minus frags might seem silly but I thought only shitposts and poorly made posts (Not $layers) are supposed to receive -frags..
saamhttp://i.imgur.com/U5NnenU.jpg
Walked in on this crew talking about cutting muma...
Were you waiting to post this in the predictions thread only for it to be nuked?
gg congrats to ascent
Well, Katie being 11 would explain it not being able to spell...
Really cool guy. Incredible game sense/maincalling. Deserves a spot on a high open team.